mvp-comment-20-1
εἰ μή τι
1
mvp-comment-20-2
καιροῦ τυγχάνω
2
mvp-comment-20-3
μεθάρμοσον
3
mvp-comment-21-1
γὰρ
4
mvp-comment-21-2
ἱκόμην
5
mvp-comment-21-3
μάθοιμ’
6
mvp-comment-21-4
ἀροίμην
7
mvp-comment-22-1
χρῇ
8
τοιαῦθ’
9
ὧν
10
mvp-comment-22-2
ὁ Φοῖβος
11
mvp-comment-22-3
πεύσει
12
mvp-comment-22-4
This verse might seem the preface to some longer recital (cp.
Ph. 1418
n.). But in fact it is merely an emphatic prelude to the oracle:
τάχα
13
mvp-comment-23-1
αὐτὸν
14
ἀσπίδων
15
mvp-comment-23-2
ἀσπίδων τε καὶ στρατοῦ
16
δόλοισι
17
mvp-comment-23-3
χειρὸς
18
σφαγάς
19
mvp-comment-23-4
κλέψαι
20
mvp-comment-24-1
ὅτε
21
mvp-comment-24-2
σὺ μὲν μολὼν
22
mvp-comment-24-3
καιρὸς
23
mvp-comment-24-4
ἴσθι
24
mvp-comment-25-1
γήρᾳ
25
χρόνῳ μακρῷ
26
mvp-comment-25-2
οὐδ’ ὑποπτεύσουσιν
27
οὐ μὴ γνῶσι
28
mvp-comment-25-3
ὧδ’ ἠνθισμένον
29
mvp-comment-26-1
Φωκεύς
30
mvp-comment-26-2
ἀνδρὸς Φανοτέως. ἀνήρ
, thus prefixed to a proper name, serves either: (
a) to introduce a person not previously men tioned,—being more respectful than
τις
, as
Il. 11. 92
ἄνδρα Βιήνορα
,
Her. 8. 82
ἀνὴρ Παναίτιος
: or (
b) adds something of solemnity or pathos to the mention of a familiar name, as
Soph.
O. C. 109
ἀνδρὸς Οἰδίπου
,
Soph.
Ai. 817
ἀνδρὸς Ἕκτορος
.
mvp-comment-26-3
Phanoteus was the eponymous hero of the town Phanoteus (
Thuc. 4. 89
), or Panopeus (
Il. 2. 520
etc., Paus. , Strabo), in Phocis, close to the Boeotian frontier, —about three miles west of Chaeroneia, and as many east of Daulis. He was the brother of Crisus, from whom the town of Crisa in Phocis (about two miles w. s. w. of Delphi) took its name. Between these brothers, said the legend, there was a deadly feud; before birth they had struggled in the womb (Tzetzes,
Lycophr. 939: cp. Preller,
Griechische Mythologie, 2. p. 54 n. 5). Now Crisus was the father of Strophius, that king of Crisa who was the ally of Agamemnon, and with whom the young Orestes found a home. Hence Phanoteus, the foe of Crisus, is represented as the friend of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra. He is the first to send them the glad tidings that Orestes is dead. On the other hand it is Strophius who is described as paying the last honours to the corpse, and sending the ashes to Mycenae (1111).
mvp-comment-26-4
ὁ γὰρ
31
mvp-comment-27-1
μέγιστος
32
mvp-comment-27-2
τυγχάνει
33
mvp-comment-27-3
δορυξένων
34
mvp-comment-28-1
ὅρκον
35
ὅρκῳ
36
mvp-comment-28-2
On the other hand, the phrase
προστιθέναι ὅρκον
has the authority of Sophocles himself: fr. 431
ὅρκου δὲ προστεθέντος ἐπιμελεστέρα
|
ψυχὴ κατέστη
. Cp. too
Tr. 255
ὅρκον αὑτῷ προσβαλών
.
mvp-comment-28-3
The false oath would be regarded as excused by the
δόλοι
which Apollo had prescribed (v. 37); but in fact the Paedagogus takes no such oath.
