Search the Perseus Catalog for:

View: By Part

← Previous Next →

or Poems in Iambic, Elegiac, or other metres, in which the Epic species of imitation may be conveyed.

Poetics. Aristotle. Thomas Twining (Translator). London, UK. 1789.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Experimental

Poetics (Thomas Twining, 1789) (OCR draft) (English) (Thomas Twining's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1789 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (5)

Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) (Aristotle, Poetics. Immanuel Bekker, editor, Aristotelis Opera, volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1837.) — 1 focus

Περὶ ποιητικῆς αὐτῆς τε καὶ τῶν εἰδῶν αὐτῆς, ἥν τινα δύναμιν ἕκαστον ἔχει, καὶ πῶς δεῖ συνίστασθαι τοὺς μύθους, εἰ μέλλει καλῶς ἕξειν ἡ ποίησις, ἔτι δὲ ἐκ πόσων καὶ ποίων ἐστὶ μορίων, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὅσα τῆς αὐτῆς ἐστὶ μεθόδου, λέγωμεν, ἀρξάμενοι κατὰ φύσιν πρῶτον ἀπὸ τῶν πρώτων.

Ἐποποιία δὴ καὶ ἡ τῆς τραγῳδίας ποίησις, ἔτι δὲ κωμῳδία καὶ ἡ διθυραμβοποιητικὴ καὶ τῆς αὐλητικῆς ἡ πλείστη καὶ κιθαριστικῆς, πᾶσαι τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι μιμήσεις τὸ σύνολον.

Διαφέρουσι δὲ ἀλλήλων τρισίν· ἢ γὰρ τῷ γένει ἑτέροις μιμεῖσθαι, ἢ τῷ ἕτερα, ἢ τῷ ἑτέρως καὶ μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν τρόπον.

Ὥσπερ γὰρ καὶ χρώμασι καὶ σχήμασι πολλὰ μιμοῦνταί τινες ἀπεικάζοντες, οἱ μὲν διὰ τέχνης οἱ δὲ διὰ συνηθείας, ἕτεροι δὲ διὰ τῆς φωνῆς, οὕτω κἀν ταῖς εἰρημέναις τέχναις, ἅπασαι μὲν ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν ἐν ῥυθμῷ καὶ λόγῳ καὶ ἁρμονίᾳ, τούτοις δ᾿ ἢ χωρὶς ἢ μεμιγμένοις,

οἷον ἁρμονίᾳ μὲν καὶ ῥυθμῷ χρώμεναι μόνον ἥ τε αὐλητικὴ καὶ ἡ κιθαριστική, κἂν εἴ τινες ἕτεραι τυγχάνωσιν οὖσαι τοιαῦται τὴν δύναμιν, οἷον ἡ τῶν συρίγγων.

Αὐτῷ δὲ τῷ ῥυθμῷ μιμοῦνται χωρὶς ἁρμονίας οἱ τῶν ὀρχηστῶν· καὶ γὰρ οὗτοι διὰ τῶν σχηματιζομένων ῥυθμῶν μιμοῦνται καὶ ἤθη καὶ πάθη καὶ πράξεις.

Ἡ δὲ ἐποποιία μόνον τοῖς λόγοις ψιλοῖς ἢ τοῖς μέτροις, καὶ τούτοις εἴτε μιγνῦσα μετ᾿ ἀλλήλων, εἴθ᾿ ἑνί τινι γένει χρωμένη τῶν μέτρων τυγχάνουσα μέχρι τοῦ νῦν.

Οὐδὲν γὰρ ἂν ἔχοιμεν ὀνομάσαι κοινὸν τοὺς Σώφρονος καὶ Ξενάρχου μίμους καὶ τοὺς Σωκρατικοὺς λόγους,

οὐδὲ εἴ τις διὰ τριμέτρων ἢ ἐλεγείων ἢ τῶν ἄλλων τινῶν τῶν τοιούτων ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν·

πλὴν οἱ ἄνθρωποί γε συνάπτοντες τῷ μέτρῳ τὸ ποιεῖν ἐλεγειοποιοὺς τοὺς δὲ ἐποποιοὺς ὀνομάζουσιν, οὐχ ὡς τοὺς κατὰ μίμησιν ποιητὰς ἀλλὰ κοινῇ κατὰ τὸ μέτρον προσαγορεύοντες.

Καὶ γὰρ ἂν ἰατρικὸν ἢ μουσικόν τι διὰ τῶν μέτρων ἐκφέρωσιν, οὕτω καλεῖν εἰώθασιν. Οὐδὲν δὲ κοινόν ἐστιν Ὁμήρῳ καὶ Ἐμπεδοκλεῖ πλὴν τὸ μέτρον· διὸ τὸν μὲν ποιητὴν δίκαιον καλεῖν, τὸν δὲ φυσιολόγου μᾶλλον ἢ ποιητήν.

Ὁμοίως δὲ κἂν εἴ τις ἅπαντα τὰ μέτρα μιγνύων ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν, καθάπερ Χαιρήμων ἐποίησε Κένταυρον μικτὴν ῥαψῳδίαν ἐξ ἁπάντων τῶν μέτρων, οὐκ ἤδη καὶ ποιητὴν προσαγορευτέον. Περὶ μὲν οὖν τούτων διωρίσθω τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον.

Εἰσὶ δέ τινες οἳ πάσι χρῶνται τοῖς εἰρημένοις, λέγω δὲ οἷον ῥυθμῷ καὶ μέλει καὶ μέτρῳ, ὥσπερ ἥ τε τῶν διθυραμβικῶν ποίησις καὶ ἡ τῶν νόμων καὶ ἥ τε τραγῳδία καὶ ἡ κωμῳδία· διαφέρουσι δέ, ὅτι αἱ μὲν ἅμα πᾶσιν αἱ δὲ κατὰ μέρος.

Ταύτας μὲν οὖν λέγω τὰς διαφορὰς τῶν τεχνῶν, ἐν οἷς ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν.

Περὶ ποιητικῆς (OCR draft) Perseus (Aristotle, De arte poetica liber. Rudolf Kassel, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. Reference edition for passage alignment.) — 1 focus

1447a 8 περὶ ποιητικῆς αὐτῆς τε καὶ τῶν εἰδῶν αὐτῆς, ἥν τινα δύναμιν ἕκαστον ἔχει, καὶ πῶς δεῖ συνίστασθαι τοὺς μύθους 10 εἰ μέλλει καλῶς ἕξειν ἡ ποίησις, ἔτι δὲ ἐκ πόσων καὶ ποίων ἐστὶ μορίων, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὅσα τῆς αὐτῆς ἐστι μεθόδου, λέγωμεν ἀρξάμενοι κατὰ φύσιν πρῶτον ἀπὸ τῶν πρώτων.

