mvp-comment-103-1
μήτε ὑπεράχθεο
1
οἷς
2
mvp-comment-104-1
εὐμαρὴς θεός
3
θεός
4
mvp-comment-105-1
οὔτε γὰρ
5
mvp-comment-105-2
Κρῖσαν
6
mvp-comment-105-3
Crisa stood about two miles W.S.W. of Delphi, on a spur of Parnassus, at the lower outlet of the gorge through which the river Pleistus issues into the plain. The
Iliad mentions ‘sacred Crisa’ (
ζαθέην
, 2. 520). But the Homeric Hymn to the Pythian Apollo is the best witness to its ancient power. There, just as here, the name
Κρῖσα
includes the land which stretches southward from the town to its harbour on the ‘wide gulf’ (vv. 253— 261). We need not, then, read
Κρίσᾳ
or
Κρίσας
. Crisa was the earliest seat of trade on the western sea; Delphi, when first founded, was merely a sanctuary in its territory. Pindar recalls the old prominence of its name when he describes a Pythian victory as won
Κρισαίαις ἐνὶ πτυχαῖς
(
P. 6. 18).
mvp-comment-105-4
Cirrha, a town of much later date, was the port of Crisa on the gulf. About 585 B.C., the Delphians, aided by Cleisthenes of Sicyon and his allies, succeeded, after a long struggle, in humbling Crisa and destroying Cirrha. The Crisaean plain was then devoted to Apollo, whose domain was thus extended from his temple to the coast. When Sophocles wrote, that ground was still a
βούνομος ἀκτή
, inviolable by plough or spade. It was not till the middle of the next century that the alleged encroachments of Amphissa on the
ἱερὰ χώρα
gave a pretext for war to the Amphictyons (355 B.C.).
mvp-comment-105-5
Ulrichs (
Reisen in Griechenland) was the first to place the relations of Crisa and Cirrha in a clear light. Strabo correctly describes the site of Cirrha, but erroneously places Crisa to the east of it (9. p. 418).
mvp-comment-106-1
βούνομον
7
βουνόμον
8
mvp-comment-106-2
βούνομον ἀκτὰν
9
Κρῖσαν
10
mvp-comment-107-1
ἀπερίτροπος
11
mvp-comment-108-1
παρὰ τὸν Ἀχέροντα
12
ἀνάσσων
13
θεὸς
14
mvp-comment-109-1
μὲν
15
mvp-comment-109-2
ὁ πολὺς … βίοτος
16
mvp-comment-109-3
ἀνέλπιστος
17
mvp-comment-109-4
187 *
τεκέων
. I am now satisfied that this is a true correction of
τοκέων
18
ἅτις
19
τοκέων
20
mvp-comment-110-1
ἁπερεί
21
mvp-comment-110-2
ἔποικος
22
mvp-comment-111-1
οἰκονομῶ θαλάμους
23
mvp-comment-112-1
ἀεικεῖ σὺν στολᾷ
24
mvp-comment-113-1
κεναῖς δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
25
ἀμφίσταμαι
26
mvp-comment-113-2
Hartung, reading
κενὰ δ’ ἀμφίσταμαι τραπέζαις
, takes the sense to be that she stands ‘hungry’ by the tables at which the others feast. But
κενή
as=
νῆστις
would be neither usual nor elegant.
mvp-comment-114-1
Hitherto the Chorus have offered consolation or counsel. At v. 213 they return to that strain. But here, moved by Electra's misery, they join with her in bewailing its cause.
mvp-comment-114-2
οἰκτρὰ μὲν … πλαγά
27
κοίταις
28
οἰκτρὰ … αὐδὰ
29
mvp-comment-114-3
Sophocles, who follows the Homeric story as to the banquet, could not but remember the
οἰκτροτάτην ὄπα
of the dying Cassandra. And this might naturally suggest to him that other
οἰκτρὰ αὐδή
which she had uttered at an earlier moment, immediately after Agamemnon's return,—her presage of his fate, and her own:
Aesch.
Ag. 1072
—1314.
mvp-comment-114-4
The sense then is:—‘There was a voice of lamentation at the return from Troy’; alluding especially to Cassandra's laments, but also, perhaps, to forebodings in the mouth of the people at Mycenae. ‘And there was a voice of lamentation
ἐν κοίταις πατρῴαις
, when thy father lay on the couch at the fatal banquet.’ The ‘voice’ at the banquet is, first, that of the dying Agamemnon; but Sophocles may have thought also of Cassandra's death-cry, which was sounding in the king's ears as he fell.—For other interpretations, see Appendix.
mvp-comment-114-5
νόστοις
30
ἐν
31
mvp-comment-114-6
κοίταις
32
mvp-comment-114-7
ὅτε οἱ
33
σοι
34
ἀνταία
35
mvp-comment-114-8
γενύων
36
mvp-comment-115-1
δόλος … ἔρος
37
mvp-comment-116-1
δεινὰν δεινῶς
38
δεινὰν … μορφάν
39
mvp-comment-116-2
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
40
βροτῶν
41
mvp-comment-117-1
πλέον … ἐχθίστα
42
mvp-comment-117-2
δὴ
43
mvp-comment-118-1
νὺξ
44
mvp-comment-118-2
δείπνων
45
mvp-comment-119-1
ἄχθη
46
τοῖς
47
θανάτους
48
mvp-comment-119-2
διδύμαιν χειροῖν
49
διδύμοιν
50
mvp-comment-120-1
εἷλον … πρόδοτον
51
mvp-comment-121-1
οἷς
52
mvp-comment-121-2
Ὀλύμπιος
53
mvp-comment-122-1
ποίνιμα
54
mvp-comment-123-1
ἀγλαΐας
55
mvp-comment-123-2
ἀποναίατο
56
mvp-comment-124-1
πόρσω
57
mvp-comment-125-1
γνώμαν ἴσχεις
58
mvp-comment-125-2
ἐξ οἵων
59
mvp-comment-125-3
τὰ παρόντ’
60
mvp-comment-125-4
οἰκείας
61
mvp-comment-126-1
πολύ … τι κακῶν
62
mvp-comment-126-2
ὑπερεκτήσω
63
mvp-comment-127-1
τὰ δὲ
64
οὐκ ἐριστὰ τοῖς δυνατοῖς
65
πλάθειν
66
mvp-comment-127-2
ἐριστά
67
mvp-comment-127-3
πλάθειν
68
mvp-comment-128-1
δεινοῖς ἠναγκάσθην
69
mvp-comment-129-1
ὀργά
70
ἔξοιδ’
71
mvp-comment-130-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
72
mvp-comment-130-2
ἐν … δεινοῖς
73
mvp-comment-130-3
σχήσω
74
mvp-comment-130-4
ταύτας ἄτας
75
mvp-comment-131-1
ὄφρα
76
mvp-comment-131-2
βίος ἔχῃ με
77
σχήσω
78
mvp-comment-132-1
τίνι γάρ … τίνι φρονοῦντι καίρια
79
ἀκούσαιμ’ ἂν πρόσφορον ἔπος
80
τίνι
81
πρόσφορον
82
mvp-comment-132-2
Other explanations are:—(1) Taking the dative with
πρόσφορον
:—‘To what person who feels aright would that word be suitable which I should hear (=which would be said of me)?’ That is: Should I not deserve to incur a censure from which every right-minded person would shrink? Should I not deserve to be called
δυσσεβής
? This seems forced; and it does not well suit
ἔπος
. (2) Taking the dative with
ἀκούσαιμι
:—‘At whose mouth (=
from whom), that thinks aright, could I hear a suitable word of comfort?’ But such a dative seems impossible. In
Il. 16. 515
δύνασαι δὲ σὺ πάντοσ’ ἀκούειν
|
ἀνέρι κηδομένῳ
, the dat. is one of interest, denoting the person whose prayer is heard (‘
for him’); cp.
Il. 5. 115
κλῦθί μοι
: 24. 335
ἔκλυες ᾧ κ’ ἐθέλῃσθα
.
mvp-comment-133-1
ἄνετε
83
mvp-comment-133-2
ἄλυτα
84
mvp-comment-133-3
κεκλήσεται
85
mvp-comment-133-4
231 f. For
ἐκ
86
mvp-comment-133-5
ἀνάριθμος
87
θρήνων
88
mvp-comment-134-1
ἀλλ’ οὖν
89
γε
90
εὐνοίᾳ
91
mvp-comment-135-1
μάτηρ ὡσεί τις
92
mvp-comment-136-1
μὴ τίκτειν
93
mvp-comment-136-2
ἄταν ἄταις
94
mvp-comment-137-1
καὶ τί μέτρον
95
κακότατος
96
mvp-comment-137-2
φέρε
97
mvp-comment-137-3
ἐπὶ τοῖς φθ.