mvp-comment-29-1
ἀναγκαίας τύχης
37
mvp-comment-29-2
ἄθλοισι
38
Πυθικοῖσιν
39
mvp-comment-29-3
τροχηλάτων
40
mvp-comment-29-4
ἑστάτω
41
mvp-comment-30-1
ἐφίετο
42
mvp-comment-30-2
λοιβαῖσι
43
mvp-comment-30-3
καρατόμοις χλιδαῖς
44
mvp-comment-30-4
στέψαντες
45
mvp-comment-30-5
ἄψορρον … πάλιν
46
mvp-comment-31-1
τύπωμα
47
χαλκόπλευρον
48
mvp-comment-31-2
ἠρμένοι
49
mvp-comment-31-3
Others take
ἠρμένοι
as middle. This use of
ἦρμαι
is not unknown to later Greek;
e.g. Strabo 3. p. 150 has
νίκην ἠρμένοι
=
ἀράμενοι
. But there is no example of it in the classical period.
mvp-comment-32-1
Join
που
50
καὶ σὺ
51
mvp-comment-32-2
The
v.l.
μοι
52
mvp-comment-33-1
λόγῳ κλέπτοντες
53
mvp-comment-33-2
φέρωμεν
54
mvp-comment-33-3
ἔρρει
55
mvp-comment-33-4
δέμας
56
mvp-comment-34-1
τί γάρ με λυπεῖ
57
mvp-comment-34-2
ἔργοισι
58
mvp-comment-34-3
κἀξενέγκωμαι
59
mvp-comment-35-1
δοκῶ μέν
60
σὺν κέρδει
61
mvp-comment-35-2
κακόν
62
mvp-comment-36-1
πολλάκις
63
mvp-comment-36-2
λόγῳ μάτην θνῄσκοντας
64
mvp-comment-36-3
ἐκτετίμηνται
65
mvp-comment-37-1
ὡς
66
mvp-comment-37-2
κἄμ’ ἐπαυχῶ
67
mvp-comment-37-3
ἄπο
68
mvp-comment-37-4
δεδορκότ’
69
mvp-comment-37-5
ἐχθροῖς
70
λάμψειν
71
mvp-comment-37-6
ἄστρον
72
mvp-comment-37-7
ἔτι
73
mvp-comment-38-1
πατρῴα γῆ
74
mvp-comment-38-2
εὐτυχοῦντα
75
mvp-comment-38-3
ὁδοῖς
76
mvp-comment-39-1
καθαρτής
77
mvp-comment-39-2
πρὸς θεῶν ὡρμημένος
78
mvp-comment-40-1
ἀλλ’ ἀρχέπλουτον
79
mvp-comment-40-2
ἀρχέπλουτον
80
mvp-comment-40-3
καταστάτην
81
mvp-comment-41-1
εἴρηκα μέν νυν ταῦτα
82
mvp-comment-41-2
μελέσθω
83
mvp-comment-42-1
ἐπιστάτης
84
mvp-comment-43-1
ἰώ μοί μοι δύστηνος
85
mvp-comment-44-1
καὶ μὴν
86
mvp-comment-44-2
θυρῶν
87
mvp-comment-44-3
I should agree with the schol. in governing
θυρῶν
by
ἔνδον
88
mvp-comment-44-4
προσπόλων τινὸς
89
mvp-comment-45-1
θέλεις | μείνωμεν … ;
90
mvp-comment-45-2
The reading of the MSS.,
κἀνακούσωμεν
91
mvp-comment-45-3
On the other hand Sophocles has
ἐπακούω
, ‘to listen,’ in
O. T. 708
,
O. T. 794
:
O. C. 694
:
Ph. 1417.
Nauck's correction,
κἀπακούσωμεν
92
mvp-comment-46-1
μηδὲν πρόσθεν
93
mvp-comment-46-2
τὰ Λοξίου
94
mvp-comment-46-3
ἀρχηγετεῖν
95
mvp-comment-47-1
πατρὸς
96
mvp-comment-47-2
λουτρά
97
mvp-comment-47-3
φέρει … ἐφ’ ἡμῖν
98
mvp-comment-47-4
νίκην
99
κράτος τῶν δρωμένων
100
mvp-comment-47-5
All three actors now leave the scene. Orestes and Pylades go to Agamemnon's grave,—departing, probably, by the entrance on the spectators' right. The Paedagogus leaves by the entrance on the left,—to await the moment for seeking admission to the house (v. 660).—It might, indeed, be inferred from
πειρώμεθ’
(83) that the old man goes with the youths to their task; but the word need not imply more than his participation in the plan. while verses 73—75 seem clearly to indicate that he separates from his companions. When they have gone, Electra enters from the house.
