Current edition
Perseus
History of Rome
(English)
(Foster, Benjamin Oliver; Moore, Frank Gardener; Sage, Evan T.; Schlesinger, Alfred C.,
translators.
Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann, Ltd., 1919-1959.
(Loeb Classical Library))
Notes on the current edition
Ab Urbe Condita With An English Translation, books 1-10, 21-45, with periochae 11-20
1.
Probably on furlough, subject to further call; the consul would not have formally discharged the army without action by the senate.
2.
Gentius had been suspected of piracy in
180 B.C. (XL. xlii. 2-5, XLII. xxix. 11). Efforts to attach him to the Roman cause had been misconducted and were valueless (XLII. xxxvii. 2, and xlv. 8). On Perseus' overtures to Gentius, see below, xix. 13-xx. 3, and xxiii. 8.
3.
Very likely the naval
duumvir mentioned in XLI. i. 2-3, who had been in charge of the north-eastern coast of Italy in
178 B.C.
4.
B.C. 171
5.
The number of soldiers to be transported on the ships, which had their own crews, seems too large (cf. XXXVII. ii. 10-a force of three thousand transported in twenty ships (cf. XXII. xxii. 1), XXI. 1. 5-1700 soldiers and sailors in 7 ships) and the number of ships should perhaps be larger (eighteen?).
6.
The city praetor, cf. below, xi. 4; he was evidently absent from Rome on coast-defence duty, hence the appearance of Maenius (above, iv. 11, and viii. 4) as presiding officer of the senate.
7.
Garrisons had been placed in their territory the preceding year, XLII. xxxvi. 9.