Aretaeus of Cappadocia De causis et signis acutorum morborum libri duo 1

ed. Francis Adams

De causis et signis acutorum morborum libri duo. Aretaeus of Cappadocia. ed. Francis Adams. London. 1856.

Funding provided by National Library of Medicine History of Medicine Division.

Current edition Perseus

Περὶ αἰτίων καὶ σημείων ὀξέων παθών (Greek) (Aretaeus. The Extant Works of Aretaeus, The Cappadocian. Adams, Francis, editor. Boston, MA: Milford House, Inc., 1972 (reprint); London: Sydenham Society, 1856.)

Translations (1)
On the Causes and Symptoms of Acute Diseases Perseus (Aretaeus. The Extant Works of Aretaeus, The Cappadocian. Adams, Francis, translator. Boston, MA: Milford House, Inc., 1972 (reprint); London: Sydenham Society, 1856.) — 1 focus

Notes on the current edition

Περὶ αἰτίων καὶ σημείων ὀξέων παθών

1. In all the former editions, instead of τε πολλὴ, we read τὰ πολλὰ and, with the exception of that of Dr. Ermerins, all have καὶ before βληχρή. The Latin translation of this clause by Wigan, Kuhn, and Ermerins, is this:
nausea præcipué quidem post cibum, sed quæ per abstinentiam quoque lenté continuat,
which is evidently very loose and vague. That of Crassus is far more strict and accurate:
nausea frequentius quidem e cibis, non minimé tamen et ab inedia pusilla quædam nausea sequitur.
The English translation of the text as it formerly stood would run thus:
nausea for the most part, indeed, after food; but also, not unfrequently, slight nausea after abstinence.
It appears to me, however, that the meaning is so much improved by the slight change I have ventured to make, that I flatter myself no argument is required to prove it to be the true reading. The contrast between πολλὴ in the one case, and βληχρὴ in the other, is most suitable to the sense. That the repetition of καὶ is legitimate in this clause of the sentence, will not be questioned by any one who is familiar with the style of Galen. See, for example, De Locis Affectis, v.i., prope initium; t. iii p. 296, ed. Basil.
2.
The common reading in the mss. is εἴδεος, which is evidently inadmissible. Petit, in his commentary, suggests that the true reading is δέος ᾑ. Wigan also prefers πλησίον εἴη δέος. Ermerins accordingly reads πλησίον ἔῃ δέοσμ. None of these editors, however, refers to any authority for this expression, which appears to me quaint and unnatural —
but if the dread of a paroxysm be at hand
I prefer ἤδη on the authority of many parallel passages, as for example — πλησίον δὲ ἤδη τοῦ φρενίζειν ὄντες, Galen, de loc. affect. iii.; ἐνστάντος δὲ ἤδη τοῦ συμπτώματος, P. ae. iii. 5, in the chapter on epilepsy. Ermerins very properly restores it, in another passage of our author, where ἥδε had been substituted for it (Sympt. diut. morb. i. 9). Indeed ἤδη, in such cases, occurs frequently in the works of our author.
Moreover, in the margin of the celebrated Reiske's copy of Henisch's edition, there is found this emendation — ἤδη δέος. See G. Dindorf's Appendix to Kuhn's edition. The Latin translation of Crassus would agree very well with the reading I propose; while it is unsuitable to the text when δέος is admitted:
Quum vero accessio appropinquat.
3. The common reading in the mss. is καὶ ἐς τὴν ἡμετέρην σημασίην διώσατο. In the margin of the edition of Henisch we find ἡμέρην, which is adopted by Wigan. Ermerins transposes τὴν from before ἡμέρην, as above.
4. Dr. Ermerins, on pure conjecture, substitutes ξυνηγμέναι, as I think unnecessarily. Ἀνειμέναι may be interpreted literally,
inclining,
i.e.
drawn upwards.
See Foes Oec. Hippocrat., under ἀνιοῦται. Would not ἀνιέμεναι be a suitable reading? I have translated the passage accordingly.
5. The common reading before Ermerins was καὶ ἡ πνίξ. I have cheerfully adopted, also, his emendation of νυγμὸς into μυγμὸς, as suggested by Petit; and only wonder that neither of them refers to the Eumenides of aeschylus (l. 116) as an authority for this meaning of the term.
6. Homer, Iliad. iv. 421, ετ σεθ.
7. Hippocrat. Aph. v. 2.
8. The common reading is θανάτου ἡ φύσις, to which Ermerins adds ἥδε, which I have substituted for ἡ, so as to produce a suitable reading with little violence to the text.
9. The common reading, κακόν τι, is obviously at fault. The present reading is adopted by Ermerins, only using ἰγνύῃ in place of ἰγνύη. Still there is something unsatisfactory in the text. Ἰγνὺς and ἰγνύη are applied, in strictness, to the back part of the thigh at its lower extremity.
10. Ermerins adopts this reading, partly on the suggestions of Petit, and partly from the margin of Henisch. It is also the reading of the Askew ms. The common reading is ἕλκει. Neither the one nor the other is quite satisfactory.
11. I have followed Wigan and Ermerins in interchanging the places of συνάγχη and κυνάγχη as they stood in all the mss. I have also, like them, substituted ὁκόσοις for ὁκόσον; and have added ἐς before ἅπερ, on the authority of Ermerins. But all this patchwork still leaves the sentence in a very unsatisfactory condition.
12. Ermerins has substituted the two words above for ἀπετάθη and ἀπολυθὲν, which have no proper signification in this place. It must be admitted, that although some improvement, the substituted terms are not quite suitable; as it can scarcely be said, that an internal disease is
driven outwards
by an external application.
13. The common reading is ἐπάνηξε. The other word occurs in the ξοδεχ πηιλιππ., and is no doubt the true reading.
14. Hippocrates, Aphor. iii. 6. We are indebted to Ermerins for changing ἐρυθριῶσι into ἐρυθριώσῃ.
15. The common reading is ἔῃ instead of ἀὴρ; ἐς instead of ἡ; and ἐδωδὴν instead of ἐδωδή. Ermerins merely changes the ἔῃ into ἥδε. I trust every candid and learned reader will admit, that I have greatly improved the meaning by the slight changes which I have ventured to make. From the translation of Crassus, it may be inferred that he had read ἀὴρ, or at least had seen the necessity of introducing it into the text:
aer enim spirando siccus adducitur.
I need scarcely add, that in the old Ionic, which our author affects, ἀὴρ is often put in the feminine gender. This was also the case in old Latin. See A. Gellius, xiii. 19.
16. Ermerins suppresses the words ἀπὸ τῶν κριθέων; but this seems an unwarrantable liberty. By a small alteration I have made, the text becomes sufficiently amended. On the ancient ζψτηι, see Appendix to the Edinburgh Greek Lexicon.
17. Ermerins has ingeniously substituted the last two words for ἐμπόνων, a vocable of doubtful meaning.
18. Wigan and Ermerins read θερμῆς τῆς ἀναπνοῆς; but the alteration seems to me uncalled for. I should prefer ὑπὸ τῆς θερμῆς ἀναπνοῆς to their reading.
19. Hippocrat. de Morbis, iii. 16, t. vii. p.144, ed. Littr.
20. The negative seems to be required here. See Petit and Ermerins.
21. This is the reading in the Askew ms., which is approved of by Ermerins. There are considerable variations in the other editions.