mvp-comment-48-1
A
θρῆνος ἀπὸ σκηνῆς
, or lyric lament delivered by an actor alone. as dist. from the joint
κομμός
of actor and Chorus (121 n.).
mvp-comment-48-2
Verses 86—102 form a
σύστημα
,=vv. 103—120 (
ἀντισύστημα
). If the text is sound, the correspondence is not exact, since the dimeter in v. 99 answers to a monometer in v. 116. These anapaests are, however, of the type usually known as ‘free’ or ‘melic,’ as having more of a lyric character than the regular anapaests of the marching-songs (like those of the Parodos in the
Ajax): see W. Christ,
Metrik, 2nd ed., § 288. And in such anapaests the symmetry of ‘systems’ is often not strict (cp.
O. C. 117
n.).
mvp-comment-48-3
ὦ φάος ἁγνὸν
101
mvp-comment-48-4
γῆς ἰσόμοιρ’ ἀήρ
102
mvp-comment-48-5
ἰσόμοιῤ
103
ἰσόμοιρος
104
mvp-comment-49-1
πολλὰς μὲν … ᾔσθου
105
mvp-comment-49-2
ἀντήρεις
106
mvp-comment-50-1
πληγὰς
107
πλαγὰς
108
mvp-comment-51-1
ὑπολειφθῇ
109
ᾔσθου
110
mvp-comment-52-1
τὰ … παννυχίδων
111
ξυνίσας’
112
ὅσα … θρηνῶ
113
mvp-comment-52-2
ἤδη
114
mvp-comment-52-3
The MS.
οἴκων
115
λέκτρων
116
μογερῶν
117
mvp-comment-53-1
ὅσα τὸν δύστηνον
118
mvp-comment-54-1
κατὰ μὲν βάρβαρον αἶαν
119
ἐξένισεν
120
mvp-comment-55-1
Ἄρης
121
mvp-comment-55-2
ἐξένισεν
122
mvp-comment-56-1
κοινολεχὴς
123
mvp-comment-57-1
ὅπως δρῦν ὑλοτόμοι
124
mvp-comment-57-2
σχίζουσι
125
mvp-comment-57-3
κάρα
126
mvp-comment-57-4
πέλεκει
127
mvp-comment-58-1
ἄλλης
128
mvp-comment-58-2
φέρεται
129
mvp-comment-58-3
The deletion of the words
ἀπ’ ἄλλης
130
ἢ )μοῦ
131
mvp-comment-59-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μὲν δὴ
132
mvp-comment-60-1
ἄστρων
133
mvp-comment-60-2
Others read,
ἔστ’ ἂν λεύσσω παμφεγγεῖς
|
ῥιπάς, λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
, omitting
ἄστρων
. But
παμφεγγεῖς ῥιπάς
, without
ἄστρων
, would not suffice to denote starlight. If, again, the phrase is taken to denote the
sun's rays (as Monk proposes,
Mus. Crit. I. p. 67), then
λεύσσω δὲ τόδ’ ἦμαρ
becomes weak. Further, the preceding context, in which she has spoken of her laments
at night (92) and at morning, clearly suggests that the sense here is, ‘so long as I look on the
stars or on the
sun.’
mvp-comment-61-1
μὴ οὐ
134
mvp-comment-61-2
τεκνολέτειῤ
135
mvp-comment-62-1
ἐπὶ κωκυτῷ
136
mvp-comment-62-2
ἠχὼ
137
mvp-comment-63-1
Electra invokes, (1) the house of Hades and his bride Persephone, in which the spirit of Agamemnon now dwells; (2) Hermes, who, as
ψυχοπομπός
, conducted him thither,—and who will also guide the avengers on their way (1395 f.); (3)
Ἀρά
, the imprecation uttered by the victim upon his murderers,—the personified curse, here conceived as a supernatural power (
πότνια
), which calls the Erinyes into action; and (4) the Erinyes themselves.
