Aristophanes Ecclesiazusae 706

Ecclesiazusae. Aristophanes. . 2026-09-08.

Current edition Experimental

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (English) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Ἐκκλησιάζουσαι Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 2. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.) — 711 focus
Translations (2)
Ecclesiazusae (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Anonymous; 1938 compilation). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.) — 711 focus
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 711 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

706. mvp-tlg0019-tlg010-sanjaya-com-eng1-21

Line 706

ἐψήφισται προτέροις βινεῖν,
The text exhibits a significant textual crux at the verb form: the reading βινεῖν (to beat) is the transmitted reading found in the medieval manuscripts (e.g., B, D), but it is widely regarded as a corruption or scribal error. The context of the Ecclesiazusae involves the assembly of women debating laws, and 'to beat' (a rare and semantically awkward infinitive in this political context) makes little sense. Most modern editors, following the conjecture of Dindorf or others, prefer the reading βουλεύειν (to deliberate/counsel) or perhaps a different verb entirely, as βινεῖν appears to be a hapax or a corruption of βουλεύειν where the initial syllable was misread or the text was corrupted by a scribe unfamiliar with the specific political terminology. The verb βινέω is otherwise unattested in this sense in Classical Greek, making this a clear case for textual criticism.