Aristotle Poetics 23.6

Thomas Twining (Translator)

View: By Part
Other Poets take for their subject the actions of one person 1 , or of one period of time, or an action which, though one, is composed of too many parts. Thus, the author of the Cypriacs 2 , and of the Little Iliad 3 .

Poetics. Aristotle. Thomas Twining (Translator). London, UK. 1789.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Experimental

Poetics (Thomas Twining, 1789) (OCR draft) (English) (Thomas Twining's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1789 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (4)
Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) (Aristotle, Poetics. Immanuel Bekker, editor, Aristotelis Opera, volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1837.) — 23 focus
Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) Perseus (Aristotle, De arte poetica liber. Rudolf Kassel, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. Reference edition for passage alignment.) — 23 focus
Poetics, Greek text (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's Greek text of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 23 focus
Poetics, Greek text (Franz Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's 1839 Greek edition, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 23 focus
Translations (13)
Poetics (W. H. Fyfe) (OCR draft) Perseus (William Hamilton Fyfe's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, Loeb Classical Library, 1939 printing.) — 23 focus
Arabic Poetics (Badawī edition, 1953) (OCR draft) (The ancient Arabic translation of Aristotle's Poetics in ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī's 1953 edition.) — 23 focus
Poetics (S. H. Butcher, 1911) (OCR draft) Experimental (S. H. Butcher's English translation from Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art, fourth edition, 1911.) — 23 focus
Aristotle on the Art of Poetry (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 23 focus
The Poetic of Aristotle (Henry James Pye, revised 1792) (OCR draft) Experimental (Henry James Pye's revised 1792 English translation, corrected against the 1788 first edition, aligned to the Kassel reference edition, and supplied with a selective apparatus of substantive 1788 readings.) — 23.6 focus
and the lesser Iliad, are satisfied if they confine themselves to one person, one period of time or one action, though it may have many parts. Not more than one or two tragedies at the most, could be formed either from the Iliad or the Odyssey. But many might from the Cypriacs;
The Poetic of Aristotle (Theodore Alois Buckley) (OCR draft) Experimental (Theodore Alois Buckley's English translation, first published in 1850 and represented from the Henry G. Bohn 1857 printing; corrected against a second OCR and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 23.6 focus
and one action, consisting of many parts; as the authors of the Cypriacs, and the Lesser Iliad. [With respect to the Iliad 1 and Odyssey, therefore, one or two tragedies only could be made from each. But many might be made from the Cypriacs; and from the Lesser Iliad more than eight;
Poetica Latine conversa (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's Latin translation, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 23 focus
La poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) Experimental (André Dacier's French translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1692.) — 23.6 focus
Il n'en eſt pas de même des autres Poëtes, ils s'imaginent conſerver cette unité de ſujet, lorſqu'ils s'attachent à décrire les actions d'un ſeul homme, ou les accidens arrivez dans un certain temps, ou une ſeule Hiſtoire qui a pluſieurs parties, & telle eſt la conduite du Poëte qui a fait les Cypriaques, & de celuy qui a fait la petite Iliade.
Poetica d'Aristotile (Bernardo Segni, 1549) (OCR draft) Experimental (Bernardo Segni's 1549 Florentine Italian translation, aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 23 focus
De poetica (Antonio Riccobono, 1587) (OCR draft) Experimental (Antonio Riccobono's Latin translation, first published in 1587; text represented from Immanuel Bekker's 1831 edition.) — 23 focus
De arte poetica liber (William of Moerbeke, ca. 1277) (OCR draft) Experimental (William of Moerbeke's medieval Latin translation, represented by the 1953 Aristoteles Latinus edition.) — 23 focus
Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition) (OCR draft) Experimental (The Arabic translation attributed to Abū Bishr Mattā, edited by Jaroslaus Tkatsch in 1928 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 23 focus
Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition, unaligned) (OCR draft) Experimental (Tkatsch's edition of the medieval Arabic translation in its original, unaligned segmentation.) — 23 focus