98
mvp-comment-138-1
ἔβλαστ’
99
mvp-comment-139-1
τούτοις
100
mvp-comment-140-1
εἴ τῳ πρόσκειμαι χρηστῷ
101
mvp-comment-141-1
ξυνναίοιμ’
102
mvp-comment-141-2
εὔκηλος
103
mvp-comment-141-3
γονέων
104
ἐκτίμους
105
mvp-comment-141-4
ἐκτίμους ἵσχουσα
106
mvp-comment-141-5
πτέρυγας … γόων
107
mvp-comment-141-6
ὀξυτόνων
108
mvp-comment-142-1
εἰ γὰρ
109
mvp-comment-142-2
γᾶ
110
mvp-comment-142-3
οὐδὲν
111
ὢν
112
εἰ
113
mvp-comment-142-4
Electra is contrasting her father, whose earthly life has been cut short, with his murderers, who survive. But she believes that his spirit lives in the world below, and will be active in aiding the vengeance (453 ff.).
mvp-comment-142-5
πάλιν
114
mvp-comment-142-6
ἀντιφόνους δίκας
115
mvp-comment-143-1
ἔρροι τ’
116
mvp-comment-143-2
αἰδὼς
117
εὐσέβεια
118
mvp-comment-144-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
119
mvp-comment-144-2
καὶ
120
τὸ σὸν … καὶ τοὐμὸν
121
mvp-comment-145-1
νίκα
122
mvp-comment-145-2
ἅμα
123
mvp-comment-146-1
πολλοῖσι θρήνοις
124
mvp-comment-147-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
125
mvp-comment-148-1
ἥτις εὐγενὴς γυνή
126
mvp-comment-149-1
πατρῷα … πήματα
127
mvp-comment-150-1
κατ’ εὐφρόνην
128
mvp-comment-150-2
θάλλοντα
129
mvp-comment-151-1
ᾗ
130
mvp-comment-151-2
πρῶτα μὲν … εἶτα … ἔπειτα
131
ᾗ
132
mvp-comment-151-3
τὰ μητρὸς
133
mvp-comment-151-4
ἔχθιστα συμβέβηκεν
134
mvp-comment-152-1
κἀκ τῶνδ’ ἄρχομαι
135
mvp-comment-153-1
λαβεῖν … τὸ τητᾶσθαι
136
mvp-comment-154-1
ποίας
137
δοκεῖς
138
mvp-comment-155-1
ἴδω
139
εἰσίδω δ’
140
ἴδω δὲ
141
mvp-comment-155-2
μὲν
142
mvp-comment-156-1
ἐσθήματα
143
mvp-comment-156-2
ἐκείνῳ
144
mvp-comment-156-3
παρεστίους … λοιβάς
145
ἔνθ’ ἐκεῖνον ὤλεσεν
146
mvp-comment-156-4
Acc. to
Homer. Hymn. 29. 4 ff., feasts began and ended with libations to Hestia:
οὐ γὰρ ἄτερ σοῦ
|
εἰλαπίναι θνητοῖσιν, ἵν’ οὐ πρώτῃ πυμάτῃ τε
|
Ἱστίῃ ἀρχόμενος σπένδει μελιηδέα οἶνον
. Soph. fr. 658
<*> πρῷρα λοιβῆς Ἑστία
. Other divinities, including Zeus
σωτήρ
, were similarly honoured; then the paean was sung, and the
πότος
began ( Plat.
Symp.p. 176 A).
mvp-comment-157-1
τούτων
147
mvp-comment-158-1
αὐτοέντην
148
mvp-comment-158-2
Brunck first adopted
αὐτοέντην
149
αὐτοφόντην
150
mvp-comment-158-3
ἡμὶν
151
mvp-comment-159-1
ταλαίνῃ
152
mvp-comment-160-1
ταύτην … τῷδε
153
mvp-comment-161-1
μιάστορι
154
Ἐρινὺν
155
mvp-comment-162-1
ἐγγελῶσα τοῖς ποιουμένοις
156
mvp-comment-163-1
εὑροῦς’
157
τότε
158
mvp-comment-163-2
The conjecture
φρουροῦς’
159
τηροῦς’
160
mvp-comment-164-1
χοροὺς ἵστησι
161
mvp-comment-164-2
μηλοσφαγεῖ … ἱερὰ
162
mvp-comment-164-3
ἔμμην’ ἱερά
163
mvp-comment-164-4
τοῖς σωτηρίοις
164
mvp-comment-164-5
Argive tradition placed Agamemnon's death on the 13th of Gamelion (about the end of January). So said ‘the Argive historians’ (
οἱ Ἀργολικοὶ συγγραφεῖς
),— according to an Argive writer named Deinias, who lived about 225 B.C. (Schol. here: Müller,
Frag. Hist. vol. III. p. 25.) Possibly, then, the idea of Clytaemnestra's hideous festival may have been suggested to the poet by some actual commemoration of the event in Argolis. There was a cult of Agamemnon in various places,—notably in Laconia. (Cp. Roscher's
Lexicon, p. 96.)
mvp-comment-165-1
ἡ δύσμορος
165
κατὰ στέγας
166
mvp-comment-166-1
τέτηκα
167
mvp-comment-166-2
πατρὸς
168
mvp-comment-166-3
The
δαίς
is the feast which, in Homeric fashion (
Il. 1. 467
), would follow the sacrifice (281). Acc. to Eustathius p. 1507. 61 (on
Hom.
Od. 4. 524
ff.),
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαὶς
(or
τράπεζα
) was a proverb
ἐπὶ τῶν ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ εὐωχουμένων
. The poet may mean that Clytaemnestra called the festival
Ἀγαμεμνόνειος δαίς
, in direct allusion to
δεῖπνα ἄρρητα
(203): and this would give a special point to
ἐγγελῶσα
(277). Cp.
Eur.
Or. 1008
τά τ’ ἐπώνυμα δεῖπνα Θυέστου
. But the words do not necessarily imply more than that she called it
Ἀγαμεμνόνεια
.
mvp-comment-167-1
αὐτὴ πρὸς αὑτήν
169
αὑτήν
170
mvp-comment-167-2
κλαῦσαι
171
mvp-comment-167-3
ἡδονὴν φέρει
172
mvp-comment-168-1
ἡ λόγοισι γενναία
173
mvp-comment-169-1
φωνοῦσα
174
mvp-comment-170-1
δύσθεον
175
mvp-comment-170-2
μίσημα
176
mvp-comment-170-3
σοὶ μόνῃ
177
mvp-comment-170-4
τέθνηκεν
178
mvp-comment-170-5
ἐν πένθει
179
mvp-comment-171-1
ἐκ γόων
180
mvp-comment-171-2
οἱ κάτω θεοί
181
mvp-comment-172-1
τάδ’
182
mvp-comment-172-2
ἥξοντ’ Ὀρέστην
183
mvp-comment-173-1
παραστᾶς’
184
mvp-comment-174-1
ἥτις
185
mvp-comment-174-2
ὑπεξέθου
186
mvp-comment-175-1
ἀλλ’ ἴσθι τοι τείσουσά γ’
187
mvp-comment-176-1
ὑλακτεῖ
188
mvp-comment-176-2
σὺν
189
mvp-comment-176-3
πέλας
190
παρών
191
mvp-comment-176-4
301 The adv.
πάντα
192
mvp-comment-176-5
ἄναλκις
193
mvp-comment-176-6
ἡ πᾶσα βλάβη
194
mvp-comment-177-1
σὺν γυναιξὶ
195
mvp-comment-177-2
τὰς μάχας
196
mvp-comment-178-1
ἐφήξειν
197
mvp-comment-179-1
μέλλων … δρᾶν τι
198
mvp-comment-179-2
τὰς οὔσας τε … καὶ τὰς ἀπούσας
199
mvp-comment-179-3
μου
200
μοι
201
mvp-comment-179-4
διέφθορεν
202
mvp-comment-180-1
σωφρονεῖν
203
εὐσεβεῖν
204
mvp-comment-180-2
ἔν τοι κακοῖς
205
mvp-comment-180-3
πολλή )στ’ ἀνάγκη
206
κἀπιτηδεύειν κακά
207
mvp-comment-180-4
I place only a comma, not a colon, after
πάρεστιν
208
mvp-comment-181-1
ὄντος … βεβῶτος
209
mvp-comment-182-1
ἦ κάρτα
210
mvp-comment-182-2
θυραῖον
211
mvp-comment-182-3
οἰχνεῖν
212
mvp-comment-182-4
ἀγροῖσι
213
mvp-comment-182-5
τυγχάνει
214
mvp-comment-183-1
ἦ κἂν … ἱκοίμην
215
ἦ τ<*>ν
216
ἦ δἂν
217
mvp-comment-183-2
ἐς λόγους τοὺς σοὺς ἱκοίμην
218
mvp-comment-184-1
ὡς νῦν
219
ὥς νυν
220
mvp-comment-184-2
ἱστόρει· τί σοι φίλον
221
τό
222
τά
223
mvp-comment-184-3
With the other punctuation,
ἱστόρει τί σοι φίλον
224
mvp-comment-185-1
καὶ δὴ
225
mvp-comment-185-2
τοῦ κασιγνήτου τί φής
226
mvp-comment-185-3
ἥξοντος
227
ἢ μέλλοντος
228
mvp-comment-186-1
φησίν γε
229
mvp-comment-186-2
ποεῖ
230
mvp-comment-187-1
καὶ μὴν ἔγωγ’
231
γε
232
mvp-comment-187-2
οὐκ ὄκνῳ
233
mvp-comment-188-1
ἀρκεῖν
234
mvp-comment-189-1
ἐπεί
235
mvp-comment-189-2
μακρὰν
236
mvp-comment-189-3
324 Here, as in 316,
νῦν
237
νυν
238
mvp-comment-189-4
δόμων
239
φέρουσαν
240
mvp-comment-190-1
ὅμαιμον
241
mvp-comment-190-2
φύσιν
242
mvp-comment-191-1
Χρυσόθεμιν
243
mvp-comment-192-1
οἷα
244
νομίζεται
245
mvp-comment-193-1
πρὸς θυρῶνος ἐξόδοις
246
φωνεῖς
247
ἐλθοῦσα
248
αὖ
249
mvp-comment-193-2
330 For the absence of caesura, cp.
Ph. 101
n.
