Notes on the current edition
De Theologia (Orat. 28)
1.
4 ορεκτον] -των e 7. 6 ὀλαῖς] ὅλως abde ‘Coisl. 3 Or. ’ ǁ 7 εφοδιες] ’Coisl. 1 ορμαις’ (perperam) || 11 σωματα]+ ω f || 12 αυτη] αὐτή ut vid cef ΙΙ ταύτα δε] + ω f ΙΙ 15 om η cdef
2.
1 τῷ τ. π. ἐρευνῶντι κτλ.] 1 Cor. ii 10.,
3.
3. τοῦ πρόσω] ‘no longer needs to advance.’
4.
ib. τὸ ἔσχ. ὀρεκτόν] ‘ the ultimate object of ’ The phrase comes originally from Arist. Metaph. xii 7.
5.
4. πολιτεία τ. ὑψηλοῦ] ‘all a high-minded man's life.’
6.
7. to begin with, God cannot be corporeal; which would involve being dissoluble.
7.
6. ὅλαις τ. λου....ἐφόδοις] The reading ὅλως (‘if you rely at all’) would not make so strong an argu- ment against Eunomian self-confidence. Ἔφοδος ‘method.’
8.
8. βασανιζόμενος] a logical pa- rallel to ὅλαις;—‘however much you rack it.’
9.
9. καυχ. εἰς τὰ ἄμετρα] ‘boasting of your command of the infinite.’
10.
ib. σῶμα] of course, a very un- likely alternative for the Eunomians to choose; and it must be admitted that Gr. somewhat begs the question as against them, in the next clause.
11.
ib. καἰ πῶς] sc. σῶμά ἐστιν (or ἄν εἴη).
12.
11. ἢ καἰ ταῦτα σ.] ‘Are bodies to be so described?’
13.
ib. τ. ἐξουσίας] ‘a stretch of power,’ to confer such properties upon a body!
14.
12. σῶμα μέν, οὐχὶ τ. δέ] ‘Will you make Him a body and drop these attributes?’ This Gr. terizes as ‘gross.’ For παχύτητος cp. § 4 τὸ παχὺ τοῦτο σαρκίον.
15.
13. ἵνα...ἔχῃ] B good example that not ‘final’ use of ἴνα which is familiar in the N.T.
16.
14. σεπτόν] from σέβεσθαι, ‘an object of devotion.’ Gr. mean that the fact of being περιγραπτόν would by itself preclude being σεπτόν, but that all that is connoted by περιγράπτῳ would.