1.
I have not followed Arnold's reading in this passage, though Bekker and Göller adopt it; because it seems improbable that
ἦ μέν, the reading of nearly all the MSS., should have been a mistake of the copyists for one
so much easier, and so different from it, as
ἡμεῖς. At the same time I am far from certain whether
ᾗ μέν that which I have preferred, on the authority of Herman, Poppo, and Bloomfield, be really the true one; for in no other passage in Thucydides, I believe, has
ᾗ the force which is here given to it; and though Bloomfield quotes one instance of its being so used by Xenophon, he is there writing, not as an historian, but as a philosopher; and so uses it, as it is very commonly used by philosophical writers in later times. Should this objection be thought to have any weight, I would venture to propose
ἡμῖν which comes nearer to the various readings of the MSS. than
ἡμεῖς; and gives a sense in exact accordance with what follows: for
καὶ πρὸς ὑμῶν, at the beginning of the next paragraph, would stand in strong opposition to it:
For
us, then, we certainly think it advantageous——and it is no less for
your interest also.
It may perhaps be regarded as some corroboration of this conjecture, that the scholiast quoted by Arnold uses
ἡμῖν in his paraphrase;
νομίζομεν ἡμῖν προσήκειν μὴ καταλύειν τὸ κοινὸν ἀγαθόν.