mvp-comment-194-1
θυμῷ … χαρίζεσθαι
250
mvp-comment-195-1
καίτοι τοσοῦτόν γ’ οἶδα
251
mvp-comment-195-2
κἀμαυτήν, ὅτι
252
mvp-comment-195-3
333 f. For the repeated
ἄν
253
mvp-comment-195-4
οἶ) αὐτοῖς φρονῶ
254
mvp-comment-196-1
ὑφειμένῃ
255
πλεῖν
256
mvp-comment-196-2
For the image, cp.
Eur.
Med. 524
ἄκροισι λαίφους κρασπέδοις
(with close-reefed sails)
ὑπεκφυγεῖν
|
τὴν σὴν στόμαργον, ὦ γύναι, γλωσσαλγίαν
:
Ar.
Ran. 997
ἀλλ’ ὅπως, ὦ γεννάδα
, |
μὴ πρὸς ὀργὴν ἀντιλέξεις
, |
ἀλλὰ συστείλας, ἄκροισι
|
χρώμενος τοῖς ἱστίοις κ.τ.λ.
: and conversely
Soph.
Ant. 715
ναὸς ὅστις ἐγκρατῆ πόδα
|
τείνας ὑπείκει μηδέν
.
Ovid
Epist. 1. 8. 71
moderatius opta, | Et voti, quaeso, contrahe vela tui.
Shakesp.
Henry VI., pt. iii, act 3 sc. 3. 5
‘Now Margaret | Must strike her sail, and learn awhile to serve | Where kings command.’
mvp-comment-197-1
καὶ μὴ δοκεῖν
257
mvp-comment-198-1
τοιαῦτα δ’ ἄλλα
258
ἀλλὰ
259
ἄλλα
260
mvp-comment-199-1
καίτοι τὸ μὲν δίκαιον
261
mvp-comment-199-2
κρίνεις
262
mvp-comment-199-3
εἰ … με δεῖ
263
mvp-comment-199-4
ἐλευθέραν
264
mvp-comment-199-5
ζῆν
265
mvp-comment-199-6
πάντ’
266
mvp-comment-199-7
ἀκουστέα
267
mvp-comment-200-1
δεινόν γε
268
mvp-comment-201-1
τῆς … τικτούσης
269
mvp-comment-201-2
μέλειν
270
mvp-comment-202-1
τἀμὰ νουθετήματα
271
mvp-comment-202-2
κείνης διδακτά
272
mvp-comment-202-3
ἐκ σαυτῆς
273
mvp-comment-203-1
The text, which has been suspected (cr. n.), is sound; but the train of thought is somewhat obscured by compression.
mvp-comment-203-2
‘You forget your father, and care only for your mother. All your counsels to me come from her. Then (
ἔπειτα
),—that being so,—give up the attempt at a compromise. Make a
choice (
ἑλοῦ γε
). You can be imprudent (
φρονεῖν κακῶς
),—as you say that I am,—and loyal to your dead father. Or you can be prudent (
φρονοῦσα
), and forgetful of him,—as you actually are; you who (
ἥτις
) say, indeed, that you would show your hatred of the murderers if you could; and yet, when I
do resist them, you try to turn me from my purpose. You merely add the shame of cowardice to our woes.’
mvp-comment-203-3
ἔπειθ’
274
mvp-comment-203-4
ἑλοῦ γε
275
mvp-comment-203-5
φρονεῖν κακῶς
276
mvp-comment-203-6
Other explanations are:—(1) ‘Choose to be thought either
lost to right feeling, or, if you have such feeling, then at least
forgetful of your duty.’ (2) ‘Choose to seem either
unintelligent (if you are merely the blind instrument of our rulers); or, if you act with clear understanding (
φρονοῦσα
),—thinking to benefit me,—at least forgetful of your father.’ Both these views assume that the question is merely between two interpretations which might be placed on the present conduct of Chrysothemis. But Electra is putting the dilemma between imprudent loyalty and prudent disloyalty.
mvp-comment-204-1
τῶν φίλων
277
mvp-comment-205-1
ἥτις
278
φρονοῦσα
279
μῖσος
280
mvp-comment-206-1
πάντα
281
mvp-comment-206-2
τιμωρουμένης
282
mvp-comment-207-1
οὔτε … τε
283
mvp-comment-207-2
τήν τε δρῶσαν
284
mvp-comment-208-1
πρὸς κακοῖσι
285
mvp-comment-208-2
δειλίαν ἔχει
286
mvp-comment-209-1
ἐπεὶ
287
mvp-comment-209-2
ἢ μάθ’ ἐξ ἐμοῦ
288
mvp-comment-210-1
ἐπαρκούντως
289
mvp-comment-211-1
προσάπτειν
290
mvp-comment-211-2
εἴ τις ἔστ’ ἐκεῖ χάρις
291
mvp-comment-212-1
ἡμὶν
292
ξύνει
293
mvp-comment-213-1
τὰ σὰ … δῶῤ
294
mvp-comment-213-2
ἐφ’ οἶσι
295
mvp-comment-213-3
χλιδᾷς
296
mvp-comment-214-1
ὑπεικάθοιμι
297
mvp-comment-214-2
πλουσία
298
mvp-comment-214-3
περιρρείτω
299
mvp-comment-215-1
τοὐμὲ μὴ λυπεῖν
300
mvp-comment-215-2
Remark the resemblance to the passage where Antigone—summing up her position—compares the
moral pain of neglecting her duty with those penalties which she contemns:—
κείνοις ἂν ἤλγουν· τοῖσδε δ’ οὐκ ἀλγύνομαι
(
Ant. 468
). There, too, we have a Sophoclean triad of clauses, the third echoing the first,—as
τῆς σῆς δ’ οὐκ ἐρῶ τιμῆς τυχεῖν
here reiterates the sense of
σοὶ δὲ πλουσία... βίος
(n. on
Ant. 465
ff.).
mvp-comment-215-3
One of the scholia recognises the traditional reading, and explains it correctly: —
τοῦτο μόνον ἐμὲ βοσκέτω, τὸ μὴ λυπεῖν ἐμὲ αὐτήν, εἰ
(‘as I should do, if’)
τοῖς φονεῦσι τοῦ πατρὸς πείθεσθαι ἀναγκασθήσομαι
.—The conjectures have been numerous: see Appendix.
mvp-comment-216-1
οὐδ’ ἂν σὺ
301
mvp-comment-217-1
παῖδα
302
mvp-comment-217-2
κεκλῆσθαι
303
mvp-comment-218-1
πλείστοις
304
mvp-comment-219-1
μηδὲν
305
πρὸς ὀργὴν
306
mvp-comment-220-1
ἀμφοῖν
307
τοῖς λόγοις
308
mvp-comment-221-1
τῆσδε … αὕτη
309
πάλιν
310
mvp-comment-222-1
ἐγὼ μὲν
311
mvp-comment-222-2
πως
312
mvp-comment-222-3
μύθων
313
mvp-comment-223-1
οὐδ’
314
κοὐδ’
315
ποτέ
316
mvp-comment-224-1
ἰὸν
317
mvp-comment-224-2
σχήσει
318
mvp-comment-225-1
τὸ δεινὸν
319
mvp-comment-225-2
εἰ γὰρ τῶνδέ μοι
320
εἰ
321
mvp-comment-226-1
γὰρ
322
mvp-comment-226-2
γόων
323
λόγων
324
mvp-comment-227-1
ἐνταῦθα
325
mvp-comment-227-2
ἔνθα μή ποτε … προσόψει
326
mvp-comment-227-3
ζῶσα
327
mvp-comment-227-4
κατηρεφεῖ
328
mvp-comment-227-5
χθονὸς τῆσδ’ ἐκτὸς
329
mvp-comment-227-6
ὑμνήσεις
330
mvp-comment-228-1
πρὸς ταῦτα
331
mvp-comment-228-2
Nauck reads
κοὔ
332
καί
333
mvp-comment-228-3
ἐν καλῷ, εὔκαιρον
schol.:
H. 4. 3. 5
νομίσαντες οὐκ ἐν καλῷ εἶναι πρὸς τοὺς ὁπλίτας ἱππομαχεῖν
: so, too,
Eur.