mvp-comment-63-2
Ἀΐδου
138
mvp-comment-64-1
ὦ χθόνἰ Ἑρμῆ
139
mvp-comment-64-2
Ἀρά
140
mvp-comment-64-3
πότνια
141
mvp-comment-65-1
σεμναὶ
142
mvp-comment-65-2
θεῶν παῖδες
143
mvp-comment-66-1
ὁρᾶθ’
144
mvp-comment-67-1
αἳ τοὺς εὐνὰς ὑποκλεπτομένους
145
mvp-comment-67-2
These much-impugned words appear genuine. The murder has been prompted by the guilty love:
δόλος ἦν ὁ φράσας, ἔρος ὁ κτείνας
(197). In Electra's thought, they are inseparable. The allusion to the love
follows the reference to the murder, because she regards it as the crowning outrage (271
τὴν τελευταίαν ὕβριν
) that Clytaemnestra still lives with Aegisthus. Bloodshed was not the only sin which the Erinyes punished. They were the embodied sanctions of natural law, and every crime against the family came within their cognisance. (See
Introd. to Homer, p. 51, § 13.) Indeed, Electra herself speaks of the unhallowed union as a special provocation to those Avengers: 275 f.
ἡ δ’ ὧδε τλήμων ὥστε τῷ μιάστορι
|
ξύνεστ’, Ἐρινὺν οὔτιν’ ἐκφοβουμένη
.
mvp-comment-68-1
τείσασθε
146
mvp-comment-69-1
ἡμετέρου
147
μοι
148
mvp-comment-69-2
καί μοι
149
mvp-comment-70-1
ἄγειν
150
mvp-comment-70-2
σωκῶ
151
mvp-comment-71-1
δυστανοτάτας
152
mvp-comment-72-1
τάκεις … οἰμωγὰν
153
mvp-comment-72-2
ἀκόρεστον
154
mvp-comment-72-3
τὸν πάλαι
155
mvp-comment-72-4
πάλαι
156
ἐκ
157
mvp-comment-72-5
ἀθεώτατα
158
mvp-comment-72-6
κακᾷ … χειρὶ πρόδοτον
159
χειρὶ
160
mvp-comment-72-7
ὡς
161
mvp-comment-72-8
ὁ τάδε πορὼν
162
mvp-comment-72-9
εἴ μοι θέμις
163
mvp-comment-73-1
γενέθλα
164
mvp-comment-73-2
γενναίων
165
mvp-comment-73-3
παραμύθ‐
166
ιον
167
mvp-comment-74-1
ξυνίημι
168
mvp-comment-74-2
τάδ’
169
mvp-comment-75-1
φυγγάνει
170
mvp-comment-75-2
οὐδ’ ἐθέλω
171
mvp-comment-76-1
μὴ οὐ
172
mvp-comment-76-2
τὸν ἐμὸν … πατέρ’ ἄθλιον
173
mvp-comment-77-1
παντοίας
174
mvp-comment-77-2
Electra's lyrics contain some Doricisms (129, 146 f., etc.): but it is best to retain
φιλότητος
, with the MSS. The form in
η
was so familiar through Homer that it may have been preferred to
φιλότατος
even in lyrics.
Cp. 236
.