ἐποποιία δὴ καὶ ἡ τῆς τραγῳδίας ποίησις ἔτι δὲ κωμῳδία καὶ ἡ διθυραμβοποιητικὴ καὶ τῆς 15 αὐλητικῆς ἡ πλείστη καὶ κιθαριστικῆς πᾶσαι τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι μιμήσεις τὸ σύνολον·

διαφέρουσι δὲ ἀλλήλων τρισίν, ἢ γὰρ τῷ ἐν ἑτέροις μιμεῖσθαι ἢ τῷ ἕτερα ἢ τῷ ἑτέρως καὶ μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν τρόπον.

ὥσπερ γὰρ καὶ χρώμασι καὶ σχήμασι πολλὰ μιμοῦνταί τινες ἀπεικάζοντες (οἱ μὲν 20 διὰ τέχνης οἱ δὲ διὰ συνηθείας), ἕτεροι δὲ διὰ τῆς φωνῆς, οὕτω κἀν ταῖς εἰρημέναις τέχναις ἅπασαι μὲν ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν ἐν ῥυθμῷ καὶ λόγῳ καὶ ἁρμονίᾳ, τούτοις δ’ ἢ χωρὶς ἢ μεμιγμένοις·

οἷον ἁρμονίᾳ μὲν καὶ ῥυθμῷ χρώμεναι μόνον ἥ τε αὐλητικὴ καὶ ἡ κιθαριστικὴ κἂν εἴ τινες 25 ἕτεραι τυγχάνωσιν οὖσαι τοιαῦται τὴν δύναμιν, οἷον ἡ τῶν συρίγγων,

αὐτῷ δὲ τῷ ῥυθμῷ μιμοῦνται χωρὶς ἁρμονίας ἡ τῶν ὀρχηστῶν (καὶ γὰρ οὗτοι διὰ τῶν σχηματιζομένων ῥυθμῶν μιμοῦνται καὶ ἤθη καὶ πάθη καὶ πράξεις)·

ἡ δὲ ἐποποιία μόνον τοῖς λόγοις ψιλοῖς καὶ ἡ τοῖς μέτροις καὶ τούτοις 1447b 8 εἴτε μιγνῦσα μετ’ ἀλλήλων εἴθ’ ἑνί τινι γένει χρωμένη τῶν μέτρων ἀνώνυμοι τυγχάνουσι μέχρι τοῦ νῦν·

οὐδὲν γὰρ ἂν 10 ἔχοιμεν ὀνομάσαι κοινὸν τοὺς Σώφρονος καὶ Ξενάρχου μίμους καὶ τοὺς Σωκρατικοὺς λόγους

οὐδὲ εἴ τις διὰ τριμέτρων ἢ ἐλεγείων ἢ τῶν ἄλλων τινῶν τῶν τοιούτων ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν.

πλὴν οἱ ἄνθρωποί γε συνάπτοντες τῷ μέτρῳ τὸ ποιεῖν ἐλεγειοποιοὺς τοὺς δὲ ἐποποιοὺς ὀνομάζουσιν, οὐχ ὡς 15 κατὰ τὴν μίμησιν ποιητὰς ἀλλὰ κοινῇ κατὰ τὸ μέτρον προσαγορεύοντες·

καὶ γὰρ ἂν ἰατρικὸν ἢ φυσικόν τι διὰ τῶν μέτρων ἐκφέρωσιν, οὕτω καλεῖν εἰώθασιν· οὐδὲν δὲ κοινόν ἐστιν Ὁμήρῳ καὶ Ἐμπεδοκλεῖ πλὴν τὸ μέτρον, διὸ τὸν μὲν ποιητὴν δίκαιον καλεῖν, τὸν δὲ φυσιολόγον μᾶλλον ἢ 20 ποιητήν·

ὁμοίως δὲ κἂν εἴ τις ἅπαντα τὰ μέτρα μιγνύων ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν καθάπερ Χαιρήμων ἐποίησε Κένταυρον μικτὴν ῥαψῳδίαν ἐξ ἁπάντων τῶν μέτρων, καὶ ποιητὴν προσαγορευτέον. περὶ μὲν οὖν τούτων διωρίσθω τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον.

εἰσὶ δέ τινες αἳ πᾶσι χρῶνται τοῖς 25 εἰρημένοις, λέγω δὲ οἷον ῥυθμῷ καὶ μέλει καὶ μέτρῳ, ὥσπερ ἥ τε τῶν διθυραμβικῶν ποίησις καὶ ἡ τῶν νόμων καὶ ἥ τε τραγῳδία καὶ ἡ κωμῳδία· διαφέρουσι δὲ ὅτι αἱ μὲν ἅμα πᾶσιν αἱ δὲ κατὰ μέρος.

ταύτας μὲν οὖν λέγω τὰς διαφορὰς τῶν τεχνῶν ἐν οἷς ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν.

Poetics, Greek text (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's Greek text of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 1 focus

Περὶ ποιητικῆς αὐτῆς τε καὶ τῶν εἰδῶν αὐτῆς, ἥν τινα
δύναμιν ἕκαστον ἔχει, καὶ πῶς δεῖ συνίστασθαι τοὺς μύθους
εἰ μέλλει καλῶς ἕξειν ἡ ποίησις, ἔτι δὲ ἐκ πόσων καὶ
ποίων ἐστὶ μορίων, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὅσα τῆς
αὐτῆς ἐστι μεθόδου, λέγωμεν ἀρξάμενοι κατὰ φύσιν πρῶτον
ἀπὸ τῶν πρώτων.

ἐποποιία δὴ καὶ ἡ τῆς τραγῳδίας
ποίησις ἔτι δὲ κωμῳδία καὶ ἡ διθυραμβοποιητικὴ καὶ τῆς
αὐλητικῆς ἡ πλείστη καὶ κιθαριστικῆς πᾶσαι τυγχάνουσιν
οὖσαι μιμήσεις τὸ σύνολον·

διαφέρουσι δὲ ἀλλήλων τρισίν,
ἢ γὰρ τῷ γένει ἑτέροις μιμεῖσθαι ἢ τῷ ἕτερα ἢ τῷ ἑτέρως
καὶ μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν τρόπον.

