Aretaeus of Cappadocia De causis et signis diuturnorum morborum libri duo 2

Francis Adams (Translator)

De causis et signis diuturnorum morborum libri duo. Aretaeus of Cappadocia. Francis Adams (Translator). London. 1856.

Funding provided by National Library of Medicine History of Medicine Division.

Current edition Perseus

On the Causes and Symptoms of Chronic Diseases (English) (Aretaeus. The Extant Works of Aretaeus, The Cappadocian. Adams, Francis, translator. Boston, MA: Milford House, Inc., 1972 (reprint); London: Sydenham Society, 1856.)

Editions (1)
Περὶ αἰτίων καὶ σημείων χρονίων παθῶν Perseus (Aretaeus. The Extant Works of Aretaeus, The Cappadocian. Adams, Francis, editor. Boston, MA: Milford House, Inc., 1972 (reprint); London: Sydenham Society, 1856.) — 2 focus

Notes on the current edition

On the Causes and Symptoms of Chronic Diseases

1. The Meloe vesicatoria. See Paulus Ægineta, Syd. Soc. edit., t.iii. p. 74; and Dioscorides, ii. 69.
2. Altogether, this interpretation is so unsatisfactory, that I was almost tempted to alter the text quite differently from Wigan and Ermerins, and to read ὁκοῖόν τις διαβησείων, when the passage might be rendered thus — it got the name of diabetes, as if signifying one having a frequent desire of descending, because the fluid does not remain in the system, but uses the man’s person as a ladder for its exit. At all events, the reading of Wigan and Ermerins seems inadmissible; for how can the two comparisons, to a siphon, and to a ladder, be admitted together? It is possible, however, that διαβάθρῃ is faulty, and that we ought to read διαβήτῃ.
3. The dipsas was a species of viper. See Paulus Ægineta, ii. p. 185.
4. A sort of condiment, containing garlic and other acrid things. See Pollux, Onomast. vi.
5. A thick soup prepared from various substances, that is to say, cheese, wine, etc. It is mentioned both in the Iliad and Odyssey.
6. On the composition of the ancient zythi, or Ales, see Appendix to the Edinburgh Greek Lexicon, in voce, ζύθος.
7.
Our author in this place evidently alludes to mentagra, a malignant disease of the face, very prevalent in Rome in his time, that is to say, towards the end of the first and the beginning of the second century. The first description of it which we possess, is contained in Pliny’s Nat. Hist. xxvi., at the beginning, and is to the following effect: That it was one of the new diseases of the face, which at one time had spread over most parts of Europe, but was then mostly confined to Rome: That it had been called by the Greeks, lichen, but that latterly the Latin term mentagra had been applied to it. He further asserts, that it was unknown in former times, and made its first appearance in Italy during the reign of Tiberius: that the men of the middle and lower classes, and more especially women, were exempt from it, the ravages of the disease being confined principally to the nobility, among whom it was propagated by kissing. He adds respecting it, that it was cured by caustics, the effects of which often left unseemly scars on the face. That the disease had come originally from Egypt, the mother of all such distempers.
Another very interesting account of the disease, under the names of lichen and mentagra, is given by Marcellus, the Empiric, in chap. cxix., wherein elephantiasis, lepra, and other inveterate diseases of the skin are described. He says that the distemper (vitium) when neglected is apt to spread all over the face, and to contaminate many persons. He prescribes various caustic and stimulant applications for it. Along with it, he gives a very good account of elephantiasis, which, he remarks, also generally begins in the face with vari and other appearances, similar to those described by our author. He states decidedly that the disease is endemical in Egypt, attacking not only the lower ranks, but even kings themselves.
Now it is worthy of remark, that beyond all question this is the disease to which frequent allusion is made by the poet Martial as prevailing extensively in Rome, and as being propagated by the fashionable practice of persons saluting one another, by kissing, in the streets. The following passages evidently allude to it— Epigr. xi.,8; xii. 59.
From all these descriptions, we cannot entertain a doubt, that the disease, then so prevalent in Rome, was of a malignant and contagious nature, which attacked principally the face, and was propagated by kissing ; and, further, that it was a disease of the same class as elephantiasis. Taking all these circumstances into account, one may venture to decide pretty confidently, that it was a disease akin to the Sivvens of Scotland, which it strikingly resembles in all its characters as described above. Sivvens, in short, is a species or variety of syphilis, which is readily communicated both by the mouth, as in kissing, and per coitum. Further, that Syphilis, and its congener Sivvens, are the brood of the ancient elephantiasis, no one at all acquainted with the history of the latter in ancient, mediæval, and modern times, will entertain a doubt. See the note to Paulus Ægineta, t. ii., 14, 15, 16, and the authorities there referred to: also, the History of Syphilis, as given in Sprengel’s and in Renouard’s History of Medicine.
The importance of this subject, which has never been satisfactorily illustrated elsewhere, will be my apology for embracing the present opportunity of endeavouring to throw some additional light on it.