Notes on the current edition

Poetics

1. Part II. Sect. 5.
2. Of this kind seems the Poem of Ariosto, the exordium of which, not only expresses the miscellaneous variety of his matter, but, also, his principle of unity. Le Donne, i cavalier, l'arme, gli amori, Le cortesie, l'audaci imprese, io canto, Che furo al TEMPO che passaro i Mori, &c. Ariosto's expedient was, to "intertwist the several actions together, in order to give something like the appearance of one action," to the whole, as has been observed of Spenser: [Letters on Chivalry, &c.] he has given his Poem the continuity of basket-work. Or, if I may be indulged in another comparison, his unity, is the unity produced between oil and vinegar by shaking them together; which only makes them separate by smaller portions.
3. So called, to distinguish it from the Iliad of Homer, of which it seems to have been a continuation. See the NOTE.

Commentary

Commentary on the Poetics (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) (Ingram Bywater's English commentary on Aristotle's Poetics.) focus

4. mvp-aristotle-comment-874

τοῦτο δρῶσι = ὁμοίας ἱστορίας τὰς συνήθεις τιθέασι (v. a 21).

5. mvp-aristotle-comment-875

ἤδη: 8, 1451 a 23 sqq.

5. mvp-aristotle-comment-876

33 εὐσύνοπτος: see on 7, 1451 a 4 .

5. mvp-aristotle-comment-877

34 ἢ τῷ μεγέθει μετριάζοντα κτέ. Vahlen supposes ἔδει or ἀναγκαῖον ἦν εἶναι to be understood from the ἔμελλεν ἔσεσθαι in the preceding clause. The sense of the passage is clear enough: The Trojan War was a real whole in itself ( ἔχοντα ἀρχὴν καὶ τέλος = ὅλον; v. 7, 1450 b 26 ); but Homer declined to deal with it in its entirety ( ποιεῖν ὅλον), through a feeling apparently that it was too long for his purpose ( λίαν μέγας; comp. 7, 1451 a 15 ), or if not too long ( τῷ μεγέθει μετριάζοντα), too full of matter through the variety of incident in it ( καταπεπλεγμένον τῇ ποικιλίᾳ). The explanation of the grammatical difficulty may perhaps be that Aristotle has lapsed into obliqua oratio. λίαν γὰρ ἂν μέγας κτέ. is virtually oratio obliqua, like the clause of explanation in 3, 1448 a 33.
μετριάζοντα
is intransitive, as it generally is in Aristotle ( Bon. Ind. 463 b 23). For the dative with it comp. Pol. 5. 11, 1314 b 33
μετριάζειν τοῖς τοιούτοις
.

5. mvp-aristotle-comment-878

35 ἓν μέρος ἀπολαβών: comp. Bon. Ind. 82 b 49, and Plato Rep. 392 E
οὐ κατὰ ὅλον ἀλλ᾽ ἀπολαβὼν μέρος τι πειράσομαί σοι ἐν τούτῳ δηλώσαι βούλομαι
. By this ἓν μέρος in the history of the Trojan War Aristotle means the 'Wrath of Achilles' and its consequences; see Adam l. c. p. 43. αὐτῶν, scil. τῶν ἐν τῷ πολέμῳ πραγμάτων, a construction κατὰ σύνεσιν such as we often find with pronouns (comp. 13, 1453 a 24 ; 23, 1459 a 29 , and Kühner, Gr. Gr. 2. 1, p. 54). Vahlen quotes Eth. N. 4. 1, 1120 a 2
δοκεῖ δ᾽ ἀπώλειά τις αὑτοῦ εἶναι καὶ ἡ τῆς οὐσίας φθορά, ὡς τοῦ ζῆν διὰ τούτων
(= τῶν χρημάτων, implied in τῆς οὐσίας)
ὄντος
.