ὥσπερ γὰρ καὶ χρώμασι
καὶ σχήμασι πολλὰ μιμοῦνταί τινες ἀπεικάζοντες (οἱ μὲν
διὰ τέχνης οἱ δὲ διὰ συνηθείας), ἕτεροι δὲ διὰ τῆς φωνῆς,
οὕτω κἂν ταῖς εἰρημέναις τέχναις ἅπασαι μὲν ποιοῦνται
τὴν μίμησιν ἐν ῥυθμῷ καὶ λόγῳ καὶ ἁρμονίᾳ, τούτοις δ᾽
ἢ χωρὶς ἢ μεμιγμένοις·

οἷον ἁρμονίᾳ μὲν καὶ ῥυθμῷ χρώμεναι
μόνον ἥ τε αὐλητικὴ καὶ ἡ κιθαριστικὴ κἂν εἴ τινες
ἕτεραι τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι τοιαῦται τὴν δύναμιν, οἷον ἡ τῶν
συρίγγων·

αὐτῷ δὲ τῷ ῥυθμῷ μιμοῦνται χωρὶς ἁρμονίας αἱ
τῶν ὀρχηστῶν, καὶ γὰρ οὗτοι διὰ τῶν σχηματιζομένων ῥυθμῶν
μιμοῦνται καὶ ἤθη καὶ πάθη καὶ πράξεις.

ἡ δὲ ἐποποιία
μόνον τοῖς λόγοις ψιλοῖς ἢ τοῖς μέτροις καὶ τούτοις εἴτε
μιγνῦσα μετ᾿ ἀλλήλων εἴθ᾽ ἑνί τινι γένει χρωμένη τῶν μέτρων
ἀνώνυμος τυγχάνει οὖσα μέχρι τοῦ νῦν.

οὐδὲν γὰρ ἂν
ἔχοιμεν ὀνομάσαι κοινὸν τοὺς Σώφρονος καὶ Ξενάρχου μίμους
καὶ τοὺς Σωκρατικοὺς λόγους

οὐδὲ εἴ τις διὰ τριμέτρων
ἢ ἐλεγείων ἢ τῶν ἄλλων τινῶν τῶν τοιούτων ποιοῖτο τὴν
μίμησιν—

πλὴν οἱ ἄνθρωποί γε συνάπτοντες τῷ μέτρῳ τὸ
ποιεῖν ἐλεγειοποιοὺς τοὺς δὲ ἐποποιοὺς ὀνομάζουσιν, οὐχ ὡς
κατὰ τὴν μίμησιν ποιητὰς ἀλλὰ κοινῇ κατὰ τὸ μέτρον προσαγορεύοντες·

καὶ γὰρ ἂν ἰατρικὸν ἢ φυσικόν τι διὰ τῶν
μέτρων ἐκφέρωσιν, οὕτω καλεῖν εἰώθασιν· οὐδὲν δὲ κοινόν
ἐστιν Ὁμήρῳ καὶ Ἐμπεδοκλεῖ πλὴν τὸ μέτρον, διὸ τὸν μὲν
ποιητὴν δίκαιον καλεῖν, τὸν δὲ φυσιολόγον
μᾶλλον ἢ ποιητήν.

ὁμοίως δὲ κἂν εἴ τις ἅπαντα τὰ μέτρα μιγνύων
ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν καθάπερ Χαιρήμων ἐποίησε Κένταυρον
μικτὴν ῥαψῳδίαν ἐξ ἁπάντων τῶν μέτρων, καὶ ποιητὴν
προσαγορευτέον. περὶ μὲν οὖν τούτων διωρίσθω
τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον.

εἰσὶ δέ τινες αἳ πᾶσι χρῶνται τοῖς εἰρημένοις,
λέγω δὲ οἷον ῥυθμῷ καὶ μέλει καὶ μέτρῳ, ὥσπερ
ἥ τε τῶν διθυραμβικῶν ποίησις καὶ ἡ τῶν νόμων καὶ ἥ
τε τραγῳδία καὶ ἡ κωμῳδία· διαφέρουσι δὲ ὅτι αἱ μὲν
ἅμα πᾶσιν αἱ δὲ κατὰ μέρος.

ταύτας μὲν οὖν λέγω τὰς
διαφορὰς τῶν τεχνῶν ἐν οἷς ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν.

Poetics, Greek text (S. H. Butcher, 1911) (OCR draft) Experimental (S. H. Butcher's Greek text from Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art, fourth edition, 1911.) — 1 focus

[1] 1447a 8 Περὶ ποιητικῆς αὐτῆς τε καὶ τῶν εἰδῶν αὐτῆς, ἥν τινα δύναμιν ἕκαστον ἔχει, καὶ πῶς δεῖ συνίστασθαι τοὺς μύθους εἰ μέλλει καλῶς ἕξειν ἡ ποίησις, ἔτι δὲ ἐκ πόσων καὶ ποίων ἐστὶ μορίων, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὅσα τῆς αὐτῆς ἐστι μεθόδου, λέγωμεν λέγωμεν λέγομεν¹ ἀρξάμενοι κατὰ φύσιν πρῶτον ἀπὸ τῶν πρώτων.

[2] ἐποποιία δὴ καὶ ἡ τῆς τραγῳδίας ποίησις ἔτι δὲ κωμῳδία καὶ ἡ διθυραμβοποιητικὴ καὶ τῆς 15 αὐλητικῆς ἡ πλείστη καὶ κιθαριστικῆς πᾶαι τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι μιμήσεις τὸ σύνολον,

[3] διαφέρουσι δὲ ἀλλήλων τρισίν, ἢ γὰρ τῷ ἐν ἑτέροις ἐν ἑτέροις γένει² μιμεῖσθαι ἢ τῷ ἕτερα ἢ τῷ ἑτέρως καὶ μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν τρόπον.

[4] ὥσπερ γὰρ καὶ χρώμασι καὶ σχήμασι πολλὰ μιμοῦνταί τινες ἀπεικάζοντες (οἱ μὲν διὰ τέχνης οἱ δὲ διὰ συνηθείας), ἕτεροι δὲ διὰ τῆς φωνῆς τῆς φωνῆς τῆς φύσεως αὐτῆς τῆς φύσεως³, οὕτω κἀν κὰν καὶ ἐν καὶ ταῖς εἰρημέναις τέχναις· ἅπασαι μὲν ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν ἐν ῥυθμῷ καὶ λόγῳ καὶ ἁρμονίᾳ, τούτοις δ᾽ ἢ χωρὶς ἢ μεμιγμένοις· οἷον ἁρμονίᾳ μὲν καὶ ῥυθμῷ χρώμεναι μόνον ἥ τε αὐλητικὴ καὶ ἡ κιθαριστικὴ κἂν εἴ τινες ἕτεραι τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι τοιαῦται τὴν δύναμιν, οἷον ἡ τῶν συρίγγων.

