7.
ῥᾳδίως ἂν μάχῃ ... Τροίαν εἷλον
— does this passage refer to ‘the two natural stages of the expedition’— battle followed by siege, or two
alternative means of taking Troy,—either by pitched battle outside the gates, or by siege? Those who adopt the first, either (a) bracket the first
εἷλον with Kruger as spurious, and explain the
δ’ after
πολιορκίᾳ as (a violent) apodotic
δέ, or, with Kruger bracket it; or else (b) make the first
εἷλον mean,
not ‘capture (Troy),’ but, with Herbst, ‘defeat (the Trojans).’ Those who adopt the second with Bauer, make
μάχῃ κρατοῦντες = ‘by superiority in the field,’ and not ‘being as they were superior in the field’; and
πολιορκίᾳ προσκαθεζόμενοι = ‘by a regular siege,’ instead of ‘by persisting in a siege.’ But the difficulties involved in this are insuperable; for—apart from the extraordinary way in which the supposed alternative methods are expressed, and joined by
δέ instead of
ἤ—the sense obtained, though at first sight attractive, makes
περιουσίαν ἔχοντες τροφῆς and
ξυνεχῶς τὸν πόλεμον διέφερον pointless in so far as the
first method— superiority in the field + assault—is concerned; it necessitates forcing the meaning
by an immediate assault (
κατὰ κράτος) into
μάχῃ κρατοῦντες, and thus making this wholly distinct from
μάχῃ ἐκράτησαν in
11.1
; and it strains no less the meaning of
πολιορκίᾳ προσκαθεζόμενοι. We therefore prefer the first plan, but slightly modified; if the first
εἷλον is genuine, it is probably a mere anticipation of the second. Trans.
If they had ... carried on the war persistently, they would easily have continued superior in the field and have taken the city, seeing that ... : if, then, they had persisted in a siege, they would have taken Troy.