5. mvp-aristotle-comment-879

37 διαλαμβάνει: comp. Dionysius Hal. 5 p. 543 R.
τὸ διαλαμβάνεσθαι τὴν ὁμοείδειαν ἰδίαις μεταβολαῖς καὶ ξένοις ἐπεισοδίοις
. The proper meaning of the word is 'to break the continuity of' a thing, as in Phys. 4. 6, 213 b 32
οὐκ ἔστι διάστημα . . διαλαμβάνει τὸ πᾶν σῶμα ὥστε εἶναι μὴ συνεχές
. Its present meaning, that of to 'break the uniformity of', or 'diversify', is found also in Plato Phaed. 110 B
γῆ . . χρώμασι διειλημμένη
. Closely allied to this is the sense in Pol. 7. 12, 1331 a 20
τὰ δὲ τείχη διειλῆφθαι φυλακτηρίοις καὶ πύργοις
—where it denotes to 'break the line of the walls', not the walls themselves. The use of episodes as giving an element of variety in the Epic is noted again in 24, 1459 b 30 . An echo of Aristotle's approval of Homer's episodes survives in Eustathius on Il. 3. 230, p. 409, 20 R. :
οὕτως εὐμηχάνως Ὅμηρος τὰς ἔξω τε [? ἔξωθεν] τοῦ νῦν καιροῦ ἱστορίας ἐπεισοδιάζει τῇ ποιήσει καὶ ταῖς μεθόδοις αὐτὴν καταποικίλλει τῶν ἀφηγήσεων
, and in the Schol. on Od. 1. 284 :
τῆς Ὀδυσσείας οὐκ ἐχούσης ἐξ αὐτῆς ποικιλίαν ἱκανὴν τὸν Τηλέμαχον ἐξελθεῖν εἰς Σπάρτην καὶ Πύλον ποιεῖ, ὅπως ἂν τῶν Ἰλιακῶν ἐν παρεκβάσεσι πολλὰ λεχθείη διά τε τοῦ Νέστορος καὶ τοῦ Μενελάου
(comp. the second Schol. ad loc.:
ὑπόθεσιν αὐτὴν [scil. τὴν ἀποδημίαν Τηλεμάχου] πεποίηκεν ὁ ποιητὴς ποικιλίας λόγων καὶ ἐξαλλαγῆς ἰδεῶν, ἵνα μὴ μονότροπος ᾖ τῆς ποιήσεως ὁ τρόπος
).
1
1459b

6. mvp-aristotle-comment-880

περὶ ἕνα ποιοῦσι κτέ.: i. e. they write just like chroniclers (comp. 23) or biographers (comp. 8, 1451 a 21 ). In some of the inferior epics, however, there is, says Aristotle, a certain Unity of story; but it is not of the right kind (comp. 8, 1451 a 28
περὶ μίαν πρᾶξιν οἷαν λέγομεν
), as the action there consists of a plurality of parts ( πολυμερή), each of them easily detached from the rest of the work. The consequence is that several tragedies may be made out of a single epic of this type; whereas the Iliad or Odyssey does not supply materials for more than one or two. This emphatic assertion of the Unity of action in the Homeric epic, and of its affinity in this respect to Tragedy, is not quite in harmony with what we read elsewhere in the Poetics. In 18, 1456 a 13 the story of the Iliad is said to be a πολύμυθον σύστημα, one with a plurality of stories in it, and therefore incapable of being successfully dramatized in one single tragedy. And in 26, 1462 b 3 we are expressly told that the action in the Iliad and Odyssey is made up of several actions ( ἐκ πλειόνων πράξεων) and of many parts ( ἔχει πολλὰ τοιαῦτα μέρη); in other words, it is conceived to be a μία πρᾶξις πολυμερής, and not so unlike that of the inferior epics as is assumed in the present passage. μίαν πρᾶξιν = περὶ μίαν πρᾶξιν (comp. 8, 1451 a 28 ).

6. mvp-aristotle-comment-881

2 ὁ τὰ Κύπρια ποιήσας: Herodotus 2. 117
δηλοῖ ὅτι οὐκ Ὁμήρου τὰ Κύπρια ἔπεά ἐστι ἀλλ᾽ ἄλλου τινός
. — Athenaeus 334 B
ὁ τὰ Κύπρια ποιήσας ἔπη, εἴτε Κύπριός τίς ἐστιν Στασῖνος ἢ ὅστις δή ποτε χαίρει ὀνομαζόμενος
. For the ancient ideas as to the authorship of the Κύπρια see Welcker, Ep. Cycl.p. 279 (comp. Wilamowitz, Phil. Untersuch.7 p. 337 ).