[5] αὐτῷ δὲ τῷ ῥυθμῷ τῷ αὐτῷ δὲ⁴ [μιμοῦνται]⁵ χωρὶς ἁρμονίας ἡ⁶ τῶν ὀρχηστῶν, καὶ γὰρ οὗτοι διὰ τῶν σχηματιζομένων ῥυθμῶν μιμοῦνται καὶ ἤθη καὶ πάθη καὶ πράξεις.

[6] ἡ δὲ [ἐποποιία]⁷ μόνον τοῖς λόγοις ψιλοῖς ἢ τοῖς μέτροις καὶ τούτοις 1447b 8 εἴτε μιγνῦσα μετ’ ἀλλήλων εἴθ’ ἑνί τινι γένει χρωμένη τῶν μέτρων, ἀνώνυμος⁸ τυγχάνει οὖσα τυγχάνουσα μέχρι τοῦ νῦν.

Poetics, Greek text (Franz Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's 1839 Greek edition, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 1 focus

Περὶ ποιητικῆς αὐτῆς τε καὶ τῶν εἰδῶν αὐτῆς, ἣν τινα δύναμιν ἕκαστον ἔχει, καὶ πῶς δεῖ συνίστασθαι τοὺς μύθους, εἰ μέλλει καλῶς ἕξειν ἡ ποίησις, ἔτι δὲ ἐκ πόσων καὶ ποίων ἐστὶ μορίων, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ περὶ τῶν ἄλλων ὅσα τῆς αὐτῆς ἐστὶ μεθόδου, λέγωμεν, ἀρξάμενοι κατὰ φύσιν πρῶτον ἀπὸ τῶν πρώτων. ἡ

ἐποποιία δὴ καὶ ἡ τῆς τραγῳδίας ποίησις, ἔτι δὲ κωμῳδία καὶ ἡ διθυραμβοποιητική, καὶ τῆς αὐλητικῆς ἡ πλείστη καὶ κιθαριστικῆς, πᾶσαι τυγχάνουσιν οὖσαι μιμήσεις τὸ σύνολον.

διαφέρουσι δὲ ἀλλήλων τρισίν· ἢ γὰρ τῷ γένει ἑτέροις μιμεῖσθαι, ἢ τῷ ἕτερα, ἢ τῷ ἑτέρως καὶ μὴ τὸν αὐτὸν τρόπον.

ὥσπερ γὰρ καὶ χρώμασι καὶ σχήμασι πολλὰ μιμοῦνταί τινες ἀπεικάζοντες, οἱ μὲν διὰ τέχνης οἱ δὲ διὰ συνηθείας [, ἕτεροι δὲ διὰ τῆς φωνῆς], οὕτω κἀν ταῖς εἰρημέναις τέχναις, ἅπασαι μὲν ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν ἐν ῥυθμῷ καὶ λόγῳ καὶ ἁρμονίᾳ, τούτοις δ' ἢ χωρὶς ἢ μεμιγμένοις,

αὐτῷ δὲ τῷ ῥυθμῷ μιμοῦνται χωρὶς ἁρμονίας· οἱ τῶν ὀρχηστῶν· καὶ γὰρ οὗτοι διὰ τῶν σχηματιζομένων ῥυθμῶν μιμοῦνται καὶ ἤθη καὶ πάθη καὶ πράξεις.

ἡ δὲ ἐποποιία μόνον τοῖς λόγοις ψιλοῖς ἢ τοῖς μέτροις, καὶ τούτοις εἴτε μιγνῦσα μετ' ἀλλήλων, εἴθ' ἑνί τινι γένει χρωμένη τῶν μέτρων τυγχάνουσα μέχρι τοῦ νῦν.

οὐδὲν γὰρ ἂν ἔχοιμεν ὀνομάσαι κοινὸν τοὺς Σώφρονος καὶ Ξενάρχου μίμους καὶ τοὺς Σωκρατικοὺς λόγους,

οὐδὲ εἴ τις διὰ τριμέτρων ἢ ἐλεγείων ἢ τῶν ἄλλων τινῶν τῶν τοιούτων ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν·

καὶ γὰρ ἂν ἰατρικὸν ἢ μουσικόν τι διὰ τῶν μέτρων ἐκφέρωσιν, οὕτω¹ καλεῖν εἰώθασιν. οὐδὲν δὲ κοινόν ἐστιν Ὁμήρῳ καὶ Ἐμπεδοκλεῖ πλὴν τὸ μέτρον· διὸ τὸν μὲν ποιητὴν δίκαιον καλεῖν, τὸν δὲ φυσιολόγον μᾶλλον ἢ ποιητήν.

ὁμοίως δὲ κἂν εἴ τις ἅπαντα τὰ μέτρα μιγνύων ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν, καθάπερ Χαιρήμων ἐποίησε Κένταυρον μικτὴν ῥαψῳδίαν ἐξ ἁπάντων τῶν μέτρων, καὶ ποιητὴν προσαγορευτέον. περὶ μὲν οὖν τούτων διωρίσθω τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον.

εἰσὶ δέ τινες αἳ πᾶσι χρῶνται τοῖς εἰρημένοις, λέγω δὲ οἷον ῥυθμῷ καὶ μέλει καὶ μέτρῳ, ὥσπερ ἥ τε τῶν διθυραμβικῶν ποίησις καὶ ἡ τῶν νόμων καὶ ἥ τε τραγῳδία καὶ ἡ κωμῳδία· διαφέρουσι δέ, ὅτι αἱ μὲν ἅμα πᾶσιν αἱ δὲ κατὰ μέρος.

ταύτας μὲν οὖν λέγω τὰς διαφορὰς τῶν τεχνῶν, ἐν οἷς ποιοῦνται τὴν μίμησιν.

Translations (13)

Poetics (W. H. Fyfe) (OCR draft) Perseus (William Hamilton Fyfe's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, Loeb Classical Library, 1939 printing.) — 1 focus

1447a 8 Let¹ us here deal with Poetry, its essence and its several species, with the characteristic function of each species and the way in which plots must be constructed if the poem is to be a success; and also with the number and character of the constituent parts of a poem, and similarly with all other matters proper to this same inquiry; and let us, as nature directs, begin first with first principles.

Epic poetry, then, and the poetry of tragic drama, and, moreover, comedy and dithyrambic poetry, and most flute-playing and harp-playing, these, speaking generally, may all be said to be representations of life.²

But they differ one from another in three ways: either in using means generically different³ or in representing different objects or in representing objects not in the same way but in a different manner.