Heracl. 971
, etc. Cp.
καλόν
(
ἐστι
)=
καίριον
in
Soph.
Ph. 1155
; and
εἰς καλόν
=
καιρίως
in
O.T. 78.
mvp-comment-229-1
ἦ ταῦτα δὴ
334
ἦ … δὴ
335
ἦ … γὰρ
336
mvp-comment-229-2
καὶ βεβούλευνται
337
mvp-comment-230-1
ἀλλ’ ἐξίκοιτο
338
mvp-comment-230-2
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκ’
339
mvp-comment-231-1
τίνα … τόνδ’
340
mvp-comment-231-2
τάλαινα
341
mvp-comment-232-1
εἴ τι τῶνδε
342
mvp-comment-233-1
ποῦ ποτ’ εἶ φρενῶν
343
mvp-comment-234-1
ὅπως
344
ὑμῶν
345
mvp-comment-234-2
προσώτατ’
346
προσωτάτω φύγω
347
mvp-comment-235-1
βίου … τοῦ παρόντος
348
mvp-comment-236-1
καλὸς γὰρ
349
mvp-comment-236-2
θαυμάσαι
350
mvp-comment-237-1
τοῖς φίλοις
351
mvp-comment-238-1
εἰκαθεῖν
352
mvp-comment-239-1
ταῦτα
353
οὐκ ἐμοὺς
354
mvp-comment-240-1
γε
355
μέντοι
356
mvp-comment-240-2
μὴ )ξ
357
mvp-comment-240-3
πεσεῖν
358
mvp-comment-240-4
399 A woman, speaking of herself in the plur., uses the masc.:
Ant. 926
παθόντες ἂν ξυγγνοῖμεν ἡμαρτηκότες
.
mvp-comment-241-1
συγγνώμην
359
mvp-comment-242-1
τἄπη
360
mvp-comment-242-2
πρὸς κακῶν
361
mvp-comment-243-1
μή πω
362
mvp-comment-244-1
οἷπερ … ὁδοῦ
363
mvp-comment-245-1
τῷ φέρεις
364
mvp-comment-245-2
ἔμπυρα
365
mvp-comment-246-1
τυμβεῦσαι χοάς
366
mvp-comment-247-1
βροτῶν
367
mvp-comment-248-1
ὃν ἔκταν’ αὐτή
368
ὅν γ’
369
mvp-comment-249-1
τῷ τοῦτ’ ἤρεσεν
370
mvp-comment-250-1
δείματος
371
mvp-comment-250-2
δοκεῖν ἐμοί
372
mvp-comment-251-1
θεοὶ πατρῷοι
373
mvp-comment-251-2
συγγένεσθέ γ’
374
mvp-comment-251-3
ἀλλὰ νῦν
375
mvp-comment-252-1
εἴποιμ’ ἂν τότε
376
mvp-comment-253-1
ἐπὶ σμικρὸν
377
ἐπὶ σμικρῶν
378
mvp-comment-253-2
φράσαι
379
mvp-comment-254-1
σμικροὶ λόγοι
380
mvp-comment-255-1
πατρὸς … δευτέραν ὁμιλίαν
381
mvp-comment-255-2
ἐφέστιον πῆξαι
382
mvp-comment-255-3
This sceptre is described in the
Iliad (2. 101 f.) as the work of Hephaestus, who gave it Zeus; Hermes transmitted it to Pelops, from whom it passed to Atreus and Agamemnon. The Homeric sceptre is often called
χρύσεον
(
Il. 2. 268
, etc.), prob. as being ornamented with gold foil, or studded with gold nails (
Il. 1. 246
χρυσείοις ἥλοισι πεπαρμένον
). Among the objects found at Mycenae are some supposed remains of such sceptres (Schliem.,
Myc. 201, etc.).
mvp-comment-255-4
οὑφόρει ποτέ
383
mvp-comment-256-1
ἔκ τε
384
ἐκ δὲ
385
mvp-comment-256-2
βρύοντα
386
mvp-comment-256-3
ᾧ … γενέσθαι
387
mvp-comment-256-4
The vision resembles that of Astyages, who dreamed that a vine sprang from his daughter Mandanè, the wife of Cambyses,
τὴν δὲ ἄμπελον ἐπισχεῖν τὴν Ἀσίην πᾶσαν
. The
ὀνειροπόλοι
explained this to mean that her son (Cyrus) should reign in his grandfather's stead. (
Her. 1. 108.
) The spreading branches figure also in the dream of Xerxes (7. 19):
ἐδόκεε...ἐστεφανῶσθαι ἐλαίης θαλλῷ, ἀπὸ δὲ τῆς ἐλαίης τοὺς κλάδους γῆν πᾶσαν ἐπισχεῖν
.
mvp-comment-256-5
In choosing the
sceptre of Agamemnon as the stock from which the wondrous growth is put forth, Sophocles may have had in mind the words of Achilles (
Il. 1. 234
ff.);
ναὶ μὰ τόδε σκῆπτρον· τὸ μὲν οὔποτε φύλλα καὶ ὄζους
|
φύσει, ἐπεὶ δὴ πρῶτα τομὴν ἐν ὄρεσσι λέλοιπεν
, |
οὐδ’ ἀναθηλήσει
.
mvp-comment-257-1
του παρόντος
388
τοῦ
389
παρόντος
390
του
391
mvp-comment-257-2
Ἡλίῳ δείκνυσι τοὖναρ
392
mvp-comment-258-1
οὐ κάτοιδα, πλὴν
393
mvp-comment-258-2
πέμπει με κείνη
394
mvp-comment-259-1
These three verses, which the MSS. give to Electra, and which several recent critics reject (cr. n.), clearly belong to Chrysothemis, and are genuine. Electra's exclamation of joy (411) caused Chrysothemis to ask if her sister had any ground for hope (412). Electra replied that, when she had heard the dream, she would say. This showed her sister that Electra relied merely on the fact that Clytaemnestra had seen
some fearful vision. Now, therefore, instead of asking for Electra's interpretation, she merely repeats her counsel (383 f.) before proceeding on her errand. The words
πρός
νυν θεῶν κ.τ.λ.
(428 ff.) show the train of her thought. To Chrysothemis, the alarm of Clytaemnestra (427) is more important than the apparition of Agamemnon. The dream is only a new reason why Electra should be cautious,—not why she should hope.
mvp-comment-259-2
The current ascription of the verses to Electra was doubtless prompted by verse 413. It was supposed that the recital of Chrysothemis must be immediately followed by the comments of Electra. But, as Hermann observed, the phrase
ἀβουλίᾳ πεσεῖν
would alone suffice to show that the verses belong to Chrysothemis (
cp. 398
). Nor could the warning,
σὺν κακῷ μέτει πάλιν
, be fitly uttered by Electra.
mvp-comment-259-3
τῶν ἐγγενῶν
395
mvp-comment-260-1
ἀβουλίᾳ
396
mvp-comment-260-2
σὺν κακῷ
397
mvp-comment-260-3
μέτει
398
mvp-comment-261-1
ἀλλ’
399
mvp-comment-261-2
ὦ φίλη
400
τούτων μὲν
401
mvp-comment-262-1
οὐ … θέμις
402
οὐδ’ ὅσιον
403
mvp-comment-262-2
ἐχθρᾶς ἀπὸ γυναικὸς
404
mvp-comment-262-3
κτερίσματ’
405
mvp-comment-262-4
λουτρὰ
406
mvp-comment-263-1
ἀλλ’ ἢ πνοαῖσιν
407
ῥοαῖσιν
408
mvp-comment-263-2
κρύψον
409
mvp-comment-263-3
νιν
410
mvp-comment-263-4
ἔνθα μή ποτ’
411
ἔνθεν
412
mvp-comment-263-5
εὐνὴν
413
mvp-comment-264-1
ἀλλ’ ὅταν θάῃν
414
mvp-comment-264-2
The conjecture
ἔστ’ ἂν
415
ὅταν
416
σῳζέσθω
417
mvp-comment-264-3
κειμήλἰ
418
mvp-comment-265-1
ἀρχὴν
419
τλημονεστάτη
420
mvp-comment-266-1
ἔβλαστε
421
mvp-comment-267-1
ὅν γ’ … τῷδ’
422
mvp-comment-267-2
ἐπέστεφε
423
mvp-comment-267-3
442 f. The position of
αὐτῇ
424
mvp-comment-267-4
δέξεσθαι
425
mvp-comment-267-5
It seems, then, a reasonable inference that here, where the reference is to future time, he would have written
δέξεσθαι
426
δέξασθαι
427
mvp-comment-267-6
444 ff. Join
θανὼν ἄτιμος
428
mvp-comment-267-7
ἐμασχαλίσθη
429
mvp-comment-267-8
Two different motives are assigned by the Greek commentators; viz.:—(1) the desire to render the dead incapable of wreaking vengeance (
ὥσπερ τὴν δύναμιν ἐκείνων ἀφαιρούμενοι
): (2) the desire to make an atonement (
ἐξιλάσασθαι τὴν δολοφονίαν—ἀφοσιοῦσθαι τὸν φόνον
). There can be little doubt that the first of these motives was the primitive origin of the custom. If the second was afterwards blended with it, the idea may have been that of offering the severed portions to the gods below,—as a victim was devoted to death by cutting off a lock of hair (
Eur.
