κατὰ τὸν χρόνον τοῦτον ὅν
—i.e.
καθ’ ὄν, according to a common idiom; cf.
Soph.
OC. 748
ἐς τοσοῦτον αίκίας πεσεῖν |
ἔδοξ’,
ὅσον πέπτωκεν ἥδε .
ἐν τοῖς πλεῖσται δή
—for the fem. cf. c.
82,
1 (
στάσις)
ἐν τοῖς πρώτη ἐγένετο. Pre-eminence is not necessarily implied in any of the examples of this idiom, and Herbst is perhaps right in saying that prominence only is meant. The latter must be the point here, because of
παραπλήσιαι δὲ καὶ ἔτι πλείους.
δή
heightening the superlative is not elsewhere added to this idiom.
αὐτοῖς
—with
ἐγένοντο.
ἐνεργοὶ †κάλλει
makes no sense.
ἐνεργός, though not elsewhere applied to ships, is well suited to them, ‘on active service,’ ‘in commission’; and it may be that the note in Hesychius
αἱ μὴ ἀργαί alludes to this passage. But
κάλλει must be corrupt, for the rendering ‘effective by their fine condition’ is not possible. Herbst's conjecture
ς/ καὶ λ/, i.e. 230, is plausible; but in order to make up so great a total, he assumes a fleet of sixty ships for guarding the eoast of Attica. Were this so, we should surely have heard of it at c.
16,
2 among the reasons that caused the Pel. to abandon the invasion; and even though we are left to collect the number of ships at sea in 428 B.C., this large item in the total must have been mentioned
somewhere. Still, the interpolator may have reckoned the total at 230 by the same proeess, whatever it was, that led him to 250 for 431 B.C. below. The number, however, does not come in naturally after
ἐν τοῖς πλεῖσται. A very good sense would be got by
μιᾷ πόλει (Widmann).
τήν τε γὰρ Ἀττικήν
—referring to the first year of the war; but there is no mention of such a fleet in the account of that year.
περὶ Πελοπόννησον
—this fleet had been sent out by Pericles as a counter-stroke to the invasion of Attica.
χωρὶς δέ
—‘besides,’ sc.
ἦσαν, which is implied in the context.
τοῦτο
—i.e. the sending out of these armaments. In a somewhat similarly vague way
μετὰ Ποτειδαίας
is used for
μετὰ τῆς Ποτειδαίας πολιορκίας, with which should be compared
II.
13
ἐς Ποτείδαιαν ἀπανηλώθη, ‘money was spent on the siege of P.’ It is strange that the expenses of the
army at Potidaea, as distinct from the expenses of the
fleet there, should be brought in so vaguely.
δίδραχμοι
—half a drachma a day was the ordinary pay for a hoplite: here it is one drachma for the hoplite and one for his servant.
ἐλάμβανε
—we should expect
ἕκαστος ἐλάμβανον or
ἐλάμβανεν. It is the omission of a singular subject to which the verb is attracted that is remarkable: edd. note that this omission is frequent in Herod.
ὧν οὐκ ἐλάσσους
—when Potidaea revolted in 432 B.C., 3000 Athenian hoplites had been sent to besiege it. It seems that the permanent force was maintained at this number throughout the siege.
οἳ προαπῆλθον
—these 1600 had been sent to blockade Potidaea from the south (
I.
64
) soon after the revolt. They were withdrawn from Chalcidice before the place fell.
τὸν αὐτὸν μισθόν
—viz. one drachma per man, or double the ordinary wage (
VI.
31
).
τοσαῦται δή
—referring still to the
παραπλησίαι καὶ ἔτι πλείους (§ 1); so that the digression extends to the end of the chapter.