Notes on the current edition
Ὀξέων νούσων θεραπευτικόν
1.
Ermerins ventures to substitute
αμφαίνουσι for this word, for no other reason but because he fancies it more suitable to the passage than the one in the text. Our author has in view Hippocrat. Prognost. 4.
2.
Ermerins, following in the wake of Wigan, suppresses, first, the clause
καὶ ὁρέωσι τὰ μὴ ὄντα; and, second,
ἢ ἀνθ’ ἑτέρων ἕτερα γιγνώσκωσι, as being mere glosses on the clauses connected with them. I must say, decidedly, that I cannot approve of such editorial practices. If the works of the ancient authorities are to be thus modified agreeably to the tastes and caprices of modern editors, we shall by-and-bye be at a loss to know what is ancient and what modern, in works reputed to be of olden date. And, moreover, although the clauses in question may not be indispensable to the meaning, I cannot but think that they give effect to the other clauses in this passage.
3.
I have adopted the reading substituted by Ermerins in place of the ordinary text which stood thus:
οὐδὲ μελίκρη τον , ἤν μὴ χολώδεες ἔωσι, εὔπεπτον γὰρ τοῖσι πικροχόλοισι. Petit proposes to improve the text by leaving out
μὴ, and substituting
ὕποπτον for
εὔπεπτον. But the emendation substituted by Ermerins seems preferable, being founded on the rules laid down by Hippocrates in his work,
On aliment in acute diseases. — See Syd. Soc. Edit. t. i.
4.
Ermerins erases the clause
ἀτενέες δὲ τὸ ξύμπαν ἔωσι altogether. By merely deleting the last word, and
δὲ in the following clause, I flatter myself that I have succeeded in emending the text satisfactorily.
5.
I have partially adopted Ermerins' very extensive alterations of the text in this place.
6.
The common reading is
πάχεϊ ἐπικαίριον, words of no meaning. Petit was the first to suggest
πικέριον, on which see Foes' Oeconom. Hippocrat. in voce; also Erotian.
7.
In the original the term
ὑδερώδεσι occurs before
ξὺν; for which Wigan suggests
ὑποχονδρίοισι, which Ermerins adopts; but, as will be seen, removes it a little way down the sentence.
8.
Ermerins does not hesitate to eject these five words from the text, without any good reason as far as I can see.
Τῶνδε applies only to the feet and hands.
9.
The last clause of this sentence seems decidedly to be corrupt. How much is it to be lamented that this eulogium on wine, which appears to be so judicious and so eloquent, should be marred, in so far, by the corruptions of the text! Petit suggests
ἑωυτέους ἐμπλέουσι, which would be an improvement of the sense, in my opinion; but it is rejected by Ermerins.
10.
I have adopted
ὀπτοῖσι instead of
ὀσπρίοισι, as suggested by Petit.
11.
Ermerins has entirely remodelled this passage — altering, ejecting, and introducing words, to make his author use the language which the editor fancies he ought to have used. I have adopted only a few of his changes.
12.
The reading in most of the mss.,
ἔκτευξιν ξυμφορῆς ξὺν ἐλαίῳ, has evidently no meaning. Petit mentions, that on the margin of a certain good ms. he found
ἐς ἔκφευξιν, which certainly gives a passable meaning, with little violence to the text. Wigan suggests
ξυμφέροι or
ξύμφερον ἑψεῖν. Ermerins creates a reading to suit his own faney —
ἐς τέγξιν ξύμφερον. Such a change appears to me utterly inadmissible as being both violent and introducing a meaning not suitable to the place. It will be seen that I have tried my skill in emending this passage — with what success,
judicent eruditi.
13.
In the text of all the mss. we read
ὑδὰρ, which is evidently a monstrosity. Upon the whole, I think it most probable that the Adarce is meant (see Ed. Gr. Lexicon
in voce). Ermerins expunges it altogether; and perhaps he does right; for
λημνῆστις and
ἀδάρκη were the same, or nearly the same, thing.
14.
Although some words are evidently wanting at the beginning, it is singular that there is no lacuna in any of the British mss.
15.
The text is not quite satisfactory; but we cannot venture to adopt the bold alteration introduced by Ermerins:
καὶ ἀλέη τῆς ζωῆς καὶ τοῦ σκήνεος τροφὴ ἐόν. The meaning seems to be, that it is the animal heat which imparts life to food introduced into the system.
16.
Wigan suggests the necessity of
οὐ before
χρὴ, and Ermerins accordingly adopts it.
17.
I have ventured to substitute
ἀχάριστον for
ἄχρηστον, and
καὶ for
εἰ. Ermerins changes
ἄχρηστον into
εὔχρηστον, and otherwise introduces very many alterations into the text.
18.
The text is very unsatisfactory.
19.
The common reading,
ἐόντα, is evidently inadmissible; and although Ermerins changes it into
ἐόντων, I cannot see that even then the text is much improved. I flatter myself that my amendment is both natural and obvious when suggested. See further towards the end of the chapter, where this term occurs.
20.
The common reading,
τείνει, Ermerins alters to
κτείνει on the authority of a Parisian ms. Maittaire holds
τείνει to be an example of an active verb taken in a passive signification (ed. Wigan). We would render it by
tenduntur, entenduntur,
we are on the stretch. Similar examples are in Latin; as,
prora avertit.
Virg. Aen. i. 104.
21.
I have adopted the conjectural arrangement of the words introduced by Ermerins.
22.
The common reading,
ὄρθιον ἔστω τὸ ἰνίον, is altered as above by the joint labours of Wigan and Ermerins.
23.
Although some words certainly appear to be wanting here and a short distance below, there is no lacuna in either place, in any of our British mss.
24.
Ermerins introduces most extensive alterations in this passage; but I have not ventured to adopt any of them. I have merely introduced
ἢ after
ξηρὰ, which the sense absolutely requires.
25.
The common reading is
τοῦ μὴ; but it is clear that the negative cannot stand with the words that follow:
τῆσι ἑτέρῃσι πλευρῇσι. Ermerins gets over the difficulty by suppressing the last three words. I have effected the same purpose by merely suppressing the negative
μή. I have adopted his reading of
ἀπʼ in place of
ὕπʼ, in the same sentence.
26.
Though I have not ventured to alter the text, I cannot but think that we ought to read
ἡ ψυχή. For in
λειποθυμία and
λειποψυχία, it surely is thought that the spirit for a time leaves the body — not that the body leaves the spirit. In the Iliad, the act of swooning is thus described:
Τὸν δ’ ἔλιπε ψυχὴ (v. 696); upon which words the scholion is,
οὖτος δὲ ἐλειποψύχησεν.
27.
Compare Williams on Pneumonia, Encyel. of Med., t. iii. 435.
28.
Hippocrat. de Aliment.; Fëos, t. i. 435.
29.
There is something inexplicable in this paragraph; for not only does no one of the other authorities recommend brains in the treatment of Pleurisy, but also no one says anything of roasting the brains of swine in their cauls. I suspect the text must be corrupt.
30.
The common reading is
εἴδων, for which Wigan and Ermerins properly substitute
ἁλῶν. I have made a few more alterations of my own, in justification of which, see Nonnus, Epit. 129.