Aristophanes Birds 310

Anonymous (Translator), ed. Eugene O'Neill, Jr., ed. Whitney J. Oates, ed. Eugene O'Neill, Jr.

Birds. Aristophanes. Anonymous (Translator), ed. Eugene O'Neill, Jr., ed. Whitney J. Oates, ed. Eugene O'Neill, Jr.. New York. 1938.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Birds (English) (Aristophanes. The Complete Greek Drama, Vol. 2. Anonymous, translator. O'Neill, Eugene; Oates, Whitney Jennings, editors. New York: Random House, 1938 (printing).)

Editions (1)
Ὄρνιθες Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 1. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906.) — 310 focus
Translations (2)
Birds (OCR draft) Experimental (Anonymous translation, 1938 compilation; legacy Perseus source migration. Preserved separately from the revised canonical perseus-eng2 at the project owner's request.) — 310 focus
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 310 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

313. mvp-tlg0019-tlg006-sanjaya-com-eng1-11

Line 313

τί τί τί τί τί τί τί τί· τίνα λόγον ἄρα ποτὲ
The sevenfold repetition of τί at the beginning of the sentence functions as a hyperbolic expression of exasperation or bewilderment, a comedic device characteristic of Aristophanic parody of tragic style. This specific instance mirrors the opening of Aeschylus's Agamemnon (τί δ' ἔστιν;) or the repetitive interrogatives in Euripides, here exaggerated to the point of absurdity to mock the tragic hero's rhetorical self-importance. The repetition is not a scribal error but a deliberate metatheatrical gesture, signaling the play's engagement with tragic convention through grotesque amplification.