Alc. 75
). Apollonius Rhodius seems to present the practice in this light (4. 477): Jason, having slain a foe,
ἐξάργματα τάμνε θανόντος
. Cp.
Etym. Magn.:
ἀπάργματα λέγεται τὰ ὑπὸ τῶν τραγῳδῶν λεγόμενα μασχαλίσματα
.
mvp-comment-267-9
κἀπὶ λουτροῖσιν
430
mvp-comment-267-10
ἐξέμαξ ν
431
mvp-comment-267-11
ἆρα μὴ
432
mvp-comment-268-1
οὐκ ἔστιν
433
mvp-comment-268-2
ταῦτα μὲν μέθες· σὺ δὲ
434
mvp-comment-269-1
βοστρύχων ἄκρας φόβας
435
mvp-comment-269-2
κἀμοῦ ταλαίνης
436
mvp-comment-270-1
†ἀλιπαρῆ
437
λιπαρῆ
438
mvp-comment-270-2
We come, therefore, to a dilemma. (1) The words
τήνδ’ ἀλιπαρῆ τρίχα
may conceal some corruption:
τήνδ’
ought possibly to be
τήνδε τ’
439
ἀλίπαρον
440
mvp-comment-270-3
(2) Or else, if the text be sound,
ἀλιπαρῆ
may mean
οὐ λιπαράν
. There is no doubt that
λιπ
, ‘fat,’ is the root both of
λι^παρός
, ‘shining,’ and of
λι—παρής
, ‘sticking’; cp.
Plat.
Crat. 427 B
τὸ λιπαρὸν καὶ τὸ κολλῶδες
(
Curt.
Etym. § 340
). Similarly
γλίσχρος
, ‘sticky,’ came to mean ‘importunate.’ It is barely possible that, in coining a new negative compound, the poet may have transferred the sense of
λιπαρός
to
λιπαρής
: but it seems improbable.
mvp-comment-271-1
ζῶμα
441
mvp-comment-271-2
χλιδαῖς
442
mvp-comment-272-1
προσπίτνουσα
443
αὐτὸν
444
mvp-comment-273-1
ἐξ ὑπερτέρας χερός
445
mvp-comment-273-2
ζῶντ’
446
mvp-comment-274-1
ἀφνεωτέραις
447
mvp-comment-274-2
στέφωμεν
448
mvp-comment-274-3
δωρούμεθα
449
mvp-comment-275-1
οἶμαι μὲν οὖν
450
mvp-comment-275-2
If
μέλον
451
μέλειν
452
μέλον
453
mvp-comment-276-1
σοί
454
mvp-comment-277-1
βροτῶν
455
mvp-comment-278-1
πρὸς εὐσέβειαν
456
mvp-comment-279-1
δράσω
457
mvp-comment-279-2
τὸ γὰρ δίκαιον
458
mvp-comment-279-3
(1)
τὸ δίκαιον
is an acc. of general reference, and
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
is impersonal. ‘With regard to what is (clearly) right, it is unreasonable for two persons to dispute; rather both should hasten on the doing (of it).’ With
ἀλλ’ ἐπισπεύδειν
we supply the notion
δεῖ
from the negative
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
(as from
οὐκ ἔξεστι
in
O. C. 1402
ff.; cp.
O. T. 817
ff.). For the form of the sentence, cp.
H. 7. 3. 7
τοὺς περὶ Ἀρχίαν...οὐ ψῆφον ἀνεμείνατε, ἀλλὰ ὁπότε πρῶτον ἐδυνάσθητε ἐτιμωρήσασθε
. So here the acc.
τὸ δίκαιον
, which represents the object of
δρᾶν
, is separated from it by the parenthesis
οὐκ
ἔχει λόγον δυοῖν ἐρίζειν
. (The first scholium gives substantially this view:
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον φιλονεικεῖν περὶ τοῦ δικαίου, ὥστε περὶ αὐτοῦ δύο ὄντας ἐρίζειν
.)
mvp-comment-279-4
(2) Or
τὸ δίκαιον
might be nom.: ‘that which is clearly right does not
afford any ground (
οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
) for two persons to dispute,’ etc. So the second schol.:
ἢ τὸ οὐκ ἔχει λόγον ἀντὶ τοῦ οὐ παρέχει πρόφασιν
. So far as the verb
ἔχει
is concerned, this sense is quite admissible: cp.
Thuc. 2. 41
οὔτε τῷ πολεμίῳ ἐπελθόντι ἀγανάκτησιν ἔχει
(
ἡ πόλις
). The objection is that the phrases
ἔχειν λόγον, οὐκ ἔχειν λόγον
, which are very common, regularly mean, ‘to be reasonable,’ ‘to be unreasonable.’ This is so both in the personal and in the impersonal constr.; as Plat.
Phaedop. 62 D
τὸ γὰρ μὴ ἀγανακτεῖν...οὐκ ἔχει λόγον
:
Dem. or. 36 § 54
πῶς ἔχει λόγον σὲ...δίκην ἀξιοῦν λαμβάνειν
; The supposed sense, ‘not to
afford a reason,’ is unexampled.
mvp-comment-279-5
δυοῖν
459
mvp-comment-280-1
παρ’ ὑμῶν
460
mvp-comment-281-1
πικρὰν
461
δοκῶ με … τολμήσειν
462
ἔτι
463
mvp-comment-282-1
εἰ μὴ )γὼ
464
mvp-comment-282-2
γνώμας λειπομένα
465
mvp-comment-283-1
ἁ πρόμαντις Δίκα
466
mvp-comment-283-2
δίκαια φερομένα χεροῖν κράτη
467
mvp-comment-284-1
μέτεισιν
468
mvp-comment-284-2
οὐ μακροῦ χρόνου
469
mvp-comment-285-1
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
470
κλύουσαν
471
mvp-comment-285-2
ἁδυπνόων … ὀνειράτων
472
mvp-comment-286-1
ἀμναστεῖ γ’ ὁ φύσας ς’
473
mvp-comment-287-1
χαλκόπλακτος
474
mvp-comment-287-2
γένυς
475
mvp-comment-287-3
The very axe (
φόνιος πέλεκυς
, 99) with which the blow was dealt is imagined as nourishing a grudge against the murderers who had set it such a task. Such a personification recalls that practice of Athenian law by which inanimate objects which had caused death were brought to a formal trial in the court called
τὸ ἐπὶ Πρυτανείῳ
, and, after sentence, cast beyond the boundaries, in the presence of the Archon Basileus and the sacrificial officers of the tribes (
φυλο‐
βασιλεῖς
). Aeschin. or. 3 § 244
τὰ μὲν ξύλα καὶ τοὺς λίθους καὶ τὸν σίδηρον, τὰ ἄφωνα καὶ ἀγνώμονα, ἐάν τῳ ἐμπεσόντα ἀποκτείνῃ, ὑπερορίζομεν
. (Cp.
Dem. or. 23 § 76
.) A like conception was implied in the English law (repealed in 1846) of ‘deodands’ (Deo danda),
i.e., personal chattels (whether animals or things) which, having caused the death of a human being, were forfeited to the Crown for pious uses.
mvp-comment-288-1
ἐν αἰκίαις
476
mvp-comment-289-1
καὶ πολύπους καὶ πολύχειρ
477
mvp-comment-290-1
λόχοις
478
mvp-comment-290-2
χαλκόπους
479
mvp-comment-291-1
ἄλεκτρ’ ἄνυμφα
480
mvp-comment-291-2
γάμων ἁμιλλήμαθ’
481
mvp-comment-291-3
ἐπέβα
482
mvp-comment-292-1
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι … συνδρῶσιν
483
mvp-comment-292-2
Verses 495—497 (
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι...τέρας
) answer metrically to vv. 479—481
ὕπεστί μοι...ὀνειράτων
, where the text is certain, save for the doubt whether
θράσος
or
θάρσος
should stand in 479. Here we must first decide two points.
mvp-comment-292-3
(1) Are the words
πρὸ τῶνδε
484
mvp-comment-292-4
(2) Could
ἔχει με, μήποτε τέρας πελᾶν
(etc.) mean, ‘
the belief possesses me, that’ etc.? Surely not. No real parallel for so strange a phrase has been produced. It is irrelevant to quote those impersonal verbs which directly express the
occurrence of a thought to the mind; as
Xen.
