ἐν πολλῇ ἔριδι ἦσαν, ὡς
—cf.
II. 54
ἐγένετο ἔρις τοῖς ἀνθρώποις μὴ λοιμὸν ὠνομάσθαι.
οὐδ’ ἀληθῆ ἐστιν ἃ λέγοιτο
—for the dependent verb in opt. in
O.O. when the leading verb retains the indic.,
M T. § 690. See crit. note, and Intr. p. xxiii.
οἱ δέ
—the sentenee proceeds as if
ἔλεγον in place of
έν ἕριδι ἦσαν were the verb. On the MSS. reading
τοῖς δέ Stahl notes that whereas there are examples of a passing from an
oblique case into the
nom. (
e.g. c 24, 3 n.; and not unfrequent in tragedy), there are no other examples of a passing from the
nom. into an
oblique ease. The difference ean be appreciated by comparing Eur.
Phoen. 1474 (Poppo)
ἦν δ’ ἔρις στρατηλάταις, |
οἱ μὲν πατάξαι πρόσθε Πολυνείκην δορί, |
οἱ δ’ ὡς θανόντων οὐδαμοῦ νίκη πέλοι.
εἰ καὶ ἕλθοιεν
—the brevity of the form finely expresses the keenness of the
ἔρις .
αὐτούς
—more regularly
σφᾶς.
ἐς γέλωτα ἔτρεπον
—Aristoph.
Wasps 1253
εἰς γέλων τὸ πρᾶγμ) ἔτρεψας.
τὸ πιστεῦον
—the neut. is often so used by Thuc colleetively for the masc. plur.; cf. c. 69, 3
τὸ ὑπηκοον τῶν ξυμμάχων, and with adverb without partic.
τὸ μὴ ἐκποδὼν τετίμηται
II. 45
;
πᾶν τὸ ἐξ ἐναντίας, καὶ εἰ φίλιον εἴη τῶν φευγόντων
VII. 44
.
Ἀθηναγόρας
—nothing more is heard of him, but, from the mention of his name and the description given of him, he must have been famous. He would, however, as leader of the popular party and opposed to Hermocrates, be promment only in time of peace.
δήμου προστάτης
—cf. c. 28, 2
δήμου προεστάναι. The phrase is often applied to unofficial leaders of a popular party, and in
Ath. Pol. is interchanged with
δημαγωγός, and is contrasted with
τῶν γνωρίμων, εὐπόρων, ἐπιφανῶν, προστάτης. He was ‘the man whom the multitude expected to come forward as their champion—
ἐν τῷ παρόντι, as long as they eontinued to trust him’ (Freeman). Of course he
might be a
στρατηγός, as Pericles, but was not necessarily in any official position. The speech that follows is very remarkable; like the Funeral Oration (
II. 35
), it does not apply only to the matter immediately under consideration, but has a wider range as illustrating the politics of Syracuse, and indeed of all democracies. It shows how ‘it is much easier to draw up a democratic constitution than to work it, when drawn up, in a democratic spirit’ (Freeman).