As a matter of verbal criticism, it might be observed that
αἰέν
and
ἔστ’
confirm each other. But the defence of the text rests on broader ground. Evidently we must either reject the whole passage 1028 —1039, as Morstadt and Nauck do, or else leave this verse unaltered. For the parallel between the sword and the girdle, as fatal to their respective recipients, would fail altogether, if the girdle had not been an agent of
death to Hector, but merely of insult to his corpse. It is not known whence Sophocles derived this version, which so strangely mars the very climax of the
Iliad; possibly from one of the two Cyclic epics, the
Aethiopis of Arctînus or the
Little Iliad of Lesches, which related the
ὅπλων κρίσις
(see Introd. §§ 2, 3). One thing, at least, seems hardly doubtful. The original motive of this version must have been the same which prompts its use by Sophocles here, —viz., to point the fatal character of Hector's gift to Ajax by connecting a like result with the gift of Ajax to Hector. Two epigrams, attributed to Leontius Scholasticus (
circ. 550 A.D. ), turn on the same legend (
Anthol. 7. 151, 152): see Appendix.