mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
1
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
2
εἰ
3
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
4
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
5
λόγων
6
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
7
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
8
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
9
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
10
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
11
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
12
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
13
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
14
καί
15
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
16
ἦ … δὴ
17
ἦ … γὰρ
18
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
19
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
20
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
21
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
22
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
23
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
24
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
25
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
26
ὑμῶν
27
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
28
προσωτάτω φύγω
29
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
30
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
31
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
32
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
33
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
34
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
35
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
36
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
37
μέντοι
38
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
39
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
40
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
41
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
42
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
43
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
44
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
45
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
46
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
47
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
48
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
49
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
50
ὅν γ’
51
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
52
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
53
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
54
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
55
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
56
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
57
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
58
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
59
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
60
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
61
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
62
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
63
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
64
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
65
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
66
ἐκ δὲ
67
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
68
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
69
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
70
τοῦ
71
παρόντος
72
του
73
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
74
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
75
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
76
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
77
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
78
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
79
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
80
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
81
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
82
τούτων μὲν
83
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
84
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
85
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
86
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
87
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
88
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
89
ῥοαῖσιν
90
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
91
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
92
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
93
ἔνθεν
94
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
95
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
96
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
97
ὅταν
98
σῳζέσθω
99
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
100
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
101
τλημονεστάτη
102
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
103
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
104
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
105
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
106
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
107
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
108
δέξασθαι
109
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
110
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
111
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
112
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
113
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
114
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
115
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
116
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
117
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
118
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
119
λιπαρῆ
120
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
121
ἀλίπαρον
122
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
123
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
124
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
125
αὐτὸν
126
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
127
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
128
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
129
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
130
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
131
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
132
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
133
μέλειν
134
μέλον
135
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
136
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
137
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
138
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
139
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
140
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
141
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
142
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
143
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
144
ἔτι
145
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
146
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
147
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
148
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
149
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
150
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
151
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
152
κλύουσαν
153
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
154
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
155
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
156
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
157
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
158
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
159
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
160
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
161
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
162
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
163
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
164
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
165
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
166
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
167
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
168
ἀψεφές
169
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
170
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
171
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
172
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
173
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
174
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
175
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
176
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
177
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
178
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
179
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
180
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
181
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
182
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
183
ἔλιπεν
184
οἴκου
185
οἴκους
186
πω
187
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
188
αἰκία
189
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
190
μέν
191
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
192
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
193
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
194
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
195
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
196
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
197
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
198
πολλούς
199
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
200
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
201
τραχεῖα
202
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
203
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
204
κακῶς κλύουσα
205
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
206
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
207
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
208
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
209
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
210
Ἑλλήνων
211
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
212
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
213
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
214
κτανὼν
215
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
216
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
217
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
218
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
219
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
220
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
221
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
222
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
223
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
224
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
225
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
226
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
227
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
228
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
229
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
230
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
231
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
232
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
233
ἐρεῖς
234
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
235
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
236
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
237
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
238
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
239
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
240
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
241
πατέρα
242
φὴς
243
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
244
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
245
δείξω
246
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
247
ἔσπασεν
248
πειθὼ
249
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
250
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
251
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
252
τὰ πολλὰ
253
ἔσχε
254
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
255
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
256
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
257
κείνης
258
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
259
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
260
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
261
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
262
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
263
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
264
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
265
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
266
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
267
βαλών
268
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
269
ἔπος
270
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
271
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
272
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
273
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
274
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
275
ἀντίσταθμον
276
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
277
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
278
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
279
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
280
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
281
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
282
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
283
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
284
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
285
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
286
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
287
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
288
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
289
μὴ … τιθῇς
290
τίθης
291
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
292
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
293
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
294
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
295
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
296
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
297
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
298
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
299
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
300
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
301
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
302
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
303
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
304
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
305
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
306
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
307
ἦ
308
καὶ τοῦτ’
309
ἄποινα
310
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
311
δ’
312
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
313
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
314
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
315
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
316
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
317
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
318
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
319
ἣ
320
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
321
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
322
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
323
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
324
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
325
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
326
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
327
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
328
δή μέ σοι
329
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
330
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
331
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
332
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
333
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
334
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
335
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
336
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
337
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
338
μένος πνέουσαν
339
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
340
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
341
ἐμοὶ
342
μοι
343
δεῖ
344
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
345
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
346
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
347
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
348
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
349
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
350
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
351
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
352
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
353
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
354
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
355
αἰσχροῖς
356
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
357
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
358
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
359
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
360
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
361
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
362
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
363
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
364
μόλῃ
365
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
366
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
367
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
368
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
369
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
370
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
371
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
372
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
373
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
374
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
375
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
376
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
377
mvp-comment-366-1
λυτηρίους … δειμάτων
378
mvp-comment-366-2
ἀνάσχω
379
mvp-comment-367-1
κλύοις ἂν
380
mvp-comment-367-2
προστατήριε
381
mvp-comment-368-1
κεκρυμμένην
382
mvp-comment-368-2
οὐ γὰρ ἐν φίλοις
383