An. 6. 1. 17
εἰσῄει αὐτοὺς ὅπως ἂν καὶ ἔχοντές τι οἴκαδε ἀφίκοιντο
(‘the thought came to them, how they might,’ etc.):
Thuc. 6. 78.
§ 1
εἰ δέ τῳ ἄρα παρέστηκε, τὸν μὲν Συρακόσιον...πολέμιον εἶναι κ.τ.λ.
Either, then, the subject to
ἔχει
has dropped out, or the words
μ’ ἔχει
conceal a corruption.
mvp-comment-292-5
The following remedies are possible: I incline to the first, as involving least change. (1) Reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θράσος
, we may read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοί μ’ ἔχει
|
<θάρσος τι>, μήποθ’ ἡμῖν
etc. (It may be remarked that
τι
is in harmony with the tone of
ὕπεστί μοι
in 479.) Another available word is
ξύννοια
(cp.
Ant. 279
). (2) Or, reading in 479
ὕπεστί μοι θάρσος
, we could read here
πρὸ τῶνδέ τοι θάρσος ἴσχει με
. On either view, the
υ
of
ἁδυπνόων
in 480 is long (as several critics have assumed). It should be noted that (1) involves a different constitution of the verses: see p. lxxxii.
mvp-comment-292-6
In those MSS. which have
μή ποτε μή ποθ’ ἡμῖν
485
mvp-comment-293-1
ἀψεγές
486
ἀψεφές
487
mvp-comment-293-2
πελᾶν
488
mvp-comment-294-1
τοῖς δρῶσι
489
τοῖς συνδρῶσιν
490
mvp-comment-295-1
μαντεῖαι βροτῶν
491
mvp-comment-296-1
εὖ κατασχήσει
492
mvp-comment-297-1
ἱππεία
493
mvp-comment-297-2
Oenomaüs, king of Pisa in Elis, had promised the hand of his daughter Hippodameia to the suitor who should defeat him in a chariot-race; the penalty of failure being death. The young Pelops, son of Tantalus, offered himself as a competitor. Myrtilus, the charioteer of Oenomaüs, was persuaded (either by Hippodameia or by Pelops) to betray his master. He did so by leaving out one or both of the linch-pins by which the naves of the chariot-wheels were secured to the axles.
Tzetzes on Lycophron 156
ταῖς χοινίκισι
(=
πλήμναις
, the naves)
τῶν τροχῶν οὐκ ἐμβαλὼν τοὺς ἥλους
. According to another story, he substituted a linch-pin of wax for a real one (
schol. Apoll. Rh. 752
ἐμβαλόντα κήρινον ἔμβολον ἐπὶ τοῦ ἀκραξονίου
). So Pelops won the race, and the bride. But Oenomaüs was soon avenged on the traitor; for Myrtilus insulted Hippodameia, and was thrown into the sea by Pelops; upon whose house he invoked a curse, as he sank.
mvp-comment-297-3
Euripides, too, (
Or. 990
ff.,
Helen. 386 f.) refers to this chariot-race as the event with which the troubles of the Pelopidae began. Apollonius Rhodius briefly describes the critical moment of the race as one of the subjects embroidered on the cloak of Jason (1. 752 ff.); there Oenomaüs was seen, ‘falling sideways, as the axle broke at the naves of the wheels,’—
ἄξονος ἐν πλήμνῃσι παρακλιδὸν ἀγνυμένοιο
|
πίπτεν
.
mvp-comment-297-4
The eastern pediment of the temple of Zeus at Olympia (
circ. 450 B.C.) was adorned with sculptures by Paeonius, representing the preparation for this contest (
Paus. 5. 10. 6
). The fragments found on the site have sufficed for a reconstruction of the group. Zeus occupied the centre; to the right of him were Pelops and Hippodameia; to the left, Oenomaüs and his wife Steropè. On each side was a chariot drawn by four horses. Myrtilus was sitting in front of his team, with his face turned away from his master.
mvp-comment-297-5
In the older and nobler form of the myth, Pelops won, not by a fraud, but by the grace of Poseidon, who gave him winged horses (Pindar
O. 1. 87
ἔδωκεν δίφρον τε χούσεον πτεροῖσίν τ’ ἀκάμαντας ἵππους
). On the chest (
λάρναξ
) of Cypselus, seen by Pausanias in the Heraeum at Olympia (
Paus. 5. 17. 5
), Pelops was driving two winged horses.
mvp-comment-298-1
αἰανὴς
494
mvp-comment-298-2
The form
αἰανὴς
has the best authority, and some critics hold that
αἰανὸς
(Hesych.) was a Byzantine invention. But in
Aesch.
Eum. 416
,
ἡμεῖς γάρ ἐσμεν νυκτὸς αἰανῆς τέκνα
(so L, schol., and Tzetzes on Lycophron 406),
αἰανῆ
is far less suitable.
mvp-comment-299-1
εὖτε
495
mvp-comment-299-2
ὁ ποντισθεὶς Μυρτίλος
496
mvp-comment-299-3
A vase found at Capua shows Pelops and Hippodameia in a ship, from which Myrtilus is falling backwards into the water. A winged Erinys hovers in the air above, brandishing a sword over the head of Pelops (Baumeister,
Denkmäler p. 1204, referring to
Mon. Inst. x. 25).
mvp-comment-299-4
ἐκοιμάθη
497
mvp-comment-300-1
παγχρυσέων δίφρων
498
mvp-comment-301-1
πρόρριζος
499
mvp-comment-301-2
ἐκριφθείς
500
mvp-comment-302-1
ἔλειπεν
501
ἔλιπεν
502
οἴκου
503
οἴκους
504
πω
505
mvp-comment-303-1
πολύπονος
506
αἰκία
507
mvp-comment-304-1
ἀνειμένη
508
μέν
509
mvp-comment-304-2
ὡς ἔοικας
510
mvp-comment-304-3
στρέφει
511
mvp-comment-304-4
Clytaemnestra begins in the same strain as Chrysothemis, who likewise emphasised her reproof by the word
αὖ
512
mvp-comment-305-1
μή τοι θυραίαν γ’
513
mvp-comment-305-2
αἰσχύνειν φίλους
514
mvp-comment-306-1
καίτοι
515
mvp-comment-306-2
δὴ
516
πολλούς
517
mvp-comment-306-3
ἐξεῖπάς με … ὡς
518
mvp-comment-306-4
θρασεῖα
519
τραχεῖα
520
mvp-comment-306-5
ἄρχω
521
mvp-comment-307-1
ὕβριν … οὐκ ἔχω
522
κακῶς κλύουσα
523
mvp-comment-308-1
πατὴρ γάρ
524
mvp-comment-308-2
πρόσχημα
525
mvp-comment-309-1
ἡ γὰρ Δίκη
526
mvp-comment-310-1
ᾗ χρῆν σ’ ἀρήγειν
527
mvp-comment-311-1
The order of words in the MSS.,
ἐπεὶ πατὴρ οὗτος σός
, is probably right; the words would then fall from her with a certain deliberate bitterness.
Cp. 542
:
Ant. 44
ἦ γὰρ νοεῖς θάπτειν σθ’
(n.):
Ph. 101
λέγω σ’ ἐγὼ δόλῳ Φιλοκτήτην λαβεῖν
.
mvp-comment-312-1
μοῦνος
528
Ἑλλήνων
529
mvp-comment-312-2
Nauck requires
τὴν αὐτὸς αὑτοῦ
instead of
τὴν σὴν ὅμαιμον
, because Agamemnon's unique crime was the slaughter of his own child: as if the text did not convey this. Clytaemnestra means, ‘while mourning a father, you forget a sister.’
mvp-comment-312-3
532 f. The regular mode of expression would be,
οὐκ ἴσον λύπης καμὼν ἐμοί, ὁ σπείρας τῇ τικτούσῃ
. But, having written
ὅτ’ ἔσπειρε
, the poet explains
ἐμοί
by repeating the comparison in a new form,
ὥσπερ ἡ τίκτουσ’ ἐγώ
. (For
ὡς
or
ὥσπερ
after
ἴσος
, cp.
Lys. or. 19 § 36
ἡγοῦντο... τὰ ἐκεῖ...εἶναι ἴσα ὥσπερ τὰ ἐνθάδε
.) Those who reject v. 533 omit to notice that, without it, the words
οὐκ ἴσον καμὼν ἐμοί
would be unintelligible. Cp.
Aesch.
