Appian of Alexandria Civil Wars 3.2

Horace White (Translator)

View: By Section

Civil Wars. Appian of Alexandria. Horace White (Translator). New York. 1899.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Perseus

The Roman History: The Civil Wars (English) (Appianus. The Roman History of Appian of Alexandria, Volume 2: The Civil Wars. White, Horace, translator. New York: The Macmillan Company. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd. 1899.)

Editions (1)
Ἐμφυλίων Πρώτη Perseus (Appianus. Appiani Historia Romana, Volume 2. Mendelssohn, Ludwig, editor. Leipzig: Teubner, 1881.) — 3.2 focus

Notes on the current edition

Civil Wars

1. καὶ εἰ δίκην ἤδη τοῖς πλείοσι δεδώκοιεν, ἢ καὶ τοῦδε εἶεν. All commentators are agreed that the last two words are corrupt; they convey no meaning. Among the numerous conjectures made by way of emendation that of Bekker seems the most reasonable, viz.: ἢ καὶ δώσοιεν, or would be punished. This reading has been followed in the translation. The Didot Latin version follows that of Schweighäuser, viz.: utrum poenas jam populo dedissent interfectores, aut saltem eas timerent; i.e. whether the murderers had already been punished by the people, or at least feared punishment.
2. Octavius went to Rome by way of Naples. In a letter to Atticus, written at Puteoli in April, Cicero says: Octavius arrived at Naples on the 14th Kalends. There Balbus saw him on the morning of the following day and on the same day came to me at Cumae to tell me that he was going to claim his inheritance; but, as you say, he will have a lively time with Antony. ( Ad Att. xiv. 10.) In another letter he writes: Octavius has arrived at the neighboring villa of Philippus. He is devoted to me. In the next letter he says: Octavius treats me with the greatest distinction and friendship. Some call him Caesar. Philippus does not; therefore I do not. I am sure that he cannot be a good citizen, so many of those around him threaten death to our friends and say that these things cannot be borne. What think you when this boy shall come to Rome where our liberators cannot live in safety? They will always be famous, and happy also in the consciousness of what they have done. But, unless I am deceived, we shall be flat on our backs. ( Ad Att. xiv. 12.)
3. Αὐτίκα τεθναίην, ἐπεὶ οὐκ ἄρ’ ἔμελλον ἑταίρῳ κτεινομένῳ ἐπαμῦναι.
4. The interpretation of this passage is doubtful. Schweighäuser thinks that Octavius means to say that he thanks Antony for opposing the proposition to reward the murderers, although he may have had a selfish interest in doing so.
5. Ἅμα δ’ οὐκ ἦσαν ἐκεῖνοι τυραννοκτόνοι εἰ μὴ καὶ φονεῖς ἦσαν: literally, these men were not tyrant-killers unless they were murderers also. I have followed the Latin version of Schweighäuser, which differs from those of his predecessors. He said that the text conveyed no clear meaning to him, and that his version was guesswork.
6. καὶ σὲ τὸ τῶν πλεόνων ὀρᾷν ἑχρῆν, ὕπατον ὄντα. Schweighäuser and his predecessors rendered these words: You as consul ought to see what would be agreeable to the majority ( quid placeret pluribus). The Didot version more properly renders it quid prodesset pluribus.
7. The truth was that Antony paid his own debts with Caesar’s money. So Cicero tells us in the second Philippic. Where, he asks, are the seven hundred million sesterces that were registered at the temple of Ops? His money was indeed a cause for mourning, yet if it was not to be returned to the rightful owners it might relieve us from taxes. But you owed four million sesterces on the Ides of March. How did it happen that you were free from debt on the Kalends of April? ( Phil. ii. 37.)
8. ἂν συμφρονῶσι: to which Schweighäuser adds σοι. All the codices except one read σωφρονῶσι, i.e., if they are wise. The Teubner edition adheres to the latter reading; the Didot to the former. I have preferred the former because it gives point to Antony’s advice. It furnishes a reason why Octavius should use his money in one way rather than in the other. It would enable him to get rid of his expensive allies.