Sir Richard C. Jebb The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos 1.introduction.26

View: By Chapter

The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos. Sir Richard C. Jebb. London. 1876.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by National Endowment for the Humanities.

Current edition Perseus

The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos (English) (The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos. Jebb, Richard Claverhouse, author. London: Macmillan, 1876.)

Notes on the current edition

The Attic Orators from Antiphon to Isaeos

1. Was his oratory artistic in form?
2. Suidas s. v. Περικλῆς ;
ῥήτωρ καὶ δημαγωγός, ὅστις πρῶτος γραπτὸν λόγον ἐν δικαστηρίῳ εἶπε, τῶν πρὸ αὐτοῦ σχεδιαζόντων
.
3. Cic. De Orat. II. § 93,
antiquissimi fere sunt, quorum quidem scripta constent:
where the ‘constent’ seems to imply that the question of authentieity had been examined. But in Brut. § 27 he says, more doubtfully,
Ante Periclem, cuius scripta quaedam feruntur, littera nulla est quae quidem ornatum aliquem habeat
.
4. Quint. III 1 § 12,
Equidem non reperio quicquam tanta eloquentiae fama dignum; ideoque minus miror esse qui nihil ab eo scriptum putent, haec autem quae feruntur ab aliis esse composita.
5. Statement of Plutarch.
6. Plut. Pericl. c. 8,
ἔγγραφον μὲν οὐδὲν ἀπολέλοιπε πλὴν τῶν ψηφισμάτων· ἀπομνημονεύεται δὲ ὀλίγα παντάπασιν
.
7. Below, pp. 27 f.
8. Thucydidean Speeches of Perikles.
9. Notices of his oratory.
10.
Α. κράτιστος οὗτος ἐγένετ’ ἀνθρώπων λέγειν
ὁπὀτε παρέλθοι, χὥσπερ ἁγαθοὶ δρομῆς
ἐκ δέκα ποδῶν ᾕρει λέγων τοὺς ῥήτορας.
Β. ταχὺν λέγεις μέν· πρὸς δέ γ’ αὐτοῦ τῷ τάχει
πειθώ τις ἐπεκάθιζεν ἐπὶ τοῖς χείλεσιν·
οὕτως ἐκήλει· καὶ μόνος τῶν ῥητόρων
τὸ κέντρον ἐγκατέλειπε τοῖς ἀκροωμένοις
Eupolis, Δῆμοι, Bothe Frag. Com. I. 162, where the ancient citations of this famous passage are brought together. See (e.g.) Quint. XII. 10 , Cic. Brut. § 38 .
11. Its distinctive conditions.
12. Cf. Mr Watkiss Lloyd's ‘Age of Perikles’ I. 159 (speaking of the sweetness of voice and facile swiftness which distinguished the elocution of Perikles):—‘The combination of power, rapidity, and faseination that is thus avouched, is probably not so much explamed by, as it explains, the tradition of his obligations to such varied instructors as Anaxagoras, Damon, and Aspasia ..To Plato, Perikles was still, though only by traditional reputation, the most accomplished of all orators’ ( Phaedr. p 269 E,
πάντων τελεώτατος εἰς τὴν ῥητορικήν
.)—As Mr Lloyd says, Plato seems inclined there to connect this excellence of Perikles with a study of psychology under Anaxagoras: though the Phaedo p. 97 B implies that Anaxagoras did not enter on such inquiries. Undoubtedly psychology is what Plato in the Phaedros is recommending, first of all, to Isokrates; see on this, Blass, Isokrates und Isaios, p. 29.