Ag. 1417
ἔθυσεν αὑτοῦ παῖδα, φιλτάτην ἐμοὶ
|
ὠδῖν’
.
mvp-comment-312-4
This assertion of the mother's superior claim is a counterpart to the doctrine of Athena in
Aesch.
Eum. 658
f.,
οὐκ ἔστι μήτηρ ἡ κεκλημένου τέκνου
|
τοκεύς, τροφὸς δὲ κύματος νεοσπόρου
. Cp. above,
Aesch. Eum. 366
n.
mvp-comment-313-1
τοῦ χάριν, τίνων
530
mvp-comment-313-2
The alternative, which most editors have preferred, is to take
τίνων
as the participle. But there is an insuperable objection to this, which seems to have escaped notice. The words,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could mean only, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
for what?’ They could not mean, ‘paying a debt of gratitude
to whom?’ The latter would be
τῷ χάριν τίνων
; See (
e.g.)
Aesch.
P. V. 985
καὶ μὴν ὀφείλων ἂν τίνοιμ’ αὐτῷ χάριν
:
Aesch.
Ag. 821
τούτων θεοῖσι χρὴ πολύμνηστον χάριν
|
τίνειν
. Hence the question,
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
; could not possibly be answered by
Ἀργείων
. For, evidently, the latter word could not mean, (‘for a benefit conferred by) the Greeks.’ A scholiast in the Baroccian MS. (cr. n. on 545), who explains
τοῦ χάριν τίνων
by
τίνος χάριν ἀποδιδούς
, plainly meant, ‘showing gratitude for what?’—and his paraphrase was correct; only he overlooked the context.
mvp-comment-314-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ μετῆν
531
mvp-comment-315-1
ἀλλ’ ἀντ’ ἀδελφοῦ δῆτα
532
κτανὼν
533
mvp-comment-315-2
ἀντὶ ἀδελφοῦ
534
mvp-comment-315-3
τἄμ’
535
mvp-comment-316-1
παῖδες … διπλοῖ
536
mvp-comment-316-2
540 f. Nauck would prefer a single verse in place of these two, viz.
οὓς Ἰφιγενείας εἰκὸς ἦν θνῄσκειν πάρος
.
mvp-comment-317-1
ἢ
537
mvp-comment-317-2
ἢ τῶν ἐμῶν Ἅιδης
538
mvp-comment-318-1
δαίσασθαι
539
mvp-comment-318-2
The conj.
λῄσασθαι
540
mvp-comment-319-1
πανώλει
541
mvp-comment-319-2
παρεῖτο
542
mvp-comment-319-3
The sense does not absolutely require us to take
Μενέλεω δ’
543
mvp-comment-320-1
ἀβούλου
544
mvp-comment-320-2
κακοῦ γνώμην
545
mvp-comment-321-1
δοκῶ μέν
546
mvp-comment-321-2
εἰ καὶ
547
mvp-comment-322-1
εἰ φωνὴν λάβοι
548
mvp-comment-323-1
τοῖς πεπραγμένοις
549
mvp-comment-324-1
γνώμην δικαίαν σχοῦσα
550
mvp-comment-325-1
ἐρεῖς μὲν οὐχὶ
551
ἐρεῖς
552
ἐρεῖς … μ’ ὡς
553
mvp-comment-325-2
ἄρξασά τι λυπηρὸν
554
mvp-comment-325-3
τάδ’ ἐξήκους’
555
mvp-comment-326-1
τοῦ τεθνηκότος θ’ ὕπερ
556
mvp-comment-327-1
καὶ μὴν
557
mvp-comment-327-2
λόγους ἐξῆρχές με
558
mvp-comment-328-1
Clytaemnestra has argued that she was justified in slaying Agamemnon, because he had slain Iphigeneia. The topics of Electra's reply are as follows.
mvp-comment-328-2
(1) 558—562. The wife who slew her husband would be a criminal, even if the motive had been just retribution; but the real motive was her love for Aegisthus. (2) 563—576. Agamemnon was not a free agent in slaying Iphigeneia; the act was forced upon him by Artemis. (3) 577—583. Suppose, however, that he was a free agent, and wished to please his brother; still she was not justified in taking his life. (4) 584—594. And in any case her plea does not excuse her for living with the man who helped to slay her husband.—The speech then closes in a strain of reproach and defiance (595 —609).
mvp-comment-328-3
καὶ δὴ λέγω σοι
559
πατέρα
560
φὴς
561
mvp-comment-329-1
εἴτ’ οὖν … εἴτε
562
mvp-comment-329-2
λέξω
563
δείξω
564
mvp-comment-330-1
ὡς οὐ δίκῃ γ’
565
ἔσπασεν
566
πειθὼ
567
mvp-comment-331-1
κυναγὸν
568
mvp-comment-331-2
ποινὰς
569
mvp-comment-331-3
τὰ πολλὰ πνεύματ’ ἔσχ’
570
τὰ πολλὰ
571
ἔσχε
572
mvp-comment-331-4
Acc. to Aesch. (
Aesch.
Ag. 149
f.,
Aesch. Ag. 192
), the Greeks were detained by
adverse winds, blowing from the N.E. : and this seems to have been the account given in the
Cypria (
c. 776 B.C.), Proclus
Chrest. p. 455:
ἐπέσχεν αὐτοὺς τοῦ πλοῦ χειμῶνας ἐπιπέμπουσα
. But other authorities speak of a
calm. Thus
I. A. 9 ff.
οὔκουν φθόγγος γ’ οὔτ’ ὀρνίθων
|
οὔτε θαλάσσης· σιγαὶ δ’ ἀνέμων
|
τόνδε κατ’ Εὔριπον ἔχουσιν
. Schol.
Eur.
Or. 647
ἐπειράθη τῆς θεοῦ ὀργιζομένης καὶ κατεχούσης τοὺς ἀνέμους
. Tzetzes on Lycophron 183
χολωθεῖσα δ’ ἐπὶ τούτῳ ἡ θεὸς τοὺς ἀνέμους κατέσχεν
. Ovid (
Met. 13. 183
) combines both versions:
exspectata diu, nulla aut contraria classi | Flamina sunt.
mvp-comment-331-5
It has been objected that vessels provided with oars need not have been detained by a calm. But the ships of the Greek fleet were not light craft. Each carried from 50 to 120 armed men, besides
σκεύη πολεμικά
: and the warriors were also the rowers (cp.
Thuc. 1. 10
). It is intelligible, then, that they should await the aid of wind before attempting the passage of the Aegaean. We must remember, too, the strong and shifting currents in the Euripus (
στονόεντα πορθμόν
,
Soph.
Ant. 1145
:
παλιρρόχθοις ἐν Αὐλίδος τόποις
,
Aesch.
Ag. 191
).
mvp-comment-331-6
We cannot well render:—(1)‘He
suffered those tedious winds,’—supplying
ὁ πατήρ
from v. 558. Nor: (2) ‘She
directed those tedious winds at Aulis,’—a version which would at least require
ἐπ’ Αὐλίδι
. Cp.
Ph. 1119
ἔχε
|
δύσποτμον ἀρὰν ἐπ’ ἄλλοις
.
mvp-comment-331-7
The conjecture
πλοῖα
573
mvp-comment-331-8
Αὐλίδι
574
mvp-comment-332-1
ἢ )γὼ φράσω
575
κείνης
576
mvp-comment-333-1
ὡς ἐγὼ κλύω
577
mvp-comment-333-2
θεᾶς … κατ’ ἄλσος
578
mvp-comment-333-3
παίζων
579
mvp-comment-333-4
ποδοῖν
580
mvp-comment-334-1
ἔλαφον
581
mvp-comment-334-2
στικτὸν
582
mvp-comment-334-3
κεράστην
583
mvp-comment-334-4
οὗ κατὰ σφαγὰς
584
mvp-comment-335-1
ἐκκομπάσας ἔπος τι τυγχάνει
585
βαλών
586
mvp-comment-335-2
This is the reason against taking
τυγχάνει
with
βαλών
, as=‘he shoots and hits’; cp.
