Aristophanes Frogs 1045

Table of Contents

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

← Previous Next →

Frogs. Aristophanes. . 2026-09-08.

Current edition Experimental

English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (English) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Βάτραχοι Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 2. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.) — 1045 focus
Translations (1)
Frogs (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Matthew Dillon). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.) — 1045 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

1047. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-48

Line 1047

ὥστε γε καὐτόν σε κατʼ οὖν ἔβαλεν.
The particle combination καὐτόν (καὶ + αὐτόν) with the enclitic γε and the subsequent ἔβαλεν exhibits a specific metrical and syntactic feature of Aristophanic comedy: the elision of the final epsilon in ἔβαλεν before the following vowel (implied or elided in the manuscript tradition) is standard, but the placement of the pronoun αὐτόν immediately after καὶ with the enclitic γε creates a rare rhythmic accentuation pattern often used to heighten the comic emphasis of the action. More critically, the verb ἔβαλεν here is not a standard aorist indicative but likely a form of ἔβαλον (aorist of βάλλω) with the augment elided or the form contracted, a phenomenon attested in papyri and critical editions of Aristophanes where the augment is dropped in the middle of a line to fit iambic trimeter, a feature that requires specific attention in syntactic parsing to avoid misidentifying the tense or mood.

1051. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-49

Line 1051

κώνεια πιεῖν αἰσχυνθείσας διὰ τοὺς σοὺς Βελλεροφόντας.
The participle αἰσχυνθείσας (aorist passive participle of αἰσχύνομαι) is used with the infinitive πιεῖν in a construction where the subject of the participle (the women, implied by the context of the play's satire on Spartan women) is also the logical subject of the infinitive. This is a standard construction of the genitive absolute or, more precisely here, a genitive participle agreeing with an implied subject in the accusative (the women) that governs the infinitive, a structure common in Aristophanic comedy to denote cause or attendant circumstance. However, the specific phrase 'κώνεια πιεῖν' (to drink water) followed by the participle 'having been ashamed' creates a syntactic ambiguity: does the shame precede the drinking as a cause, or is the shame the result of the drinking? The context of the play (lines 1025-1026) clarifies that the women are ashamed to drink water because of the 'Bellerophons' (a pun on the Spartan soldiers who were supposedly defeated by the 'Bellerophons' of Athens, or a reference to the Spartan practice of drinking wine from water-skins, which is being mocked). The phrase 'διὰ τοὺς σοὺς Βελλεροφόντας' (because of your Bellerophons) is a pointed political allusion: the Spartans, known for their austerity and military prowess, are being mocked by the Athenians for their supposed defeat by the 'Bellerophons' (a reference to the Spartan king Pausanias, who was accused of treason and was associated with the myth of Bellerophon, a hero who was also associated with the city of Argos, a Spartan ally). The commentary must address the syntactic complexity of the participle and the historical allusion to the 'Bellerophons' as a political insult.
The term 'Βελλεροφόντας' (Bellerophons) is a deliberate pun and allusion. In the context of Aristophanes' Frogs, it refers to the Spartan soldiers, but the name 'Bellerophon' is also associated with the myth of the hero who was accused of treason by the Spartans (specifically, the Spartan king Pausanias, who was accused of treason and was associated with the myth of Bellerophon). The pun is that the Spartans are being mocked for their supposed defeat by the 'Bellerophons' (a reference to the Spartan king Pausanias, who was accused of treason and was associated with the myth of Bellerophon, a hero who was also associated with the city of Argos, a Spartan ally). The commentary must address the historical allusion to the 'Bellerophons' as a political insult.

1059. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-50

Line 1059

μεγάλων γνωμῶν καὶ διανοιῶν ἴσα καὶ τὰ ῥήματα τίκτειν.
The participle τίκτειν ('to bring forth') functions as a complementary infinitive dependent on the implied verb of 'producing' or 'generating' understood from the context of the preceding clause (likely referring to the tragic poet's style). This construction, where a transitive verb of 'bringing forth' takes a direct object (μεγάλων γνωμῶν καὶ διανοιῶν) and a complementary infinitive expressing the action of the object, is a distinctive Aristophanic usage that personifies abstract concepts ('great thoughts and plans') as the offspring of the poet's rhetoric. The phrase ἴσα καὶ τὰ ῥήματα ('equal even to the words') creates a syntactic tension: is ἴσα modifying the thoughts/plans themselves as being 'equal' to the words, or is it a predicate adjective with the infinitive, suggesting the 'birth' of thoughts is equal to the 'birth' of words? The genitive absolute construction is absent here, relying instead on a compressed comparative structure typical of the play's satirical tone regarding the 'greatness' of Euripides' new-fangled vocabulary versus traditional tragic diction.

1071. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-51

Line 1071

τῶν μειρακίων στωμυλλομένων, καὶ τοὺς Παράλους ἀνέπεισεν
The phrase τῶν μειρακίων στωμυλλομένων utilizes the genitive absolute construction with the present active participle of στωμυλλέω. This verb is a hapax legomenon in this specific form within Aristophanes and carries a specialized, pejorative nuance of 'mumbling' or 'speaking in an unintelligible, muttering fashion,' distinct from the more common ὀμυλλέω or generic terms for talking. The construction effectively isolates the behavior of the youths as the causal or circumstantial backdrop for the main verb, highlighting the specific, disruptive nature of their speech which Xanthias or Dionysus (depending on the immediate context) overcomes by convincing the Paraloí (a specific corps of rowers) to intervene.