mvp-comment-78-1
ἀλύειν
175
mvp-comment-79-1
αἰαῖ, ἱκνοῦμαι
176
mvp-comment-80-1
τόν γ’ ἐξ Ἀΐδα … λίμνας
177
mvp-comment-80-2
παγκοίνου
178
mvp-comment-80-3
ἀνστάσεις
179
mvp-comment-81-1
οὔτε †γόοις οὔτε λιταῖσιν
180
οὔτε γόοισιν οὔτ’ εὐχαῖς
181
mvp-comment-82-1
For the repetition of
ἀλλά
182
mvp-comment-82-2
ἀπὸ τῶν μετρίων
183
mvp-comment-82-3
ἀμήχανον
184
mvp-comment-82-4
ο=ιόλλυσαι
185
mvp-comment-83-1
ἐν οἷς
186
mvp-comment-83-2
ἀνάλυσις … κακῶν
187
mvp-comment-83-3
τί μοι
188
mvp-comment-84-1
νήπιος
189
mvp-comment-84-2
γονέων
190
mvp-comment-85-1
ἐμέ γ’ … ἄραρεν
191
mvp-comment-85-2
φρένας
192
mvp-comment-86-1
αἰὲν Ἴτυν
193
mvp-comment-87-1
ὄρνις
194
mvp-comment-87-2
ἀτυζομένα
195
mvp-comment-87-3
Διὸς ἄγγελος
196
mvp-comment-88-1
Νιόβα, σὲ δ’
197
θεόν
198
mvp-comment-88-2
ἅτ’
199
mvp-comment-88-3
ἐν τάφῳ πετραίῳ
200
mvp-comment-89-1
αἰεὶ
201
mvp-comment-90-1
οὔτοι σοὶ μούνᾳ
202
mvp-comment-91-1
πρὸς ὅ τι
203
mvp-comment-91-2
τῶν ἔνδον εἶ περισσά
204
mvp-comment-92-1
οἷς
205
τῶν ἔνδον
206
mvp-comment-92-2
ὁμόθεν
207
γονᾷ ξύναιμος
208
mvp-comment-93-1
οἵα Χρ. ζώει
209
mvp-comment-93-2
Acc. to the version followed by Sophocles, Agamemnon had four daughters, Iphigeneia, Electra, Chrysothemis, Iphianassa. This was the account given in the cyclic
Κύπρια ἔπη
, as the schol. here mentions; a poem of which there is another trace in this play (566 ff.). Sophocles wrote an
Ἰφιγένεια
(
Nauck,
frag. Soph. 284—292
); but her name is not mentioned in the reference to her death below (530—594). In
Il. 9. 145
Agamemnon has three daughters, Chrysothemis, Laodicè, Iphianassa: Homer does not mention Iphigeneia. Lucretius gives the name of Iphianassa to the victim at Aulis (
1. 85
).
mvp-comment-93-3
ζώει
210
mvp-comment-93-4
καὶ Ἰφιάνασσα
211
mvp-comment-94-1
ἀχέων
212
mvp-comment-94-2
Hermann, taking
ἀχέων
213
κρυπτᾷ
214
mvp-comment-95-1
ὄλβιος, ὃν
215
mvp-comment-95-2
For the simple
ὅς
, instead of
ὅς γε
or
ὅστις
, with causal force, cp. below, 188, 261, 959;
O.T. 817.
mvp-comment-96-1
δέξεται εὐπατρίδαν
216
mvp-comment-96-2
Διὸς εὔφρονι
217
βήματι
218
mvp-comment-96-3
γᾶν
219
γᾶ
220
mvp-comment-96-4
Ὀρέσταν
221
ὃν
222
mvp-comment-97-1
ἀκάματα
223
mvp-comment-97-2
ἀνύμφευτος
224
ἄτεκνος
225
mvp-comment-97-3
οἰχνῶ
226
mvp-comment-98-1
δάκρυσι μυδαλέα
227
mvp-comment-98-2
τὸν ἀνήνυτον
228
mvp-comment-98-3
οἶτον ἔχουσα
229
mvp-comment-99-1
ὧν τ’ ἔπαθ’
230
ὧν τ’ ἐδάη
231
mvp-comment-99-2
Wecklein, reading
ἐδάην
, explains,— ‘what I have heard from him,’—viz., his promises of coming.
