Notes on the current edition
Concerning the Face which Appears in the Orb Of the Moon
1.
Strictly, the potential and the contingent; but probably Plutarch meant his phrase here to imply only
the possible in all its senses and intended no technical distinction between
δυνατόν and
ἐνδεχόμενο. Certainly one cannot ascribe to him the distinction drawn in the
pseudo-Plutarchean
Fato, 570 E 571 E
; n.b. that in
Stoicorum Repugnantiis, 1055 d-f he attacks the Chrysippean doctrine of
δυνατόν. On
δυνατόν and
ἐνδεχόμενον as used by Aristotle
cf. Ross, Aristotle’s
Metaphysics, ii, p. 245 ad 1046 B 26, and Faust,
r Möglichkeitsgedanke, i, pp. 175 ff.; for the attitude of the Hellenistic philosophers, Faust,
Op. cit. i, pp. 209 ff.
2.
For the uninhabitability of the arctic and torrid zones
cf. besides
Iside, 367 D Strabo, ii. 3. 1 (c. 96) and Cleomedes, i. 2. 12 (p. 22. 11-14 [Ziegler]); and for the connection of this theory with the notion that the greatest part of the outer ocean is in the torrid zone
cf. Cleomedes, i. 6. 33 (p. 60. 21-24). This was
not the opinion of Posidonius (Cleomedes,
ibid, and i. 6. 31-32 [p. 58. 4-25]); it was the geography of Cleanthes, which Crates sought to impose upon Homer (
cf. Geminus, xvi. 21 ff. [p. 172. 11 ff., Manitius]; Kroll,
R. E. xi. 1637 s. v.
Krates; Susemihl,
Geschichte der griech. Litteratur in der Alexandrinerzeit, ii, pp. 5 ff.). Since the first line quoted by Plutarch is
Iliad, xiv. 246
of our text of Homer (with
ὠκεανοῦ instead of
ὠκεανός) but the second line does not occur, the latter was probably an interpolation made by Crates to support his
interpretation of Homer’s geography; for Crates textual alterations and for the controversy between him and Aristarchus
cf. Susemihl,
Op. cit. i, p. 457 and ii, p. 7, n. 33; Kroll,
loc. cit. 1640; ChristSchmid-Stählin⁶, ii. 1, p. 210; Mette,
Sphairopoiia. pp. 60 ff.
3.
cf. Theophrastus,
Ventis, ii, § 11, and Aristotle,
Meteorology, 364 A 5-13. For
ἡ ἀοίκητος without a noun =
the uninhabited world
cf.
Adv. Coloten, 1115 a.
4.
Lamprias retorts upon Theon an adaptation of his own quotation of
Timaeus, 40 B - C;
cf. 937 E
supra and note c there.
5.
cf. 928 C
supra.
6.
For moon = Artemis
cf. 922 A
supra and note b there; for the virgin goddess of childbirth
cf. besides the references there
Plato,
Theaetetus, 149 B
, and Cornutus, 34 (p. 73. 18 ff. [Lang]).
7.
This refers to 937 F
supra. For the use of
ἁπλῆ
simple in this context cf Cleomedes, i. 4. 19 (p. 34. 20 [Ziegler]) and Theon of Smyrna, p. 150. 21-23 (Hiller).
8.
An example of the former hypothesis is Aristotle’s theory that each planet is fixed in a sphere revolving within counteracting spheres that cancel the special motions of the superior planet (
cf.
Metaphysics, 1073 B 38-1074 A 14 and
Caelo, 289 B 30-290 A 7); an example of the latter is Plato’s theory of freely moving planets (
cf.
Timaeus, 40 C-D,
Laws, 822 A-C; Cornford,
Plato’s Cosmology, pp. 79-93). Theon of Smyrna (p. 175. 1-4 [Hiller]) observes that the difference between these two kinds of astronomical model is immaterial in
saving the phenomena. On the whole passage
cf. Eudemus in Theon of Smyrna, p. 200. 13 ff. (Hiller).
