Notes on the current edition
Χρονίων νούσων θεραπευτικών
1.
The common reading,
φυσίωσις, having no suitable meaning, Ermerins did right in altering this clause, agreeably to the suggestion of Wigan.
2.
Either
ἂν or something else seems to be wanting in this sentence.
3.
The common reading, instead of
μέγα, is
μετά; in Kühn's edition,
κατά. The reading I have introduced seems to me self-evident.
4.
Ermerins does right in substituting this word for
στορύνη. See, in particular, Pollux, and the note of Fëos, Oec. Hippocrat., under this word. It was a sort of ladle.
5.
The common reading in all the editions, except that of Ermerins, is
ἰσθμοειδῶν.
6.
Though I have not ventured to change
πυρίῃσι into
πυρῆνι, I have little doubt that the latter (which signifies the knob of a specillum or cautery) is the true reading. See P. ae. vi. 66,
et pluries.
7.
Ermerins suppresses
τῶ ἐμπάττειν altogether; and seemingly these are superfluous, and unsuitable to this place.
8.
The common reading is
σύκων δὲ ὀπώρη, which Ermerins has altered to
ὀπώρης δὲ σῦκα. It will be seen that, by a less violent change, I have succeeded in amending the text.
9.
Ermerins, following the suggestion of Petit, substitutes this word for
ἄμης, which is quite unsuitable to the place.
10.
Ermerins suppresses this clause altogether.
11.
Ermerins also erases these words, which do not seem to be needed. See, further, Petit and Wigan.
12.
I wonder that Ermerins should have thought it necessary to expunge these words. It appears to me that, from the commencement of this paragraph down to
τλήμονας, we have one of those long and complicated sentences in which Thucydides, Demosthenes, and other of the great writers of antiquity delighted. This style of composition is very different from the periodic style in which Roman, French, and English authors compose their works. Clarendon, Milton, and Cobbett are the best examples we have, in English, of the old Grecian style of writing in long sentences.
13.
That this is the true reading, and not
οἱ ἐνοικάδιοι γαλεοὶ, is quite obvious from Dioscorides, ii. 27. All the
γαλεοὶ were sea animals. See Appendix to Dunbar's Greek Lexicon.
14.
Ermerins, following the advice of Petit, by the addition of
μὴ, and slightly altering the punctuation, greatly improves the text in this place. Our author evidently alludes to the celebrated passage in the Epidemics of Hippocrates. See vol. i. p. 360, Syd. Soc. Edit.
15.
The common reading is
μηδὲ ἐν κύκλῳ στροφούμενον, for which Ermerins proposes to substitute the above, on the authority of a Parisian ms.
16.
I have not scrupled, in this sentence, to follow Ermerins in substituting
τριβέντων for
ἐνόντων, which has no meaning suitable to the place. The passage is still obscure.
17.
Instead of
ἐν μελλήσει, Ermerins reads
ἐμμέλης. I am doubtful.
18.
Wigan and Ermerins have very properly substituted this word for
νούσοισι. Petit suggests
ἐν τοῖσι ἄλλοισι.
19.
The common reading,
ἐγκοτεῖ, being evidently inadmissible, I have preferred the reading adopted by Ermerins, in preference to
ἐγκροτεῖ, as suggested by Petit, or
ἐγκύει as proposed by Wigan.
20.
Hippocrat. Prognost.
21.
It is so accented in all the mss. and editions.
22.
Wigan has substituted this reading for
θηραίῳ τῷ κρητί.
23.
The common reading is
ἢν καὶ ὡς πτισάνη μιγματώδης ὀπτίσθω; which Ermerins alters to
σμηγματώδης πτισθῆ, the meaning of which seems to me very equivocal.
24.
Though I have not ventured to alter the text, I must say that I think the true reading would be
φλεβῶν, instead of
ἑλκέων. I cannot see the significance of the latter, whereas the former is of frequent use with our author as applied to the liver.
25.
Liddel and Scott, conformably to analogy, but in opposition to general usage, read
σκῖρος.