Aristotle Poetics 11.10

Thomas Twining (Translator)

View: By Part
Disasters comprehend all painful or destructive actions; the exhibition of death, bodily anguish, wounds, and every thing of that kind.

Poetics. Aristotle. Thomas Twining (Translator). London, UK. 1789.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Experimental

Poetics (Thomas Twining, 1789) (OCR draft) (English) (Thomas Twining's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1789 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (4)
Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) (Aristotle, Poetics. Immanuel Bekker, editor, Aristotelis Opera, volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1837.) — 11 focus
Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) Perseus (Aristotle, De arte poetica liber. Rudolf Kassel, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. Reference edition for passage alignment.) — 11 focus
Poetics, Greek text (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's Greek text of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 11 focus
Poetics, Greek text (Franz Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's 1839 Greek edition, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 11 focus
Translations (13)
Poetics (W. H. Fyfe) (OCR draft) Perseus (William Hamilton Fyfe's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, Loeb Classical Library, 1939 printing.) — 11 focus
Arabic Poetics (Badawī edition, 1953) (OCR draft) (The ancient Arabic translation of Aristotle's Poetics in ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī's 1953 edition.) — 11 focus
Poetics (S. H. Butcher, 1911) (OCR draft) Experimental (S. H. Butcher's English translation from Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art, fourth edition, 1911.) — 11 focus
Aristotle on the Art of Poetry (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 11 focus
The Poetic of Aristotle (Henry James Pye, revised 1792) (OCR draft) Experimental (Henry James Pye's revised 1792 English translation, corrected against the 1788 first edition, aligned to the Kassel reference edition, and supplied with a selective apparatus of substantive 1788 readings.) — 11.10 focus
or wounds or other things of that nature. 1
The Poetic of Aristotle (Theodore Alois Buckley) (OCR draft) Experimental (Theodore Alois Buckley's English translation, first published in 1850 and represented from the Henry G. Bohn 1857 printing; corrected against a second OCR and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 11.10 focus
such as death when it is obvious, grievous pains, wounds, and such like particulars 6.]
Poetica Latine conversa (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's Latin translation, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 11 focus
La poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) Experimental (André Dacier's French translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1692.) — 11.10 focus
J'appelle paſſion, une action qui détruit quelque perſonnage, ou qui cauſe de violentes douleurs, comme ſont les morts évidentes & certaines, les tourmens, les bleſſures, & toutes les autres choſes ſemblables.
Poetica d'Aristotile (Bernardo Segni, 1549) (OCR draft) Experimental (Bernardo Segni's 1549 Florentine Italian translation, aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 11 focus
De poetica (Antonio Riccobono, 1587) (OCR draft) Experimental (Antonio Riccobono's Latin translation, first published in 1587; text represented from Immanuel Bekker's 1831 edition.) — 11 focus
De arte poetica liber (William of Moerbeke, ca. 1277) (OCR draft) Experimental (William of Moerbeke's medieval Latin translation, represented by the 1953 Aristoteles Latinus edition.) — 11 focus
Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition) (OCR draft) Experimental (The Arabic translation attributed to Abū Bishr Mattā, edited by Jaroslaus Tkatsch in 1928 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 11 focus
Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition, unaligned) (OCR draft) Experimental (Tkatsch's edition of the medieval Arabic translation in its original, unaligned segmentation.) — 11 focus

Commentary

Commentary on the Poetics (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) (Ingram Bywater's English commentary on Aristotle's Poetics.) focus

10. mvp-aristotle-comment-420

πρᾶξις φθαρτικὴ ἢ ὀδυνηρά κτέ.: compare the enumeration of 'things piteous' ( ἐλεεινά) in Rhet. 2. 8, 1386 a 4
ὅσα τε γὰρ τῶν λυπηρῶν καὶ ὀδυνηρῶν φθαρτικά, πάντα ἐλεεινά, καὶ ὅσα ἀναιρετικά, καὶ ὅσων ἡ τύχη αἰτία κακῶν μέγεθος ἐχόντων
. ἔστι δ᾽ ὀδυνηρὰ μὲν καὶ φθαρτικὰ θάνατοι καὶ αἰκίαι σωμάτων καὶ κακώσεις καὶ γῆρας καὶ νόσοι καὶ τροφῆς ἔνδεια κτέ,

10. mvp-aristotle-comment-421

ἐν τῷ φανερῷ θάνατοι: i.e. violent deaths on the stage, before the eyes of the spectators, such as Horace condemns in A. P. 185 ( comp. Tumlirz, Die tragischen Affecte Mitleid und Furcht nach Aristoteles, p. 16).

