Current edition
Perseus
History of Rome
(English)
(Foster, Benjamin Oliver; Moore, Frank Gardener; Sage, Evan T.; Schlesinger, Alfred C.,
translators.
Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann, Ltd., 1919-1959.
(Loeb Classical Library))
Notes on the current edition
Ab Urbe Condita With An English Translation, books 1-10, 21-45, with periochae 11-20
1.
lvii. 12-14), and it was probably customary for generals to hold out parts of it. Scipio seems to have been careless enough or honest enough not to reserve any booty for this purpose. This episode, together with the following, reveals, however, friction between the senate and the Scipios.
2.
Cf. XXIX. xiv. 1. There are numerous references to the selection of Scipio Nasica as the
vir optimus to receive the goddess (
e.g. XXXV. x. 9). The choice of Brutus rather than Nasica as the dedicator of the temple may be an additional rebuke to him. See, however, the
Periocha.
3.
The chronology is incorrect. Africanus and Licinius were consuls in
205 B.C. (XXVIII. xxxviii. 12) and Cethegus and Tuditanus in
204 B.C. (XXIX. xi. 10), when the divinity was brought to Rome. Livius and Claudius were censors in this year (XXIX. xxxvii. 1). See also sect. 6 below.
4.
B.C. 191
5.
It is futile to try to determine just what Antias meant. Cf. XXXIV. liv. 3 for a similar statement.
6.
The temple was vowed at the battle of the Metaurus in
207 B.C., but Livy has not mentioned before either the vow or the contract.
7.
These events then belong to the early spring of
191 B.C.
8.
This was in accordance with Greek ritual.
9.
B.C. 191
10.
This interpretation is somewhat unnatural but is necessary to secure consistency with i. 9 above.