1248.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg007-sanjaya-com-eng1-65
Line 1248
The form κυρσανίως is a dialectal adverb derived from Κέρσαντος (the Lesbian form of Κέρκυνθος), the island where the Lesbian poet Alcaeus was exiled. Aristophanes employs this specific adverbial form to evoke the 'Lesbian' style of composition and the specific cultural geography of the Lesbian exile, a motif often associated with Alcaeus's political songs. The choice of the Lesbian dialect form rather than the Attic Κερκυραῖος or Κερκυνθίος is a deliberate marker of the 'Lesbian' literary persona being adopted or referenced here, connecting the immediate context to the tradition of Alcaean iambic and political poetry.
1251.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg007-sanjaya-com-eng1-66
Line 1251
ὅκα τοὶ μὲν ἐπʼ Ἀρταμιτίῳ
The phrase ἐπ' Ἀρταμιτίῳ presents a textual crux regarding the specific reference of the proper noun. While most editors accept the reading Ἀρταμιτίῳ (dative) as a reference to the island of Artemisium, some manuscript traditions and conjectures suggest Ἀρταμιτίδῃ or other variations that might imply a different location or a corrupted form of a personal name. The dative case here indicates location 'at' or 'on,' which is syntactically standard but semantically ambiguous without resolving the textual variant, as the exact identity of the place in this comedic context (possibly a pun or a specific historical allusion to the naval battle or a local sanctuary) is debated.
1252.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg007-sanjaya-com-eng1-67
Line 1252
The text presents a severe corruption. The reading πρὤκροον is likely a scribal error for πρῶτον (first) or a corruption of a specific technical term, while σιοείκελοι appears to be a garbled form of σιμοί (similar) or perhaps a misreading of σιδηρείοι (iron-like) or σιδηροειδῆς, though the most probable reconstruction in the context of Lysistrata (where the women discuss the state of the city or the men's condition) involves a discussion of resemblance or order. However, the specific sequence 'πρὤκροον σιοείκελοι' does not correspond to any known coherent phrase in the Aristophanic corpus or standard lexica. It is likely a conflation of πρῶτον (first) and σιμοί (similar) or a corruption of πρῶτον σιδηροειδῆ (first iron-like) or similar, but the exact crux requires consultation of the critical apparatus for Lysistrata, specifically around line 1000-1100 where the women's chorus discusses the state of affairs. The most plausible reconstruction is that the text is corrupted and should be read as πρῶτον σιμοί (first similar) or a similar phrase, but the specific corruption 'πρὤκροον σιοείκελοι' is a textual crux requiring emendation.
1255.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg007-sanjaya-com-eng1-68
Line 1255
The phrase employs the dialectal adverb ᾇπερ (Homeric and tragic ὅπερ) in the Dorian dialect of Aristophanic comedy, here functioning as a relative adverb of place ('wherever' or 'whither') modifying the imperative ἆγεν. This construction, coupled with the Dorian form of the verb (ἆγεν for ἄγε) and the adverbial particle κάπρως (a comic corruption or dialectal variant of καπρῶς, 'like a boar'), creates a dense syntactic cluster typical of the play's choral or paratragic moments, where the syntax mirrors the chaotic, bestial energy of the scene.
1256.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg007-sanjaya-com-eng1-69
Line 1256
The form θάγοντας is an Ionic dialectal variant of the Attic present participle ἄγοντας (from ἄγω), meaning 'leading' or 'drawing out.' In the context of *Lysistrata*, this refers to the specific medical procedure of tooth extraction, a common trope in Aristophanic comedy where characters threaten or perform crude surgeries. The use of the Ionic dialect here is characteristic of Aristophanes' metrical flexibility and his tendency to employ dialectal forms for comic effect or to fit the iambic trimeter, rather than a strict adherence to Attic orthography.
1257.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg007-sanjaya-com-eng1-70
Line 1257
πολὺς δʼ ἀμφὶ τὰς γένυας ἀφρὸς † ἤνσει †,
The verb ἤνσει is not attested in any surviving manuscript of Aristophanes and represents a conjectural emendation (often attributed to Hermann or similar editors) for the transmitted reading ἤνσει or similar. The intended sense is likely 'frothed' or 'foamed' (from ἀνέχω or a related compound), but the transmitted text is corrupt or the reading is a conjecture based on the context of a woman foaming at the mouth in rage. The dagger marks (†) in the prompt indicate this is a known crux requiring editorial intervention.
1261.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg007-sanjaya-com-eng1-71
Line 1261
The text presents a crux of textual transmission and dialectal form. While the standard Attic form would be τὰς ψάμμους τοὺς Πέρσας (or the accusative plural τοὺς Πέρσας with the article τοὺς), the manuscript tradition here preserves the Doric forms τᾶς and τοὶ. More significantly, the noun ψάμμα is an Attic rarefied form; the standard Attic plural is ψάμμος, while the form ψάμμα (often appearing as ψάμματα in other contexts or dialects) here functions as a metrical variant or a specific Doric/Aeolicism adopted by Aristophanes to mock or exoticize the Persian identity. The phrase is a fragment of a larger line where the word order and morphology are manipulated for comedic effect, likely alluding to the Persian practice of counting sand (a metaphor for innumerable hosts), but the specific morphological choice of ψάμμα alongside the Doric articles creates a syntactic irregularity that challenges the reader to identify the intended dialectal register.
