M. Tullius Cicero, Divinatio in Q. Caecilium, 24

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

← Previous Next →

[24] He says also, in order that some alarm may be mingled with the exertion of his influence, that there are certain men on the bench to whom he wishes their tablets to be shown, and that that is very easy, for that they do not give their votes separately, but that all vote together; and that a tablet, ¹ covered with the proper wax, and not with that illegal wax which has given so much scandal, is given to every one. And he does not give himself all this trouble so much for the sake of Verres, as because he disapproves of the whole affair. For he sees that, if the power of prosecuting is taken away from the high-born boys whom he has hitherto played with, and from the public informers, whom he has always despised and thought insignificant (not without good reason), and to be transferred to fearless men of well-proved constancy, he will no longer be able to domineer over the courts of law as he pleases.

Divinatio in Q. Caecilium. M. Tullius Cicero. London. 1903.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by National Endowment For The Humanities (NEH).

Current edition Perseus

Divinatio against Q. Caecilius (English) (Cicero. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Volume 1. Yonge, Charles Duke, translator. London: Bell, 1903.)

Editions (1)

Divinatio in Q. Caecilium Perseus (Cicero. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, Volume 3. Peterson, William, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1917.) — 24 focus

[24] et ait idem, ut aliquis metus adiunctus sit ad gratiam, certos esse in consilio quibus ostendi tabellas velit; id esse perfacile; non enim singulos ferre sententias¹, sed universos constituere; ceratam uni cuique tabellam dari cera legitima, non illa infami ac nefaria. atque is non tam propter Verrem laborat quam quod eum minime res tota delectat; videt enim, si a pueris nobilibus, quos adhuc elusit, si a quadruplatoribus, quos non sine causa contempsit semper ac pro nihilo putavit, accusandi voluntas ad viros fortis spectatosque homines translata sit, sese in iudiciis diutius dominari non posse.

Notes on the current edition

Against Quintus Caecilius

1. “The judges were provided with three tabellae, one of which was marked with A, i.e. absolvo, I acquit; the second with C, i.e. condemno, condemn; and the third with N L, i.e. non liquet. It is not clear to me, why Cicero ( pro Mil. 6 ) calls the first litera salutaris, and the second litera tristis. It would seem that in some trials the tabellae were marked with the lettera L, libero, and D, damno, respectively.” Smith's Dict. Ant. v. Tabella. In trials like this between Cicero and Caecilius it is probable that the two tabellae had the names of the different candidates inscribed on them. The circumstance alluded to in the text was that a short time before this Terentius Varro had been accused of extortion and defended by Hortensius, who bribed the judges, and then in order to be sure that they voted as they had promised, caused tablets to be given to them smeared with coloured wax, so that he could easily recognize their votes in the balloting urn.

M. Tullius Cicero Divinatio in Q. Caecilium 24

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

Current edition Perseus

Notes on the current edition

Stable identifiers