Il. 15. 581
θηρητὴρ ἐτύχησε βαλών
:
Her. 3. 35
εἰ...τοῦ παιδὸς...βαλὼν τύχοιμι
. The vaunt must then
precede the hit.
mvp-comment-335-3
Others take
βαλὼν
587
ἔπος
588
mvp-comment-335-4
Monk, with Musgrave, took
σφαγὰς
589
mvp-comment-336-1
ἐκ τοῦδε
590
mvp-comment-336-2
μηνίσασα
591
mvp-comment-336-3
Λητῴα κόρη
592
mvp-comment-337-1
ὡς
593
ἀντίσταθμον
594
mvp-comment-337-2
ἐκθύσειε
595
mvp-comment-338-1
ὧδ’ ἦν
596
mvp-comment-338-2
τὰ … θύματ’
597
mvp-comment-338-3
λύσις
598
mvp-comment-338-4
πρὸς οἶκον
599
mvp-comment-339-1
πολλὰ
600
mvp-comment-339-2
ἀντιβὰς
601
mvp-comment-339-3
μόλις
602
mvp-comment-340-1
εἰ δ’ οὖν
603
mvp-comment-340-2
ἐρῶ γὰρ καὶ τὸ σόν
604
mvp-comment-341-1
τούτου … οὕνεκ’
605
mvp-comment-341-2
νόμῳ
606
mvp-comment-342-1
ὅρα
607
μὴ … τιθῇς
608
τίθης
609
mvp-comment-342-2
Here, either
τίθης
or
τιθῇς
would be suitable. (1) With
τίθης
:—‘See that, in making this rule, you
are not making woe for yourself.’ This means that to make the rule (as she is doing) is at once (logically) to make the woe. (2) With
τιθῇς
: —‘See
lest, in making this rule, you
make woe for yourself’:
i.e., the rule may have the woe as a consequence. The woe is a future contingency (583
εἰ δίκης γε τυγχάνοις
), against which Electra warns her. On the whole, I now prefer
τιθῇς
.
Cp. 1003
ὅρα κακῶς πράσσοντε μὴ μείζω κακὰ
|
κτησώμεθ’
: fr. 82
ἀλλ’ ὅρα μὴ κρεῖσσον ᾖ
.
mvp-comment-342-3
τιθεῖσα … νόμον
610
mvp-comment-343-1
εἰ γὰρ κτενοῦμεν
611
mvp-comment-343-2
πρώτη
612
mvp-comment-344-1
εἰσόρα
613
mvp-comment-344-2
οὐκ οὖσαν
614
mvp-comment-344-3
τίθης
615
mvp-comment-344-4
εἰ … θέλεις
616
mvp-comment-345-1
τῷ παλαμναίῳ
617
mvp-comment-345-2
πρόσθεν ἐξαπώλεσας
618
mvp-comment-346-1
παιδοποιεῖς
619
mvp-comment-346-2
Erigonè, daughter of Aegisthus and Clytaemnestra (Tzetzes on
Lyc. 1374
), was mentioned by the early cyclic poet Cinaethon (
Paus. 2. 18. 6
), and was the theme of Sophocles in his
Ἠριγόνη
. Hyginus (
Hyg.
Fab. 122
) notices a son of Aegisthus named Aletes, who gives his name to a play by Sophocles, but does not record the mother: see p. xliii note 4.
mvp-comment-346-3
εὐσεβεῖς
620
mvp-comment-346-4
κἀξ εὐσεβῶν
621
mvp-comment-346-5
By
τοὺς...πρόσθεν εὐσεβεῖς
Electra means Orestes and herself. Both are ‘cast out’ of their just rights. Cp.
O.T. 611
φίλον ...ἐσθλὸν ἐκβαλεῖν
.
Eur.
El. 62
τεκοῦσα δ’ ἄλλους παῖδας Αἰγίσθῳ πάρα
|
πάρεργ’ Ὀρέστην κἀμὲ ποιεῖται δόμων.
mvp-comment-346-6
βλαστόντας
622
mvp-comment-346-7
ἐκβαλοῦσ’ ἔχεις
623
mvp-comment-347-1
πῶς ταῦτ’ ἐπαινέσαιμ’ ἄν
624
mvp-comment-347-2
ἢ
625
ἦ
626
καὶ τοῦτ’
627
ἄποινα
628
mvp-comment-348-1
αἰσχρῶς δ’
629
δ’
630
mvp-comment-348-2
ἐάν περ καὶ λέγῃς
631
mvp-comment-348-3
ἐχθροῖς γαμεῖσθαι
632
mvp-comment-348-4
These two verses, though not indispensable, seem genuine. Were they omitted, the transition from 592 to 595 would be somewhat abrupt.
mvp-comment-349-1
ἀλλ’ οὐ γὰρ
633
mvp-comment-349-2
πᾶσαν ἵης γλῶσσαν
634
mvp-comment-350-1
κακοστομοῦμεν
635
mvp-comment-350-2
καί σ’ ἔγωγε δεσπότιν
636
mvp-comment-350-3
εἰς ἡμᾶς
637
ἣ
638
mvp-comment-351-1
βίον μοχθηρόν
639
mvp-comment-351-2
ἔκ τε σοῦ
640
κακοῖς … ξυνοῦσα
641
mvp-comment-351-3
συννόμου
642
mvp-comment-352-1
ὁ δ’ ἄλλος
643
mvp-comment-352-2
χεῖρα σὴν
644
mvp-comment-352-3
τρίβει βίον
645
mvp-comment-352-4
603 The reason for writing
δή με σοὶ
646
δή μέ σοι
647
mvp-comment-352-5
μιάστορα
648
mvp-comment-353-1
τοῦδέ γ’ οὕνεκα
649
mvp-comment-354-1
εἰς ἅπαντας
650
mvp-comment-354-2
χρῇς
651
mvp-comment-354-3
στόμαργον
652
mvp-comment-355-1
τῶνδε τῶν ἔ|ργων ἴδρις
653
mvp-comment-355-2
σχεδόν τι
654
mvp-comment-355-3
οὐ καταισχύνω
655
mvp-comment-356-1
ὁρῶ μένος πνέουσαν
656
μένος πνέουσαν
657
mvp-comment-356-2
σὺν δίκῃ ξύνεστι
658
mvp-comment-356-3
Other interpretations are:—(1) ‘I see that Electra is wroth; but as to whether she is in the right, I see no concern (anywhere),’—a timid way of saying that
Clytaemnestra shows no such concern. So the schol. (2) ‘I see that Clytaemnestra is angry, but not that she cares whether she is right’:—an inference from some gesture. Both these versions rely on the fact that
φροντίδος
(612) is plainly an echo of
φροντίδ’
(611). But: (
a) it does not follow that
φροντίδ’
is not
Electra's thought. (
b) It is surely clear that
πνέουσαν
must be Electra; and (
c) as in
Ant. 471
f., the second clause naturally refers to the same person.
mvp-comment-357-1
ποίας δ’ ἐμοὶ δεῖ
659
ἐμοὶ
660
μοι
661
δεῖ
662
mvp-comment-357-2
Others understand: (1) ‘If Electra has no consideration for justice, why should I have any consideration for her,—
i.e., show her any tenderness?’ Or: (2) ‘If she heeds not justice, why should I heed her?’ Neither view seems well suited to the context.
mvp-comment-358-1
καὶ ταῦτα
663
mvp-comment-358-2
τηλικοῦτος
664
mvp-comment-358-3
ἆρα
665
mvp-comment-358-4
χωρεῖν ἂν
666
εἰς πᾶν ἔργον
667
mvp-comment-359-1
εὖ νυν ἐπίστω
668
mvp-comment-359-2
ἔξωρα
669
mvp-comment-359-3
προσεικότα
670
mvp-comment-360-1
ἀλλὰ … γὰρ
671
mvp-comment-360-2
ἡ … ἐκ σοῦ δυσμένεια
672
mvp-comment-360-3
ἐξαναγκάζει
673
αἰσχροῖς
674
mvp-comment-360-4
622 f. The word
θρέμμα
675
mvp-comment-360-5
ἦ σ’ ἐγὼ
676
mvp-comment-361-1
νιν
677
mvp-comment-361-2
εὑρίσκεται
678
mvp-comment-361-3
Cp. Milton,
Apology for Smectymnuus (in his
Prose Works, ed. Symmons, vol. I. p. 236): ‘I might also tell them [the prelates], what Electra in Sophocles, a wise virgin, answered her wicked mother, who thought herself too violently reproved by her the daughter: ‘'
Tis you that say it,
not I; you do the deeds, |
And your ungodly deeds find me the words.’’
mvp-comment-362-1
οὐ μὰ
679
mvp-comment-362-2
δέσποιναν
680
mvp-comment-362-3
Ἄρτεμιν
681
mvp-comment-362-4
θράσους τοῦδ’ οὐκ ἀλύξεις
682
μόλῃ
683
mvp-comment-363-1
ὁρᾷς
684
mvp-comment-363-2
ἐκφέρει
685
mvp-comment-363-3
The
v. l.
παρεῖσα
686
mvp-comment-364-1
οὐδὲ
687
mvp-comment-364-2
ὑπ’ εὐφήμου βοῆς
688
mvp-comment-364-3
ἐπειδὴ σοί γ’
689
mvp-comment-364-4
πᾶν λέγειν
690
mvp-comment-365-1
κελεύω
691
mvp-comment-365-2
τοὐμὸν στόμ’
692
mvp-comment-365-3
634 f. An altar, and probably an image, of Apollo stand before the palace. The attendant of Clytaemnestra carries offerings of various fruits, which she is now commanded to
raise, as with a gesture of solemn oblation (
ἔπαιρε
693
mvp-comment-365-4
ἡ παροῦσά μοι
694
mvp-comment-365-5
θύματα … πάγκαρπα
695