For just as by the use both of color and form people represent many objects, making likenesses of them— 20 some having a knowledge of art and some working empirically—and just as others use the human voice; so is it also in the arts which we have mentioned, they all make their representations in rhythm and language and tune, using these means either separately or in combination.

For tune and rhythm alone are employed in flute-playing and harp-playing and in any other arts which have a similar function, as, for example, pipe-playing.

Rhythm alone without tune is employed by dancers in their representations, for by means of rhythmical gestures they represent both character and experiences and actions.⁴

But the art which employs words either in bare prose or in metres, 1447b 1 either in one kind of metre or combining several, happens up to the present day to have no name.

For we can find no common term to apply to the mimes of Sophron and Xenarchus⁵ and to the Socratic dialogues:

nor again supposing a poet were to make his representation in iambics or elegiacs or any other such metre—

except that people attach the word poet(maker)to the name of the metre and speak of elegiac poets and of others as epic poets. Thus they do not call them poets in virtue of their representation but apply the name indiscriminately in virtue of the metre.

For if people publish medical or scientific treatises in metre the custom is to call them poets. But Homer and Empedocles⁶ have nothing in common except the metre, so that it would be proper to call the one a poet and the other not a poet but a scientist.

20 Similarly if a man makes his representation by combining all the metres, as Chaeremon did when he wrote his rhapsody The Centaur, a medley of all the metres, he too should be given the name of poet.⁷ On this point the distinctions thus made may suffice.

There are certain arts which employ all the means which I have mentioned, such as rhythm and tune and metre—dithyrambic and nomic poetry,⁸ for example, and tragedy too and comedy. The difference here is that some use all these at once, others use now one now another.

These differences then in the various arts I call the means of representation.

Arabic Poetics (Badawī edition, 1953) (OCR draft) (The ancient Arabic translation of Aristotle's Poetics in ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī's 1953 edition.) — 1 focus

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

كتاب أرسطوطالس فى الشعراء نقل أبى بشر متى بن يونس القنائى من السريانى إلى العربى

قال أرسطوطالس:

〈موضوع صناعة الشعر؛ الشعر والمحاكاة ووسائل المحاكاة〉

إنا متكلمون الآن فى صناعة الشعراء وأنواعها، ومخبرون أى قوة لكل واحد منها، وعلى أى سبيل ينبغى أن تتقوم الأسمار والأشعار، إن كانت الفواسيس مزمعة بأن يجرى أمرها مجرى الجودة؛ وأيضاً من كم جزء هى، وأيما هى أجزاؤها؛ وكذلك نتكلم من أجل كم التى هى موجودة التى هى لها بعينها. و[نتكلم و]نحن متكلمون فى هذا كله من حيث نبتدئ أولا من الأشياء الأوائل.

فكل شعر، وكل نشيد شعرى ينحى به: إما مديحاً، وإما هجاء، 〈و〉إما ديثرمبو الشعرى، ونحو أكثر أوليطيقس، وكل ما كان داخلا فى التشبيه ومحاكاة صناعة الملاهى من الزمر والعود وغيره. وأصنافها ثلاثة: وذلك إما أن يكون يشبه بأشياء أخر والحكاية بها، وإما أن تكون على عكس هذا: وهو أن تكون أشياء أخر تشبه وتحاكى، وإما أن تجرى على أحوال مختلفة لا على جهة واحدة بعينها.

وكما أن الناس قد يشبهون بألوان وأشكال كثير〈ة〉 أو يحاكون ذلك من حيث أن بعضهم يشبه بالصناعات ويحاكيها، وبعضهم بالعادات، وقوم أخر منهم بالأصوات: كذلك الصناعات التى وضعنا [و]: جميعها تأتى بالتشبيه والحكاية باللحن والقول والنظم، وذلك يكون: إما على الانفراد، وإما على جهة الاختلاط. مثال ذلك: أوليطيقى وصناعة العيدان فانهما يستعملان اللحن و〈الـ〉ـتأليف فقط، وإن كان توجد صناعات أخر هى فى قوتها مثل هاتين: مثال ذلك صناعة الصفر تستعمل اللحن الواحد بعينه من غير تأليف، وصناعة أداة الرقص أيضاً، وذلك أن هاتين باللحون المتشكلة تشبه بالعادات وبالانفعالات أيضاً وبالأعمال أيضاً وتحاكيها.

أما بعضها فبالكلام المنثور الساذج أكثر، أو بالأوزان: وتحاكى هى هذه: إما وهى مخلطة، وإما بأن تستعمل جنساً واحداً، وبالأوزان التى هى بلا تسمية 〈إلى الآن〉. وذلك أنه ليس لنا أن نسمى بماذا تشارك حكايات وتشبهات شاعر〈مثل سـ〉ـوفرن وكسانرخس والأقاويل المنسوبة إلى سقراط. ولا أيضاً إن جعل الانسان تشبيهه وحكايته بالأوزان الثلاثية، أو هو هذه التى تقال لها ألغاز، أو شىء من هذه الأخر التى تجعل تشبيهه وحكايته لها على هذا النحو. غير أن الناس عندما يوصلون وزن صناعة الشعر يعملون الأوزان ويسمون بعضها: فن الغايا، وبعضها فن الأفى والتى لها أول وآخر؛ وليس كالتى يعملون الشعر التى هى بالحكاية والتشبيه، لكن التى يلقبونها المشتركة فى أوزانها.

وذلك إن عملوا شيئاً من أمور الطب أو أمور الطبيعة بالأوزان فهكذا قد جرت عادتهم بالتلقيب: وذلك أنه لا شىء يشتر كان فيه: أوميروس وأنفادقلس ما خلا الوزن. ولذلك أما ذاك فينبغى أن نلقبه شاعراً، وأما هذا فالمتكلم فى الطبيعيات أكثر من الشاعر. وكذلك إن كان الانسان يعمل الحكاية والتشبيه عندما يخلط جميع الأوزان، كما كان يعمل خاريمن، فانه كان يشبه قانطورس برقص الدستبند من جميع الأوزان: فقد يجب أن نلقبه شاعراً.

فمن قبل هذه كان حدد هذا الضرب. وقد يوجد قوم يستعملون جميع التى وصفت: مثال ذلك فى اللحن والصوت الحلو أو الأوزان، كصناعة الشعر الديثوردمبى والتى للناموس، والمديح أيضاً والهجاء. وتختلف بأن بعضها مع الكل معاً، وبعضها بالجزء.