6. mvp-aristotle-comment-882

3 τὴν μικρὰν Ἰλιάδα = ὁ τὴν μικρὰν Ἰλιάδα (comp. Bon. Ind. 109 b 48). The book is treated as anonymous even by Pausanias (3. 26, 7 and 10. 26, 2) and by several of the grammarians who quote from it (comp. Wilamowitz l.c. p. 341). Ἰλιάδος, 'a poem like the Iliad' (see on 4, 1448 b 38 ).

Remarques sur la poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) (André Dacier's French commentary on Aristotle's Poetics.) focus

7. mvp-aristotle-comment-538

23.5 7. C'est pourtant en cela que pechent la plupart des Poëtes, c'est auſſi en cela comme je l'ay déja dit, qu' Homere me paroît divin au prix d'eux, car ayant devant luy une guerre qui avoit un commencement & une fin, il n'a pas entrepris de la traiter toute entiere.] 1

8. mvp-aristotle-comment-539

23.5 8. C'est pourquoy il n'en a pris qu'une seule partie.] 2

9. mvp-aristotle-comment-540

23.5 9. Et il tire du reſte quantité d'Epiſodes, comme le Catalogue des Vaiſſeaux, & pluſieurs autres, dont il enrichit & diverſifie fon Poëme.] 3

10. mvp-aristotle-comment-541

23.6 10. Il n'en eſt pas de mème des autres Poëtes, ils s'imaginent conſerver cette unité de ſujet, lorſqu'ils s'attachent à décrire les actions d'un ſeul homme.] 4

11. mvp-aristotle-comment-542

23.6 11. Ou les accidens arrivez dans un certain temps.] 5

12. mvp-aristotle-comment-543

23.6 12. Et telle est la conduite du Poëte qui a fait les Cypriaques.] 6

13. mvp-aristotle-comment-544

23.6 13. Et de celuy qui a fait la petite Iliade.] 7

Commentary on the Poetics (Thomas Twining, 1789) (OCR draft) (Thomas Twining's notes on Aristotle's Poetics, aligned to the Kassel reference edition.) focus

210. mvp-aristotle-comment-210

NOTE 210.

23.4 P. 115. EVEN IN THIS, THEREFORE, &C.
Ἤδη καὶ ταύτῃ.
already even in the first operation of his genius—the very choice of his subject, and formation of his plan. Such appears to me to be the force of
ἤδη
in this passage, which, I think, is injured by those commentators who punctuate—
ὥσπερ ἔιπομεν ἤδη
"as we have already said."

211. mvp-aristotle-comment-211

NOTE 211.

23.4 P. 115. HE HAS, FROM THE REST, INTRODUCED MANY EPISODES—
Νῦν δὲ, ἓν μέρος ἀπολαβὼν, ἐπεισοδίοις κέχρηται ΑΥΤΩΝ πολλοῖς.
—i. e. as the commentators explain it, of the other parts of the war. But, what should we think of this English—
"Selecting one part of the war, he introduces many episodes of them?"
If Aristotle meant the other parts of the war,
ἀυτῶν
must, surely, be wrong: if
ἀυτῶν
be right, I confess I cannot see what he meant. I wish we had manuscript authority for the
ἀυτοῦ
of Heinsius, which is adopted and explained by Le Bossu, II. 5, and 6. —But a learned friend has suggested to me a conjecture still more probable; that Aristotle wrote
ΑΛΛΩΝ. Νῦν δὲ, ἝΝ μέρος ἀπολαβὼν, ἐπεισοδίοις κέχρηται ΑΛΛΩΝ [sc. μερῶν] πολλοῖς.
"Selecting one part only of the war, he has, from other parts, introduced many Episodes,"
&c.

212. mvp-aristotle-comment-212

NOTE 212.

23.6 P. 115. THE AUTHOR OF THE CYPRIACS, AND OF THE LITTLE ILIAD.
To the authors usually referred to on the subject of these Poems, it may now be useful to add Heyne, Excursu primo ad Æn. II. p. 228, 229 —a very learned and curious dissertation concerning the writers on the Trojan war.

