Notes on the current edition
Concerning the Face which Appears in the Orb Of the Moon
1.
See 921 f, 929 B, 929 F
supra.
2.
In
Placitis, 892 A = Aëtius, ii. 30. 1 this notion is ascribed to the Pythagoreans (and in the version of Stobaeus specifically to Philolaüs). Diogenes Laertius, ii. 8 ascribes it to Anaxagoras — if on the basis of frag. B 4 (ii, p. 34. 5 ff. [Diels-Kranz]), wrongly; and Cicero’s ascription of it to Xenophanes (
Acad. Prior. II, xxxix. 123) is certainly an error (despite Lactantius,
Div. Inst. iii. 23. 12) but more probably due to confusion with Xenocrates than, as is usually said, a mistake for Anaxagoras (
cf. J. S. Reid ad loc.; Diels-Kranz,
Frag. der Vorsok.⁵ , i, p. 125. 40; Diels,
Dox. Graeci, p. 121, n. 1). The
moon-dwellers became characters of
scientific fiction at least as early as Herodorus of Heraclea (
cf. Athenaeus, ii. 57 f).
3.
Timaeus, 40 B-C. Though
ἀτρεκῆ does not appear there, it is introduced into the passage by Plutarch at 938 E
s.v. and at
Plat. Quaest. 1006 E, which indicates that he meant it as part of the quotation. Since there appears to be no other reference to the words
τροφὸν ἡμετέραν in Plutarch’s extant works, one cannot be sure that
τροφήν here is not his own misquotation rather than a scribal error. (The phrase,
τροφαῖς ζῴων, in
Superstitione, 171 A is probably not part of the adaptation of the
Timaeus-passage there.)
4.
cf. the sarcastic remarks of Lucius in 923 C
supra. For the
stone of Tantalus
cf.
Nostoi, frag. x ( =
Athenaeus, 281 B - C
);
Pindar,
Olympian, i. 57-58
and
Isthmian, viii. 10-11
: and
Scholia in Olymp. i. 91 a, where reference is made to the
interpretation that the stone which threatens Tantalus is the sun, this being his punishment for having declared that the sun is an incandescent mass (
cf. also scholiast on
Euripides,
Orestes, 982-986
).
5.
For the myth of Ixion on his wheel
cf.
Pindar,
Pythian, ii. 21-48
and for Ixion used in a cosmological argument
cf.
Aristotle,
Caelo, 284 A 34-35.
6.
An epithet of Hecate (
cf. Athenaeus, vii. 325 A) applied to the moon only after she had been identified with the moongoddess, after which her epithets had to be explained by reference to lunar phenomena.
cf. e.g. Cleomedes, ii. 5. 111 (p. 202. 5-10 [Ziegler]) on
τριπρόσωπος, and Cornutus,
Theologiae Graecae Compend. 34 (p. 72. 7-15 [Lang]) on
τρίμορφος and
τριοδῖτις. The etymology here put into Theons mouth had already been given by Varro in his
Lingua Latina, vii. 16. For the moon as Hecate
cf. notes b on 942 D and g on 944 C
s.v..
7.
For the text, terminology, and intention of these two sentences
cf.
Class. Phil. xlvi (1951), pp. 146-147.
8.
cf. Epimenides, frag. B 2 (i, p. 32. 22 ff. [Diels-Kranz]); Anaxagoras, frag. A 77 (ii, p. 24. 25-26 and 28-30 [DielsKranz]). It may be that Anaxagoras referred to this legend in connection with his theory concerning the meteoric stone of Aegospotami, the fall of which he is said to have
predicted (
Lysander, 12 [439 D-F];
Diogenes Laertius, ii. 10
;
Pliny,
Nat. Hist. ii. 58 [59], 149-150
). Kepler (note 77) suggests that the story of the lion falling from the sky may have arisen from a confusion of
λάων (gen. pl. of
λᾶας) and
λέων or, as Prickard puts it, between
λᾶς and
λίς. Diogenes Laertius (viii. 72) quotes Timaeus to the effect that Heraclides Ponticus spoke of the fall of a man from the moon, an incident which Voss after Hirzel refers to a dialogue of his that may have influenced Plutarch (Voss,
Heraclidis Pontici Vita et Scriptis, p. 61).
9.
Aeschylus,
Supplices, 937
; cf
De Curiositate, 517 f
, where also Plutarch gives
βίων instead of Aeschylus’s
βίου.
10.
i.e. Ethiopians:
cf. Herodotus, iv. 183. 4; Strabo, ii. 5. 36 (c. 133).
11.
cf.
Aristotle,
Meteorology, 340 B 36 341 A 4, 347 A 2935
, and
Alexander,
Meteor. p. 16. 6-15
, where lines 10-11 guarantee and explain the
ἐναντίους in Plutarch’s text.
12.
Cf 939 E
s.v. and
Plat. Quaest. 1005 E.
13.
cf.
Iliad, xix. 340-356.
14.
See 922 A
supra and note C there.
15.
= Pherecydes, frag. B 13 a (i, p. 51. 5-9 [Diels-Kranz]).
16.
Megasthenes, frag. 34 (
Frag. Hist. Graec. ii, pp. 425-427 [Müller]);
cf.
Strabo, ii. 1. 9 (c. 70)
and xv. 1. 57 (c. 711);
Pliny,
Nat. Hist. vii. 2. 25
.
Aristotle (
Parva Nat. 445 A 16-17)
mentions the belief of certain Pythagoreans that some animals are nourished by odours;
cf. the story told of Democritus, frags. A 28 and 29 (ii, p. 89. 23 ff. [Diels-Kranz]), and Lucian on the Selenites (
Vera Hist. i. 23), a passage which, however, looks like a parody of Herodotus, i. 202. 2.