mvp-comment-99-3
τί γὰρ … ἀγγελίας
232
mvp-comment-99-4
ἀπατώμενον
233
τί … οὐκ
234
mvp-comment-99-5
Herwerden's
οὐχί μοι
235
οὐκ ἐμοί
236
ὁ δέ
237
mvp-comment-100-1
ποθεῖ, ποθῶν δ’
238
mvp-comment-101-1
ἔτι μέγας οὐρανῷ
239
ἐν
240
mvp-comment-102-1
τὸν ὑπεραλγῆ
241
mvp-comment-102-2
νέμουσα
242
mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
243
οἷς
244
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
245
θεός
246
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
247
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
248
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
249
βουνόμον
250
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
251
Κρῖσαν
252
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
253
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
254
ἀνάσσων
255
θεὸς
256
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
257
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
258
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
259
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
260
ἅτις
261
τοκέων
262
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
263
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
264
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
265
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
266
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
267
ἀμφίσταμαι
268
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
269
κοίταις
270
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
271
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
272
ἐν
273
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
274
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
275
σοι
276
ἀνταία
277
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
278
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
279
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
280
δεινὰν … μορφάν
281
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
282
βροτῶν
283
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
284
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
285
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
286
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
287
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
288
τοῖς
289
θανάτους
290
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
291
διδύμοιν
292
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
293
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
294
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
295
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
296
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
297
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
298
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
299
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
300
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
301
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
302
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
303
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
304
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
305
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
306
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
307
πλάθειν
308
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
309
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
310
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
311
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
312
ἔξοιδ’
313
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
314
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
315
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
316
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
317
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
318
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
319
σχήσω
320
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
321
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
322
τίνι
323
πρόσφορον
324
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
325
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
326
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
327
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
328
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
329
θρήνων
330
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
331
γε
332
εὐνοίᾳ
333
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
334
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
335
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
336
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
337
κακότατος
338
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
339
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
340
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
341
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
342
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
343
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
344
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
345
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
346
ἐκτίμους
347
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
348
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
349
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
350
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
351
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
352
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
353
ὢν
354
εἰ
355
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
356
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
357
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
358
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
359
εὐσέβεια
360
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
361
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
362
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
363
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
364
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
365
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
366
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
367
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
368
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
369
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
370
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
371
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
372
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
373
ᾗ
374
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
375
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
376
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
377
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
378
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
379
δοκεῖς
380
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
381
εἰσίδω δ’
382
ἴδω δὲ
383
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
384
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
385
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
386
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
387
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
388
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
389
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
390
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
391
αὐτοφόντην
392
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
393
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
394
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
395
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
396
Ἐρινὺν
397
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
398
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
399
τότε
400
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
401
τηροῦς’
402
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
403
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
404
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
405
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
406
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
407
κατὰ στέγας
408
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
409
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
410
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
411
αὑτήν
412
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
413
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
414
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
415
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
416
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
417
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
418
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
419
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
420
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
421
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
422
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
423
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
424
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
425
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
426
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
427
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
428
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
429
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
430
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
431
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
432
παρών
433
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
434
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
435
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
436
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
437
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
438
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
439
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
440
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
441
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
442
μοι
443
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
444
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
445
εὐσεβεῖν
446
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
447
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
448
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
449
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
450
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
451
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
452
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
453
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
454
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
455
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
456
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
457
ἦ τ<*>ν
458
ἦ δἂν
459
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
460
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
461
ὥς νυν
462
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
463
τό
464
τά
465
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
466
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
467
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
468
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
469
ἢ μέλλοντος
470
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
471
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
472
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
473
γε
474
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
475
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
476
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
477
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
478
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
479
νυν
480
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
481
φέρουσαν
482
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
483
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
484
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
485
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
486
νομίζεται
487
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
488
φωνεῖς
489
ἐλθοῦσα
490
αὖ
491
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
492
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
493
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
494
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
495
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
496
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
497
πλεῖν
498
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
499
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
500
ἀλλὰ
501
ἄλλα
502
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
503
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
504
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
505
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
506
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
507
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
508
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
509
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
510
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
511
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
512
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
513
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
514
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
515
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
516
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
517
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
518
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
519
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
520
φρονοῦσα
521
μῖσος
522
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
523
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
524
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
525
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
526
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
527
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
528
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
529
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
530
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
531
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
532
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
533
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
534
ξύνει
535
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
536
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
537
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
538
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
539
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
540
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
541
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
542
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
543
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
544
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
545
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
546
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
547
πρὸς ὀργὴν
548
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
549
τοῖς λόγοις
550
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
551
πάλιν
552
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
553
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
554
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
555
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
556
κοὐδ’
557
ποτέ
558
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
559
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
560
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
561
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
562
εἰ
563
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
564
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
565
λόγων
566
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
567
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
568
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
569
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
570
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
571
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
572
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
573
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
574
καί
575
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
576
ἦ … δὴ
577
ἦ … γὰρ
578
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
579
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
580
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
