Appian of Alexandria Civil Wars 4.4

Horace White (Translator)

View: By Section

Civil Wars. Appian of Alexandria. Horace White (Translator). New York. 1899.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Perseus

The Roman History: The Civil Wars (English) (Appianus. The Roman History of Appian of Alexandria, Volume 2: The Civil Wars. White, Horace, translator. New York: The Macmillan Company. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd. 1899.)

Editions (1)
Ἐμφυλίων Πρώτη Perseus (Appianus. Appiani Historia Romana, Volume 2. Mendelssohn, Ludwig, editor. Leipzig: Teubner, 1881.) — 4.4 focus

Notes on the current edition

Civil Wars

1. All the codices say Capua, but Schweighäuser gives two excellent reasons for considering this a copyist’s mistake for Caieta, which Livy tells us was the place. A third reason for so thinking is that Caieta was on the sea-shore, whereas Capua was a considerable distance inland. If Appian had written the word Capua he could hardly have said immediately afterward that one of the two parties conveying the news to Antony took ship for that purpose.
2. A fragment of Livy, preserved for us in the writings of Seneca Rhetor ( Suasoriœ, i. 7) gives us that historian’s account of the death of Cicero. It is placed in the Appendix to Book IV, together with other extracts from ancient writers touching the same event.
3. ἐμὲ κτείνατε πρὸ τούτου. This may mean, kill me before him, or kill me instead of him. The latter was the meaning intended, but the centurion interpreted it the other way for the sake of the jest.
4. ἐδεήθη τοῦ μοιχεύοντος αὐτὴν Ἀντωνίου. This sentence is probably corrupt. The translation is conjectural.
5. That the text is defective here is evident, for how could Vetulinus send his son across the straits to Messana if he were already in Sicily? Schweighäuser met the difficulty by substituting ἔπ εμψεν for ἐπέρασεν, i.e., he opened communications with Sextus Pompeius, instead of joining him in Sicily. Probably there is a lacuna in the text.
6. See iii. 95 supra, where mention is made of the trial of Brutus and Cassius in absentia, where one judge only voted for acquittal and was afterwards put on the list of the proscribed. Dion Cassius (xlvii. 49) refers to this man and gives him the name of Sicilius Coronas, which the French editors of that author (MM. Gros and Boissee) change to Icilius Coronas both on grounds of palaeography and on the authority of Appian. Plutarch refers to one Publicus Silicius, who was observed to shed tears when the condemnation of Brutus was announced, and who was afterwards put on the list of the proscribed for that reason. ( Life of Brutus, 27.)
7. Valerius Maximus (ix. 5. 4) says that the head of Caesetius Rufus, a senator, was brought to Antony while he was sitting at a banquet, and that all the others turned away their faces. Antony ordered that it be brought nearer, and, after looking at it carefully for some time, and while all were waiting to hear what he would say, he remarked: I have never known this man.