213. mvp-aristotle-comment-213

NOTE 213.

23.6 P. 116. THE FALL OF TROY.
See Heyne, Excursu primo ad Æn. II. p. 230, 231.

Commentary on the Poetics (Henry James Pye, 1792) (OCR draft) (Henry James Pye's 1792 English commentary, aligned to the Kassel reference edition.) focus

23.4. mvp-aristotle-comment-99 23.4

HE DID NOT EVEN ATTEMPT TO INCLUDE THE WHOLE TROJAN WAR.

MR. ADDISON I believe thought he paid the Duke of Marlborough an hyperbolical compliment, when he called the transactions of the summer, in which the battle of Blenheim was fought, • An Iliad rifing out of one campaign." When on examination the action of the Iliad takes up only forty-feven days. Bossu has alfo calculated the duration of the action of the Odyssey and the Æneid. He fixes the former at fifty-eight days, and the latter at half a year. It is impossible to apply these critical compasses to a poem whose action passes • Beyond the flaming bounds of space and time. It is obvious however that the Paradise Lost is confined within such a period, that the connection of the [L] beginning, the middle, and the end is easily comprehended; and that though the action is continued, it enters sufficiently into detail to be perfectly interesting [M]. [L] See Chap. VIII.. [M] See Note 11. Chap. xxiv. NOTE

23.5. mvp-aristotle-comment-100 23.5

TAKING THEREFORE ONLY ONE PART FOR HIS SUBJECT, НЕ INTRODUCES ABUNDANCE OF EPISODES FROM THE OTHER PARTS.

- FROM what is said by Aristotle in Chapter XVII. where he gives the plain story of the Iphigenia in Tauris, and the Odyssey, it appears that he confiders every thing as episode that is at all extraneous to the fimple story. Every thing in short, that if either taken away or altered, would make no essential change in the principal event of the fable; and even the episode, he adds, should be nearly connected with the story, as he instances in the madness of Orestes. The fame injunction as to the epopee is infinuated here, as the episodes of Homer are faid to be taken from the events of the war, of which he brings the catalogue of the ships as an example. However Homer did not confine himself always to these congenial episodes as in the history of Bellerophon given by Glaucus in the fixth Iliad.
From what Ariftotle says, and the examples he produces in both places, he feems to make this distinction between the dramatic and epic episode. That the first should be an event, though not essentially, yet closely connected with the story, and happening to one of the characters as the madness of Orestes, and not any detached circumstance, any interesting under-plot which in so short a composition as a tragedy would hurt the unity, and divide the interest of the fable. (N) But that the epopee from [N] See Chap. xxvi. its
POETIC OF ARISTOTLE. its greater extent, to which variety was more necessary, and from its interest being less compressed, and in which so powerful an effect was not requifite, was indulged with a freer use of episodes, in themselves interesting, provided they were connected at all with the main fubject; even so interesting as to form a proper basis for a tragedy. This however he does not propose so much as an addition to the excellencies of the epopee, as an indulgence allowed to its defects. The Paradife Loft abounds with episodes, all of which are connected with the fable. The modern comic epopee affords examples of all forts. The worst are those like the novels introduced in Don Quixote, such as [o] the 'Ill-timed Curiosity,' which Fielding has imitated in the story of, The Man of the Hill' in Tom Jones, and Paul and Leonard' in Joseph Andrews. These episodes exactly resemble the eastern arrangement of fable. The story of Cardenio and Lucinda' in Don Quixote, and still more • Nightingale and Mrs. Miller's Daughter' in Tom Jones, are episodes connected with the fable. Perhaps the true criterion of the propriety of an epic episode is the possibility of the reader's passing it over without breaking, in the least degree, the chain of the narrative. [O] IL CURIOSO IMPERTINENTE, which has been wisely rendered in English, THE CU- RIOUS IMPERTINENT, CHAP.

