M. Tullius Cicero Pro Q. Roscio Comoedo 41

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

← Previous Next →

[41] If you say it was on some other account, what dealings had you ever had with him? None. Had you obtained any verdict against him? No. I am wasting time to no purpose. He never, he says, got a hundred thousand sesterces from Flavius at all, neither on account of Panurgus, nor of any one else. If I prove that, after this recent agreement with Roscius, you did get a hundred thousand sesterces from Flavius, what have you to allege why you should not leave the court defeated with disgrace? By what witness then shall I make this plain?

Pro Q. Roscio Comoedo. M. Tullius Cicero. London. 1903.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by National Endowment For The Humanities (NEH).

Current edition Perseus

For Quintus Roscius the Actor (English) (Cicero. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Volume 1. Yonge, Charles Duke, translator. London: Bell, 1903.)

Editions (1)

Pro Q. Roscio Comoedo Perseus (Cicero. M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes, Volume 4. Clark, Albert Curtis, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.) — 41 focus

[41] si alia de causa, quae ratio tibi cum eo intercesserat? nulla. addictus erat tibi? non. frustra tempus contero. omnino, inquit, HS ccciↄↄↄ a Flavio non abstulit neque Panurgi nomine neque cuiusquam. si planum facio post hanc recentem stipulationem Rosci HS ccciↄↄↄ a Flavio te abstulisse, numquid causae est quin ab iudicio abeas turpissime victus? quo teste igitur hoc planum faciam?

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

Current edition Perseus

Stable identifiers