فهذه أقول إنها أصناف الصنائع التى بها يعملون الحكاية والتشبيه.

Poetics (S. H. Butcher, 1911) (OCR draft) Experimental (S. H. Butcher's English translation from Aristotle's Theory of Poetry and Fine Art, fourth edition, 1911.) — 1 focus

I propose to treat of Poetry in itself and of its various
kinds, noting the essential quality of each; to inquire into
the structure of the plot as requisite to a good poem;
into the number and nature of the parts of which a
poem is composed; and similarly into whatever else falls
within the same inquiry. Following, then, the order of
nature, let us begin with the principles which come
first.

Epic poetry and Tragedy, Comedy also and Dithyrambic
poetry, and the music of the flute and of the lyre in
most of their forms, are all in their general conception
modes of imitation.

They differ, however, from one another in three respects,—the
medium, the objects, the manner or mode of imitation,
being in each case distinct.

For as there are persons who, by conscious art or mere
habit, imitate and represent various objects through the
medium of colour and form, or again by the voice; so in the
arts above mentioned, taken as a whole, the imitation is
produced by rhythm, language, or 'harmony,' either singly
or combined.

Thus in the music of the flute and of the lyre, 'harmony'
and rhythm alone are employed; also in other arts, such
as that of the shepherd's pipe, which are essentially
similar to these.

In dancing, rhythm alone is used without 'harmony';
for even dancing imitates character, emotion, and action,
by rhythmical movement.

There is another art which imitates by means of language
alone, and that either in prose or verse—which verse, again,
may either combine different metres or consist of but one
kind—but this has hitherto been without a name.

For there is no common term we could apply to the
mimes of Sophron and Xenarchus and the Socratic
dialogues on the one hand;

and, on the other, to poetic imitations in iambic, elegiac,
or any similar metre.

People do, indeed, add the word 'maker' or 'poet' to the
name of the metre, and speak of elegiac poets, or epic
(that is, hexameter) poets, as if it were not the imitation
that makes the poet, but the verse that entitles them all
indiscriminately to the name.

Even when a treatise on medicine or natural science is
brought out in verse, the name of poet is by custom given
to the author; and yet Homer and Empedocles have
nothing in common but the metre, so that it would be
right to call the one poet, the other physicist rather than
poet.

On the same principle, even if a writer in his poetic
imitation were to combine all metres, as Chaeremon did in
his Centaur, which is a medley composed of metres of all
kinds, we should bring him too under the general term
poet. So much then for these distinctions.

There are, again, some arts which employ all the means
above mentioned, namely, rhythm, tune, and metre. Such
are Dithyrambic and Nomic poetry, and also Tragedy and
Comedy; διαφέρουσι δὲ ὅτι αἱ μὲν ἅμα πᾶσιν αἱ δὲ κατὰ
μέρος.

Such, then, are the differences of the arts with respect
to the medium of imitation.

Aristotle on the Art of Poetry (Ingram Bywater, 1909) (OCR draft) Experimental (Ingram Bywater's English translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1909.) — 1 focus

Our subject being Poetry, I propose to speak not only of the
art in general but also of its species and their respective
capacities; of the structure of plot required for a good poem;
of the number and nature of the constituent parts of a poem;
and likewise of any other matters in the same line of inquiry.
Let us follow the natural order and begin with the primary
facts.

Epic poetry and Tragedy, as also Comedy,
Dithyrambic poetry, and most flute-playing and lyre-playing,
are all, viewed as a whole, modes of imitation.

But at the same time they differ from one another in three ways,
either by a difference of kind in their means, or by differences
in the objects, or in the manner of their imitations.

Just as form and colour are used as means by some,
who (whether by art or constant practice) imitate and portray
many things by their aid, and the voice is used by others;
so also in the above-mentioned group of arts, the means
with them as a whole are rhythm, language, and harmony
-used, however, either singly or in certain combinations.

A combination of rhythm and harmony alone is the means in
flute-playing and lyre-playing, and any other arts there may
be of the same description, e.g. imitative piping.

Rhythm
alone, without harmony, is the means in the dancer's imitations;
for even he, by the rhythms of his attitudes, may represent
men's characters, as well as what they do and suffer.

There is further an art which imitates by language
alone, without harmony, in prose or in verse, and if in verse,
either in some one or in a plurality of metres.
This form of imitation is to this day without a name.

We have no
common name for a mime of Sophron or Xenarchus and
a Socratic Conversation;

and we should still be without one
even if the imitation in the two instances were in trimeters
or elegiacs or some other kind of verse

-though it is the way
with people to tack on 'poet' to the name of a metre, and
talk of elegiac-poets and epic-poets, thinking that they call
them poets not by reason of the imitative nature of their
work, but indiscriminately by reason of the metre they write
in.

Even if a theory of medicine or physical philosophy be
put forth in a metrical form, it is usual to describe the writer
in this way; Homer and Empedocles, however, have really
nothing in common apart from their metre; so that, if the
one is to be called a poet, the other should be termed a
physicist rather than a poet.

We should be in the same
position also, if the imitation in these instances were in all
the metres, like the Centaur (a rhapsody in a medley of all
metres) of Chaeremon; and Chaeremon one has to recognize
as a poet. So much, then, as to these arts.

There are,
lastly, certain other arts, which combine all the means
enumerated, rhythm, melody, and verse, e.g. Dithyrambic
and Nomic poetry, Tragedy and Comedy; with this difference,
however, that the three kinds of means are in some of them
all employed together, and in others brought in separately,
one after the other.

These elements of difference in the
above arts I term the means of their imitation.

The Poetic of Aristotle (Henry James Pye, revised 1792) (OCR draft) Experimental (Henry James Pye's revised 1792 English translation, corrected against the 1788 first edition, aligned to the Kassel reference edition, and supplied with a selective apparatus of substantive 1788 readings.) — 1.9 focus

or even imitations that might be made in iambic, elegiac or any other verse of the same nature.

