Notes on the current edition
The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos
1.
Agênor and his school, the
Ἀγηνόρειοι, are mentioned among the earlier musicians before Aristoxenos: Blass,
Att. Ber. II. 304.
2.
Schäfer,
Dem. u. seine Zeit, I. 427, 434.
3.
Dem.
Or. XV.,
υπὲρ τῆς Ῥοδίων ἐλευθερίας, (date 351 B.C.) § 16.
4.
Diod. XVI. 48. Cf. Schäf. I. 437.
5.
Date.
6.
350 B.C. is the date taken by Blass (
Att. Ber. II. 303). But another is possible, against which I have felt great difficulty in deciding—347 B.C. We know that the oligarchy at Mytilene was followed (whether immediately or not) by the tyranny of one Kammes; but that, in 347—6 B.C., the democracy was restored with Athenian help. (Dem.
Or. XL.
πρὸς Βοιωτὸν περὶ προικός, §§ 36 f.: Schäf. vol. III., Appendix, p. 224). Now:— 1. Isokrates certainly compares the moderation of the prevalent party at Mytilene to that of the Athenian
democracy in 403 B.C., § 3: 2. Diophantos
may not have come back from Egypt till 346 B C.: for, while Diodoros and Clinton (
F. H. II. App. 18) put the end of the war in 350, Thirlwall (c. 48, VI. 187
n.) argues from Isokr. (
Philipp. § 101) that the Persian reconquest of Egypt cannot have been achieved before the latter part of 346. My reasons for, on the whole, preferring 350 are these:—1. We do not know that, in 347, a party overthrew a party. When Kammes fell, the democracy may have been restored unanimously. 2. The letter is inscribed (as Blass has observed)
τοῖς Μ. ἄρχουσι, not M.
τῷ δήμῳ καὶ τῇ βουλῇ. 3. In § 7 Isokrates takes credit for having always vindicated the
ἐλευθερία and
αὐτονομία of the Greeks,—in other words, as the context shows, the independence of the allies from Athens (ef.his Speech
On the Peace). This would point to 350 rather than to 347, when, on the restoration of the democracy, Mytilene came again into the Athenian league.
7.
Analysis.