9.
Norlind (
Eranos, xxv [1927], pp. 275-277) argues from the terms used here and in 937 F
supra that Plutarch has in mind the theory of epicycles which Hipparchus proposed for the moon and which is described by Ptolemy,
Syntaxis, iv (i, pp. 265 ff. and especially pp. 301. 16-302, 11 [Heiberg]). The evidence of the terminology is not exact enough to make this thesis convincing (
cf.
Class. Phil. xlvi [1951], pp. 146-147).
10.
cf. 938 A
supra:
twelve summers every year.
11.
For the
pressure of the air and the
ὑπέκκαυμα
cf.
Aristotle,
Meteorology, 341 B 6-25,
and Alexander,
Meteor. p. 20. 11 ff. Praechter (
Hierokles der Stoiker, p. 109) refers to Seneca,
Nat. Quaest. iv b 10 in support of his thesis that the material in this chapter of the
Facie is from a Stoic source.
12.
Lamprias is addressing Theon primarily; but Menelaus also was from Egypt, though we know only Alexandria as his residence.
13.
Theophrastus (
Hist. Plant. viii. 6. 6) says that in Egypt, Babylon, and Bactria, where rain is absent or scarce, dews nourish the crops (
cf. also
Hist. Plant. iv. 3. 7). Plutarchs statement here that the water drunk by the land in Egypt is
γηγενές may have been inspired by Platos remark in
Timaeus, 22 E 2-4; for the theory that the flood of Nile was caused by water springing from the earth
cf. Oenopides, frag. 11 (i, p. 394. 39 ff. [Diels-Kranz];
cf.
Seneca,
Nat. Quaest. iv a 2. 26
) and the opinion mentioned without an author by
Seneca,
Nat. Quaest. vi. 8. 3
. Praechter (
Hierokles, p. 110) holds that Plutarch here reflects Posidonius’s theory as reconstructed by Oder (
Philologus, Suppl. vii [1898], pp. 299 ff. and 312 f.).
14.
For this meaning of
συμφέρεσθαί τινι
cf.
Quomodo Quis Sent. Prof. Virt. 79 A,
Cohibenda Ira, 461 A,
Sollertia Animalium, 960 E,
Timoleon, 15 (242 E), Wyttenbach’s
Animadversiones in Plutarchi Opera Moralia (Leipzig, 1820), i, p. 461; the phrase cannot mean
to be compared with, as it has been regularly translated here.
15.
That the same species of plant varies with the nature of the soil, the atmosphere, and the cultivation is frequently stated by Theophrastus (
cf. e.g.
Hist. Plant. vi. 6. 3-5-8);
cf. with
ἐὰν σφόδρα τιεσθῇ χειμῶσιν in this passage Theophrastus,
Causis Plant. ii. 1. 2-4.
16.
On these plants that grew in the sea
cf. Theophrastus,
Hist. Plant. iv. 7. 1 ff.; Eratosthenes in Strabo, xvi. 3. 6 (c. 766);
Pliny,
Nat. Hist. xiii. 25. 50-52 (140-142)
. In
Quaest. Nat. 911 F Plutarch refers to the plants that are said to grow in the
Red Sea, but there he states that they are nurtured by the rivers which bring down mud and that these plants consequently grow only near to the shore.
17.
Cf Pliny,
Nat. Hist. xxiv. 17. 102 (167).
18.
cf. Theophrastus,
Hist. Plant. viii. 1. 1 and 4; 2. 6; and 3. 2.
19.
cf. Theophrastus,
Causis Plant. iii. 1. 3-6.
20.
For the notion that dew injures some plants
cf. possibly Theophrastus,
Causis Plant. vi. 18. 10; but he holds that desert vegetation is nourished by dew in default of rain (
Hist. Plant. iv. 3. 7 and viii. 6. 6).
21.
Of.
