mvp-comment-776-1
δυσκάθαρτος Ἅιδου λιμήν
1
λιμήν
2
mvp-comment-777-1
κακάγγελτα
3
mvp-comment-777-2
προπέμψας
4
mvp-comment-778-1
ἐπεξειργάσω
5
mvp-comment-779-1
ὦ παῖ
6
mvp-comment-779-2
αὖ
(instead of
ὦ παῖ τίνα
), has not much palaeographical probability. It gives, indeed, a closer correspondence with 1266. But the form of dochmiac which the MS. reading gives here is equally correct. (See Analysis. Met.) Seidler was certainly right in omitting
λόγον
(see cr. n.): and that remedy suffices.
mvp-comment-779-3
Construe:
τίνα νέον σφάγιον γυναικεῖον μόρον λέγεις ἀμφικεῖσθαί μοι ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ
7
mvp-comment-779-4
But another version is possible, if
μοι
is taken with
ἀμφικεῖσθαι
: ‘besetting me,’
ἐπ’ ὀλέθρῳ
, for (my) ruin.
Cp. 1285
τί μ’ ὀλέκεις
; For
ἐπί
, cp.
Thuc. 4.86
οὐκ ἐπὶ κακῷ, ἐπ’ ἐλευθερώσει δέ
. The difficulty is that
ἀμφικεῖσθαι
cannot well be said of
one sorrow (Eurydicè's death), and that, therefore, we have to evolve from the epithet
νέον
the notion of a
circle of woes of which this
μόρος
is one. Thus the image would be much more obscurely expressed than that in
Ai. 351
,
ἴδεσθέ μ’ οἷον ἄρτι κῦμα φοινίας ὑπὸ ζάλης | ἀμφίδρομον κυκλεῖται
, (‘behold what a surge hath but now burst around me and hemmed me in, under stress of a deadly storm,’) where Ajax is sitting in the midst of the carnage which he has wrought. It is altogether improbable that
ἀμφικεῖσθαι
alludes to Eurydicè's corpse having been brought (by the
ἐκκύκλημα
) into such a position that Creon stood between it and Haemon's. See 1298, where Creon speaks of her as being
ἔναντα
.