Gregorius Nazianzenus De Theologia (Orat. 28) 7

ed. Arthur James Mason

De Theologia (Orat. 28). Gregorius Nazianzenus. ed. Arthur James Mason. Germany. 2014.

Sponsored by University of Leipzig.

Funding provided by European Social Fund Saxony.

Current edition First1KGreek

De Theologia (Orat. 28) (Greek) (Gregory of Nazianzus. The Five Theological Orations. Mason, Arthur James, translator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899.)

Notes on the current edition

De Theologia (Orat. 28)

1. 4 ορεκτον] -των e 7. 6 ὀλαῖς] ὅλως abde ‘Coisl. 3 Or. ’ ǁ 7 εφοδιες] ’Coisl. 1 ορμαις’ (perperam) || 11 σωματα]+ ω f || 12 αυτη] αὐτή ut vid cef ΙΙ ταύτα δε] + ω f ΙΙ 15 om η cdef
2. 1 τῷ τ. π. ἐρευνῶντι κτλ.] 1 Cor. ii 10.,
3. 3. τοῦ πρόσω] ‘no longer needs to advance.’
4. ib. τὸ ἔσχ. ὀρεκτόν] ‘ the ultimate object of ’ The phrase comes originally from Arist. Metaph. xii 7.
5. 4. πολιτεία τ. ὑψηλοῦ] ‘all a high-minded man's life.’
6. 7. to begin with, God cannot be corporeal; which would involve being dissoluble.
7. 6. ὅλαις τ. λου....ἐφόδοις] The reading ὅλως (‘if you rely at all’) would not make so strong an argu- ment against Eunomian self-confidence. Ἔφοδος ‘method.’
8. 8. βασανιζόμενος] a logical pa- rallel to ὅλαις;š—‘however much you rack it.’
9. 9. καυχ. εἰς τὰ ἄμετρα] ‘boasting of your command of the infinite.’
10. ib. σῶμα] of course, a very un- likely alternative for the Eunomians to choose; and it must be admitted that Gr. somewhat begs the question as against them, in the next clause.
11. ib. καἰ πῶς] sc. σῶμά ἐστιν (or ἄν εἴη).
12. 11. ἢ καἰ ταῦτα σ.] ‘Are bodies to be so described?’
13. ib. τ. ἐξουσίας] ‘a stretch of power,’ to confer such properties upon a body!
14. 12. σῶμα μέν, οὐχὶ τ. δέ] ‘Will you make Him a body and drop these attributes?’ This Gr. terizes as ‘gross.’ For παχύτητος cp. § 4 τὸ παχὺ τοῦτο σαρκίον.
15. 13. ἵνα...ἔχῃ] B good example that not ‘final’ use of ἴνα which is familiar in the N.T.
16. 14. σεπτόν] from σέβεσθαι, ‘an object of devotion.’ Gr. mean that the fact of being περιγραπτόν would by itself preclude being σεπτόν, but that all that is connoted by περιγράπτῳ would.