The Poetic of Aristotle (Theodore Alois Buckley) (OCR draft) Experimental (Theodore Alois Buckley's English translation, first published in 1850 and represented from the Henry G. Bohn 1857 printing; corrected against a second OCR and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 1.9 focus

or elegies, or certain other things of this kind;

Poetica Latine conversa (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) Experimental (Franz Ritter's Latin translation, corrected against OCR of the represented copy and aligned to the conventional Perseus chapter-and-subchapter sequence.) — 1 focus

De poetica et ipsa et formis ipsius, quam quaeque vim habeat, et quomodo deceat componi fabulas, si recte se habitura sit poesis, praeterea ex quot et quibus partibus constet, pariterque de ceteris quae eiusdem disciplinae sunt, dicamus, initio facto secundum naturam ab iis quae prima sunt.

epopoeia igitur et tragoediae poesis, praeterea comoedia et dithyrambopoetica, et auleticae maxima pars citharisticaeque, omnes sunt imitationes in universum.

differunt autem inter sese tribus: aut quod genere diversis imitantur, aut quod diversa, aut quod diverse neque eodem modo.

ut enim et coloribus et lineamentis sunt qui multa imitantur assimulando, alii per artem alii per consuetudinem [, alii autem per vocem], sic etiam in iis quas dixi artibus, cunctae faciunt imitationem numero et sermone et concentu, iisque aut singulis aut mixtis,

quemadmodum uno concentu numeroque utuntur et auletica et citharistica, et si quae sunt aliae eiusdem potestatis, ut quae fistulis canit.

solo autem numero imitantur sine concentu motus saltatorum: etenim hi quoque per figuratos numeros imitantur et mores et perturbationes et actiones.

epopoeia vero unis sermonibus nudis aut metris, atque his dum ea sive miscet inter sese, sive uno aliquo genere metrorum utitur usque ad hoc tempus.

non enim communi nomine comprehendere possemus Sophronis et Xenarchi mimos et Socraticos sermones,

neque si quis trimetris vel elegis vel aliis quibusdam eiusmodi faceret imitationem;

nisi quod homines copulantes cum metro facere alios elegifices alios epifices nominant, non tam qui secundum imitationem sunt poetas quam communiter secundum metrum appellantes.

etenim si medicum quoddam vel musicum per metra efferant, sic vocare consueverunt. nihil autem commune est Homero et Empedocli praeter metrum; quamobrem illum iustum est poetam vocare, hunc autem physiologum potius quam poetam.

similiter vero etiam si quis omnia metra miscens faceret imitationem, quemadmodum Chaeremo fecit Centaurum mixtam rhapsodiam ex omnibus metris, et is poeta dicendus erit.

atque de his hunc in modum expositum esto. sunt etiam artes quae omnibus utuntur iis quae dicta sunt, dico numero et concentu et metro, sicut dithyrambicorum poesis et nomorum et tragoedia comoediaque differunt autem, quod hae simul omnibus, illae per partes.

has igitur dico differentias artium, in quibus faciunt imitationem.

La poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) Experimental (André Dacier's French translation of Aristotle's Poetics, published in 1692.) — 1.9 focus

toutes les autres imitations qu'on pourroit faire ſoit en vers ïambes, ou en vers élegiaques, ou en quelque autre ſorte de vers.

Poetica d'Aristotile (Bernardo Segni, 1549) (OCR draft) Experimental (Bernardo Segni's 1549 Florentine Italian translation, aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 1 focus

ELLA Poetica, & di lei, & delle fue fpetie, qual fia dı ciaſcuna d'eſſe la forza; & qualmente debbino effe re conteffute le fauole da chi vuole, che la poeſia vi ſtia rettamente. Oltradiqueſto di quanti, & di qua li parti ella ſia compoſta; & ſimilmete di tutte l'altre coſe, che à queſta inſtitutione s'appartengono, dirò io conſeguentemente: incominciatomi ſecondo l'ordine naturale primieramente da quelle cose che ſono imprima dell'altre.¹

Il poema Heroico adunche detto Epopeia, & il Tragico; & inoltre quello della Commedia, & quello de' Ditirambi: & an chora la piu parte di quell'arti, che ſono intorno al fuono de' Flauti, & delle Citare. Tutte, dico, conuengono in queſto generale, ch'elle ſono imitationi.

Ma fon bene differenti infra di loro per tre conti, ò perche elle imitano con coſe diuerſe di ſpetie;ò perch'elle imitano coſe diuerſe : ò perch'elle imitano in modo diuerfo, & non in vn'medeſimo.

Perchè coſi come certi fono, che vanno imitando con li colori, et con le figure molte co ſe per renderle famiglianti; certi, dico, ſono che fanno queſto per via dell'arte : & certi per via della conſuetu dine. Et altri ſono, che imitano con la uoce. Parimente interuiene nell'arti raccontate diſopra, che tutte, cioè, fanno l'imitatione & col numero, & col parlare, & con l'armonia. Et con queſte coſe la fanno,ò diſpersè,ò infieme;

come auuiene nell' arte de' ſuoni de' Flauti, & delle Citare, ò s'alcune altre ſe ne ritrouano, che habbinola medefima forza: ſicome è nell' arte del fonare le Zampogne. Queſte, dico, tutte nel fare la loro imitatione vſano l'armonia, & il numero.

Et il numero diſpersè ſenza l'armonia vſa nell'imitatione tutta l'arte, che è intorno a' balli, ò a' falti. Concioſia che quiui per via di quei numeri meſsi in atto co' geſti vi ſi vada imi tando & i coſtumi, & le attioni, & gli affetti.

Ma l'Epo peia fa l'imitatione ſolamente con la proſa,ò col verſo; & col verſo, ò meſcolato di piu forti: ò con quello, che ſia d'una fola ſpetie. Et ciò è offeruato infino al prefente tempo.

Imperoche ſtando altrimenti neſſuna altra coſa ſarebbe, che noi poteſsimo dire effer comune infra i Mimi di Sofrone, & di Xenarco; & infra i ragionaméti di Socrate.

Nè anchora s'alcuno faceſſe l'imitatione co' verſi lambi,o con gli Elegi:ò con altri ſimili.

Eccetto che gli huomini, congiugnendo inſieme il poetare, & il verſo, hanno chiamato queſti Poeti di Elegie; & quegli Poeti di Eflametri; non hauendo in ciò riſpetto all'imitatione: ma dando generalmente il nome di Poeta ſecondo il riſpetto del verſo.

Conciofia che ſe talı Poeti hanno detto in verſi alcuna coſa appar tenente ò alla medicina, ò alla muſica; eſsi hanno vſato nondimanco con la ragion'detta di chiamargli Poeti. Mae'non è comune alcun'altra coſa infra Homero, & Empedocle eccetto il verſo. Onde l'uno ſi debbe ragio neuolmente chiamar Poeta; & l'altro piutoſto Filofofo naturale, che Poeta.

Et queſto ſimileauuiene doue anchora vno, meſcolate tutte le ſorti de' verſi, nondimanco non vi faceſſe l'imitatione: ficome fe Chieremone nel ſuo Caual centauro, che di tutte le forti de verſi vi fe vn' meſcuglio. Et non per ciò debbe effer chiamato Poeta. Di queſte coſe adunche baſti la deter mination'detta.