Commentarius in Aristotelis Poeticam (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) (Ritter's Latin commentary, extracted from the 1839 volume, divided by Ritter's chapters and sections, and linked to the corresponding Perseus reference subsections.) focus

3. mvp-aristotle-comment-171

Ritter, cap. 23 § 3

σχεδόν δὲ οἱ πολλοὶ τῶν ποιητῶν τοῦ - το δρῶσιν : sententiam hanc sane gravem ac fortasse subiniquam mitigavit addito σχεδόν. ceteri Graecorum epici poetae Homero excepto non eam unitatis normam secuti sunt, quam summus artis poeticae magister praescripsit, sed ita tantummodo observaverunt ut accederent aliquatenus ad rationem in rerum scriptoribus probatam. διό, ὥσπερ εἴπομεν ἤδη-καταπεπλεγμένον τῇ ποικιλίᾳ : quod auctor occasione oblata iam ante (c. 8, 3) monuerat et Odysseae exemplo illustraverat, idem h. 1. ita persequitur ut Iliadem solam respiciat. Homerus in condenda Iliade duobus modis excellit, primum quod bellum Troianum non totum carmine celebrare adgressus est, deinde quod ne summa quidem fastigia rerum in modicam magnitudinem con-... tracta sed nimía varietate implicata poemati materiam substravit. enuntiati duo membra coordinata sunt, unum τῷ μηδὲ τὸν πόλεμον ἐπιχειρῆσαι ποεῖν ὅλον, alterum ἢ τῷ (intellige μηδ' ἐπιχειρῆσαι ποιεῖν) μεγέθει μετριάζοντα καταπεπλεγμένον τῇ ποικιλίᾳ. Iliada esse ἁπλῆν non multo post (c. 24, 3) iterum monuit. ἐπεισοδίοις κέχρηται [ αὐτῶν] πολλοῖς: pronomen αὐτῶν adhuc explicare nemo ita potuit, ut linguae Graecae legibus satisfaceret. Victorius et Hermannus belli Troiani partes ab Homero omissas designari putant, sed id quomodo fieri possit, neuter explicuit. Hermannus auctoris negligentiam agnoscit; alii coniecturis sanare locum tentaverunt. mihi haec vox plane supervacanea casu illata videtur esse: nimirum adversus ἀπολαβών in margine aliquis posuit αὐτῶν, isque intellexit μερῶν τοῦ πολέμου ex praecedente ἓν μέρος, ut ne lectorem fugeret quo ἀπολαβών referendum esset. hinc nota in verborum contextum, sed alieno loco, recepta est. οἱ δ᾽ ἄλλοι: intelligit poetas cyclicos et Panyasin Halicarnassensem, Choerilum Samium, Antimachum Colophonium. conf. c. 8. · καὶ μίαν πρᾶξιν πολυμερῆ: actio carmini epico subiecta non solum ita una esse debet ut unius hominis et unius temporis sit, sed etiam una parte primaria illam contineri oportet. minus epopoeiae vitii inest quae circa unam actionem eamque πολυμερή versatur quam quae duplex argumentum vel multiplex admisit. vitium illud prius et levius in Cypriis et parva Iliade deprehendit, et rectissime quidem, ut etiamnum ex illis Chrestomathiae Proculianae excerptis videre licet. μία πρᾶξις Cyprio carmini subiecta origo erat belli Troiani, sed eam vel maxime πολυμερῆ fuisse fragmenta quae dixi probant. parvae Iliadis nonnisi priorum quattuor librorum summaria excerpta illa praestant: nam Proclus rerum gestarum seriem contexturus ubi quattuor libros parvae Iliadis excerpsit, hanc mittit et ad Arctini Ἰλίου Πέρσιν pergit, quamquam etiam a parvae Iliadis poeta (Lesches a plerisque fertur carminis auctor, ab aliis in incerto relinquitur in quibus Aristoteles) Ilii excidium enarratum fuisse constat. conf. Hermanni ad h. 1. Commentarii, Wüllneri de Cyclo epico Commentatio p. 85 sqq., Welckeri opus quod patria lingua scripsit de Cyclo epico p. 214 sqq. Nitzschii de Historia Homeri Meletem. fasc. II. p. 38 sqq. de Cypriis praeter alios exposuerunt Wüllnerus et Welckerus in libris modo laudatis, et peculiari scriptione Henrichsen: de Carminibus Cypriis, Hafniae 1828.