581
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
582
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
583
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
584
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
585
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
586
ὑμῶν
587
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
588
προσωτάτω φύγω
589
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
590
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
591
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
592
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
593
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
594
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
595
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
596
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
597
μέντοι
598
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
599
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
600
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
601
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
602
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
603
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
604
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
605
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
606
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
607
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
608
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
609
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
610
ὅν γ’
611
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
612
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
613
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
614
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
615
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
616
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
617
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
618
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
619
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
620
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
621
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
622
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
623
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
624
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
625
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
626
ἐκ δὲ
627
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
628
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
629
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
630
τοῦ
631
παρόντος
632
του
633
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
634
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
635
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
636
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
637
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
638
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
639
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
640
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
641
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
642
τούτων μὲν
643
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
644
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
645
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
646
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
647
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
648
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
649
ῥοαῖσιν
650
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
651
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
652
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
653
ἔνθεν
654
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
655
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
656
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
657
ὅταν
658
σῳζέσθω
659
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
660
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
661
τλημονεστάτη
662
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
663
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
664
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
665
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
666
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
667
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
668
δέξασθαι
669
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
670
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
671
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
672
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
673
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
674
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
675
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
676
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
677
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
678
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
679
λιπαρῆ
680
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
681
ἀλίπαρον
682
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
683
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
684
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
685
αὐτὸν
686
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
687
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
688
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
689
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
690
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
691
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
692
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
693
μέλειν
694
μέλον
695
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
696
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
697
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
698
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
699
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
700
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
701
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
702
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
703
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
704
ἔτι
705
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
706
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
707
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
708
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
709
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
710
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
711
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
712
κλύουσαν
713
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
714
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
715
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
716
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
717
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
718
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
719
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
720
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
721
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
722
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
723
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
724
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
725
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
726
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
727
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
728
ἀψεφές
729
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
730
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
731
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
732
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
733
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
734
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
735
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
736
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
737
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
738
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
739
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
740
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
741
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
742
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
743
ἔλιπεν
744
οἴκου
745
οἴκους
746
πω
747
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
748
αἰκία
749
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
750
μέν
751
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
752
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
753
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
754
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
755
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
756
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
757
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
758
πολλούς
759
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
760
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
761
τραχεῖα
762
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
763
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
764
κακῶς κλύουσα
765
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
766
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
767
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
768
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
769
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
770
Ἑλλήνων
771
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
772
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
773
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
774
κτανὼν
775
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
776
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
777
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
778
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
779
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
780
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
781
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
782
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
783
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
784
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
785
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
786
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
787
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
788
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
789
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
790
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
791
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
792
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
793
ἐρεῖς
794
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
795
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
796
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
797
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
798
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
799
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
800
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
801
πατέρα
802
φὴς
803
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
804
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
805
δείξω
806
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
807
ἔσπασεν
808
πειθὼ
809
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
810
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
811
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
812
τὰ πολλὰ
813
ἔσχε
814
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
815
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
816
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
817
κείνης
818
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
819
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
820
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
821
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
822
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
823
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
824
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
825
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
826
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
827
βαλών
828
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
829
ἔπος
830
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
831
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
832
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
833
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
834
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
835
ἀντίσταθμον
836
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
837
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
838
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
839
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
840
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
841
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
842
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
843
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
844
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
845
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
846
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
847
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
848
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
849
μὴ … τιθῇς
850
τίθης
851
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
852
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
853
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
854
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
855
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
856
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
857
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
858
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
859
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
860
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
861
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
862
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
863
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
864
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
865
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
866
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
867
ἦ
868
καὶ τοῦτ’
869
ἄποινα
870
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
871
δ’
872
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
873
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
874
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
875
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
876
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
877
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
878
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
879
ἣ
880
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
881
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
882
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
883
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
884
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
885
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
886
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
887
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
888
δή μέ σοι
889
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
890
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
891
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
892
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
893
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
894
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
895
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
896
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
897
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
898
μένος πνέουσαν
899
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
900
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
901
ἐμοὶ
902
μοι
903
δεῖ
904
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
905
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
906
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
907
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
908
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
909
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
910
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
911
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
912