10. mvp-aristotle-comment-422

περιωδυνίαι signifies bodily agonies, as the context shows; comp. Eth. E. 1. 5, 1215 b 18
πολλὰ γάρ ἐστι ταιαῦτα τῶν ἀποβαινόντων, δι' προΐενται τὸ ζῆν, οἷον νόσους περιωδυνίας χειμῶνας
.

10. mvp-aristotle-comment-423

ὅσα τοιαῦτα serves to include the less physical forms of pain. In the Oedipus Tyrannus, which Aristotle so constantly holds up as the perfect model of a tragedy, the πάθος is the mental anguish of Oedipus ( O. T. 1317 sqq. ) much more than the physical horror of his self-inflicted blindness.

Remarques sur la poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) (André Dacier's French commentary on Aristotle's Poetics.) focus

13. mvp-aristotle-comment-279

11.10 J'appelle paſſion, une action qui détruit quelque perſonnage.] 1

14. mvp-aristotle-comment-280

11.10 Comme font les morts evidentes & certaines.] 2

Commentary on the Poetics (Thomas Twining, 1789) (OCR draft) (Thomas Twining's notes on Aristotle's Poetics, aligned to the Kassel reference edition.) focus

86. mvp-aristotle-comment-86

NOTE 86. P. 86.

11.10 DISASTERS, COMPREHEND ALL PAINFUL OR DESTRUCTIVE ACTIONS, &C.
It seems hardly reconcilable with philosophical accuracy, to use such an expression as
ΠΑΘΟΣ ἐστι ΠΡΑΞΙΣ
—defining the suffering to BE the action that causes the suffering. In his Metaphysics he puts it thus : —
τα μεγεθη των συμφορων και λυπηρων ΠΑΘΗ λεγεται.
This word,
παθος
, in the sense here used, is very embarrassing to a translator. The word passion, in this sense, of suffering, is, with us, appropriated to a subject, from which it cannot, without a sort of profanation, be transferred to any other. The French, however, have done this without scruple, though the word, when so applied, must be explained before it can be understood. Upon the whole, I could find no single words that seemed to me to answer so nearly to
παθος
, and its adjective,
παθητικην
, in the sense in which they are used here, and in cap. xviii. as disaster, and its correspondent adjective, disastrous. Their original,
desastre
, is explained in the Dict. of the French Academy , by "accident funeste."
"Wherein I spoke of most disastrous chances, Of moving accidents [
παθη
] by flood, and field."
Othello, Act I. Sc. III.

87. mvp-aristotle-comment-87

NOTE 87. P. 86.

11.10 THE EXHIBITION OF DEATH, &c.
Ἐν τῷ φανερῳ θανατοι.
—A plain passage, which the commentators seem to have taken great pains to perplex with difficulties of their own invention. The plain meaning of the expression is, exhibited on the stage :
ἐν ὀφθαλμοις φαινομενου ΤΟΥ ΠΑΘΟΥΣ
, as it is expressed in the Rhetoric, lib. ii. cap. viii. p. 560. Aristotle is here only explaining the term
παθος
; not laying down a rule, nor deciding concerning the propriety, or impropriety, of such exhibitions. Nothing is more evidently absurd, than the attempts of Dacier and other French critics to transfer the delicacy of their theatre to that of the antients. The scrupulous delicacy of French Tragedy was, I believe, as unknown to the Athenian stage, as its rigid and strutting dignity. A single passage, and that, from the most polished of the three Greek Tragic Poets whose works are extant, may sufficiently prove this; I mean the description of Oedipus tearing out his own eyes, in Sophocles.
Τοιαυτ᾿ ἐφυμνων, πολλακις τε κοὐχ᾿ ἀπαξ
Ἤρασσ᾿, ἐπαιρων βλέφαρα φοινίαι δ᾿ ὁμοῦ
Γλῆναι γενει᾿ ἐτεγγον· οὐδ᾿ ἀνιεσαν
Φονα μύδωσας σταγονας· ἀλλ᾿ ὁμοῦ μελας
Ὄμβρος χαλάζης αιματος ἐτεγγετο.
Oed. Tyr. v. 1284.
1
"Thus oft exclaiming, he his eyelids raised,
And rent the orbs of sight; the bleeding balls
Imbath'd his cheeks, nor ceased the gushing drops,
But rain'd a shower of black and streaming gore."
Potter's Translation.
But Sophocles did not confine himself to description. Oedipus himself immediately appears upon the stage, and exhibits the shocking spectacle of his bloody eyes to the audience. Certainly, the French rule,
"de ne pas ensanglanter le Theatre,"
was not much more strictly observed here by Sophocles, than it was by Shakspeare in his LEAR, where Gloster's eyes are trodden out,
ἐν φανερῳ
, upon the stage.
I cannot quit this instance from Sophocles, without diverting the reader, (for I am persuaded it will divert him,) with Pere Brumoy's apology, or, rather, with the joint apology of him, M. Dacier, and Boileau.
"Le grand CORNEILLE et ses successeurs Tragiques, ont crû que ce seroit une chose horrible d'exposer Oedipe aveugle et sanglant aux yeux des spectateurs. M. Dacier leur repond trés-bien par ces vers de DESPREAUX, Art Poet. chant ii."
Theatre des Grecs, i. 345.
"Il n'est point de serpent, ni de monstre odieux,
Qui par l'art imité ne puisse plaire aux yeux.
D'un pinceau delicat l'artifice agréable
Du plus affreux objet fait un objet AIMABLE!
Ainsi pour nous CHARMER, la Tragédie en pleurs
D'Oedipe tout sanglant fit parler les douleurs."
Boileau, Art Poet.
This is pushing Aristotle's principle, of the pleasure we receive from the imitation even of disagreeable objects, rather farther than, I believe, he thought of. 2 A critic of much more taste and much less prejudice, speaking of the Philoctetes of Sophocles, has observed,
"that the antients thought bodily pains and wounds, &c. (
περιωδυνίαι και τρωσεις
) proper objects to be repre- sented on the stage. See also the Trachiniæ of Sophocles, and the lamentations of Hercules in it."
Dr. Warton's Essay on Pope, vol. i. 73, Note.
3 Hippolytus, after having been dragged over the rocks, and almost torn to pieces, by his fiery coursers, appears upon the stage with his mangled and bleeding limbs. 4 —But, according to Boileau, Dacier, &c. these are all "objets aimables."