Vita et Poesi Homeri, B, 202 (vii, p. 450. 14-20 [Bernardakis]);
Aristotle,
Hist. Animal. 582 A 34 b 3
.
22.
On the liquefying action of the moon and the passage in general
cf.
Quaest. Conviv iii. 10 (657 F ff.);
Iside, 367 D;
Cicero,
Nat. Deorum, ii. 19. 50
(with Mayor’s note
ad. loc.);
Pliny,
Nat. Hist. ii. 101 (223)
. On the growth of plants
cf. also
Iside, 353 F and Athenaeus, iii. 74 C; on softening of timbers Theophrastus,
Hist. Plant. v. 1. 3; on easy delivery
S. V. F. ii, frag. 748. For further literature
cf. Boll,
Sternglaube und Sterndeutung³ (1926), pp. 122-125.
23.
=
S. V. F. ii, frag. 679.
cf. also
Cicero,
Divinatione, ii. 34
(with Pease’s note
ad loc.) and
Nat. Deorum, ii. 7. 19; Seneca,
Provid. i. 4; Cleomedes, ii. 1. 86 (p. 156. 15-16 [Ziegler]) and ii. 3. 98 (p. 178. 4-5); Strabo, iii. 5. 8 (cc. 173 f.) and i. 3. 11 (cc. 54-55). In
Placitis, 897 B-C ( = Aëtius, iii. 17. 3 and 9) theories that the moon influences the tides are attributed to Pytheas and to Seleucus.
24.
Alcman, frag. 43 (Diehl) = 48 (Bergk⁴). In both
Quaest. Conviv 659 B and
Quaest. Nat. 918 A Plutarch quotes the line as an explanation of the origin of dew,
cf. Macrobius,
Sat. vii. 16. 31-32.
25.
cf.
Vergil,
Georgics, iii. 337
; Roscher,
Selene und Verwandtes, p. 50, n. 200.
26.
cf.
Aristotle,
Hist. Animal. 588 B 4 ff
. and
Part. Animal. 681 A 12-15.
27.
See 938 C
supra and note d there. On the text and implication of this sentence
cf.
Class. Phil. xlvi (1951), pp. 147-148.
28.
For
ἡ ἄλιμος
cf.
Sept. Sap. 157 D-F; [Plutarch],
Comment. in Hesiod. § 3 (vii, p. 51. 14 ff. [Bernardakis]);
Pliny,
Nat. Hist. xxii. 22 (73)
; Porphyry,
Vita Pythag. § 34 and
Abstinentia, iv. 20 (p. 266. 5 ff. [Nauck]); Plato,
Laws, 677 E (where the word
ἄλιμος itself does not occur, however).
29.
Works and Days, 41
.
30.
cf. Epimenides, frag. A 5 (i, pp. 30-31 [Diels-Kranz]), where reference to this passage should be added.
31.
cf.
Aristotle,
Gen. Animal. 761 B 21-23
for the suggestion that animate beings of a kind unknown to us may exist on the moon and [Philoponus],
Gen. Animal. p. 160. 16-20 for a description of these creatures that do not eat or drink.
32.
=
S. V. F. ii, frag. 677.
cf.
Stoicorum Repugnantiis, 1053 A ( =
S. V. F. ii, frag. 579); Aëtius, ii. 17. 4; Strabo, i. 1. 9 (c. 6); Cleomedes, i. 6. 33 (p. 60. 21-24 [Ziegler]). Plutarch, of course, uses Stoic doctrine here against the Stoics.
33.
Zeno called earth
ἰλύ and
ὑποστάθμη (
S. V. F. i, frags. 104 and 105); but, since the end of this chapter appears to have been inspired by Plato’s
Phaedo, 109 B-D, the phrase here used was probably suggested to Plutarch by Plato’s use of
ὑποστάθμη there (109 C 2).
34.
Iliad, xx. 65
.
35.
Iliad, viii. 16.