Commentarius in Aristotelis Poeticam (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) (Ritter's Latin commentary, extracted from the 1839 volume, divided by Ritter's chapters and sections, and linked to the corresponding Perseus reference subsections.) focus

6. mvp-aristotle-comment-83

Ritter, cap. 11 § 6

δύο μὲν οὖν τοῦ μύθου μέρη περὶ ταῦτ᾽ ἐστί, περιπέτεια καὶ ἀναγνώρισις, τρίτον δὲ πάθος: iam in loca duo admodum spinosa incurrimus (dico hanc §. 6 et totum c. 12), quae si ab Aristotele sunt, ille qui adhuc de poesi optima quaeque docuit, idem falsissima et inutilia puerili explicatione protulit, sed veniamus ad singula. duae fabulae partes circa haec sunt, tertia autem perpessio. quid hoc ? num vere peripetia et agnitio fabulae ( τοῦ μύθου) partes esse possunt, cum modo expositum sit peripetiam et agnitionem uni fabulae implexae competere, iisque ipsis differre a simplice implexam? dicat quispiam, at Aristoteles τὸν μύθον dixit eam fabulam de qua proxime disputavit, h. e. implexam. si id vel invita lingua concederemus, quid inde sequetur? scilicet τὸ πάθος esse uniusimplexae fabulae partem, quod falsissimum est, sed vide quaeso quomodo novum illud prioribus adiungatur, τρίτον δὲ πάθος. id ita explicari potest, ut hoc tertium περὶ ταῦτ᾽ εἶναι dicatur (eo verba ducunt), aut ut idem pro tertia mythi parte venditetur. si prius admittis, absurdum est dicere πάθος circa id versari circa quod agnitio et peripetia, si alterum, non minus falsum est docere tres fabulae partes esse peripetiam agnitionem perpessionem, cum duae priores a multis fabulis plane abesse possint, perpessio autem ne pro parte quidem fabulae haberi possit. considera quae sequuntur, τούτων δὲ περιπέτεια μὲν καὶ ἀναγνώρισις εἴρηται: scribere debuit τούτων δὲ περιπέτεια μὲν καὶ ἀναγνώρισις τί ἐστι, εἴρηται vel τούτων δὲ περὶ περιπετείας μὲν καὶ ἀναγνωρί σεως εἴρηται. hoc, περιπέτεια εἴρηται, nihil est nisi peripetiae nomen ante positum est. denique haec πάθους definitio utique caret omni philosophi sagacitate et accuratione elocutionis. restat aliud indicium quo haec admodum suspecta fiant, idque mox afferre placet. accedimus enim ad alterum illum locum Aristotelis gravitate et nomine non minus indignum.