Sono anchora certe fpetie di poefie, che vſano nella loro imitatione tutte le coſe dette, cioè, il numero,l'harmonia, & il verſo; come è la poeſia de' Ditirambi,& quella delle leggi : & come è la Tragedia,& la Commedia.

Ma fono differenti in queſto, che certe di loro vſano inſieme tutte le coſe dette;et certe l'uſano diſpersè.

De poetica (Antonio Riccobono, 1587) (OCR draft) Experimental (Antonio Riccobono's Latin translation, first published in 1587; text represented from Immanuel Bekker's 1831 edition.) — 1 focus

De poetica et ipsa et formis ipsius, quam vim habeat unaquaeque, et quomodo oporteat componi fabulas, si habitura sit se recte poesis, praeterea vero ex quot et qualibus constet partibus, similiter autem et de aliis quae eiusdem methodi sunt, dicamus incipientes secundum naturain naturam primum a primis.

iam vero epopoeia et tragoediae poësis, praeterea comoedia et dithyrambopoëtica, et auleticae maxima pars et citharisticae, omnes sunt imitatio in universum.

differunt autem inter se tribus: aut enim quod genere diversis imitantur, aut quod diversa, aut quod diverso et non eodem modo.

ut enim et coloribus et figuris multa imitantur aliqui effigiem exprimentes, partim quidem per artem partim vero per consuetudinem, alii autem utrisque, sic in dictis artibus omnes faciunt imitationem in numero et oratione et harmonia, atque his separatim aut mixtis.

ut harmonia quidem et numero utuntur solum et auletica et citharistica, et si quae aliae sunt tales potestate, ut fistularum. ipso autem numero imitantur sine harmonia,

qui sunt inter saltatores: etenim isti per figuratos numeros imitantur et mores et perturbationes et actiones. epopoeia vero solum sermonibus nudis vel metris,

et his sive mixtis inter se sive uno aliquo genere utens metrorum, qualis fuit usque adhuc.

non enim rem communem possemus nominare Sophronis et Xenarchi mimos et Socratis sermones,

neque si quis per trimetra vel elegos vel alia quaedam talia conficeret imitationem;

nisi quod homines coniungentes cum metro ipsum fingere, alios quidem elegorum fictores alios vero epicorum fictores nominant, non secundum imitationem sed communiter secundum metrum appellantes poëtas.

etenim si medicinae aut musicae aliquid per metra proferunt, sic appellare consueverunt: nihil autem commune est Homero et Empedocli praeter metrum; quare illum quidem poëtam iustum est appellare, hunc vero physiologum magis quam poëtam.

similiter vero etiam si quis omnia metra miscens non faciat imitationem, quemadmodum Chaeremon fecit Centaurum, mixtam rhapsodiam ex omnibus metris, iam poëta non est appellandus. atque haec quidem hunc in modum explicata sint.

sunt autem aliquae quae omnibus utuntur iis quae dicta sunt, nempe numero et concentu et metro, sicut dithyrambicorum poësis et nomorum. praeterea tragoedia et comoedia. differunt vero, quod illae quidem simul omnibus, hae vero secundum partem.

atque has quidem dico differentias artium, in quibus faciunt imitationem.

De arte poetica liber (William of Moerbeke, ca. 1277) (OCR draft) Experimental (William of Moerbeke's medieval Latin translation, represented by the 1953 Aristoteles Latinus edition.) — 1 focus

De poetica ipsaque et speciebus ipsius, quam virtutem habet, et quomodo oportet constituere fabulas si debeat bene habere poesis, adhuc autem ex quot et qualibus est partibus, similiter autem et de aliis quecumque sunt eiusdem methodi, dicamus incipientes secundum naturam primo a primis. —

Epopoiia itaque et que tragodie poesis, adhuc autem komodia et que dithyrambopoetica et fystulative plurima et cytharistice, omnes existunt entes imitationes secundum totum;

differunt autem ab invicem tribus: aut enim per genere alteris imitari, aut per altera, aut per aliter et non eodem modo.

Sicut enim et coloribus et figuris multa imitantur quosdam assimilantes hii quidem per artem, hii autem per consuetudinem, alteri autem per vocem, sic et dictis artibus. Omnibus quidem faciunt imitationem in rythmo et sermone et armonia, hiis autem aut separatim aut mixtis:

puta armonia quidem et rythmo utentes solo fystulativaque et cytharistica et si que alie sint habentes talem potentiam, puta que tubarum;

ipso autem rythmo imitantur sine armonia qui saltatricum ; et enim isti per figuratos rythmos imitantur et mores et passiones et actiones.

Epopoiia autem solum sermonibus nudis aut metris, et hiis aut miscens cum invicem aut uno aliquo genere utens metrorum existens usque nunc.

Nichil enim habemus nominare commune Sofronis et Xenarchi mymos et Socraticos sermones

neque si quis per trimetra aut elegeia aut per alia aliqua talia faciat imitationem ;

nisi quod homines, copulantes metro le facere, elegeioficos, hos autem versificos nominant; non tamquam secundum imitationem poetas, sed communiter secundum metrum appellantes.

Et enim si medicinale aut musicum aliquid per metra efferant, sic vocare consueverunt; nichil autem commune est Homero et Empedocli preter metrum, propter quod hunc quidem poetam iustum vocare, hunc autem fysiologum magis quam poetam.

Similiter autem et si quis omnia metra miscens faciat imitationem, sicut Kherimon fecit Centaurum mixtam rapsodiam ex omnibus metris, et poetam appellandum. De hiis quidem igitur determinatum sit hoc modo. —

Sunt autem aliqui qui omnibus dictis utuntur, dico autem puta rythmo et melodia et metro, sicut que dithyrambicorum poesis et que nomorum (idest legum) et tragodiaque et komodia ; differunt autem quia hee quidem simul omnibus, hee autem secundum partem.

Has quidem igitur dico differentias artium in quibus faciunt imitationem.

Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition) (OCR draft) Experimental (The Arabic translation attributed to Abū Bishr Mattā, edited by Jaroslaus Tkatsch in 1928 and aligned to the Kassel reference passage sequence.) — 1 focus

‏انا متكلمون الان فى صناعة الشعرا وانواعها ومخبرون اى قوة لكل واحد واحد منها وعلى اى سبيل ينبغى ان تتقوم الاسمار والاشعار ان كانت الفواسس مزمعة بان يجرى امرها مجرى الجودة وايضا من كم جزو هى وايما هى اجزاوها وكذلك نتكلم من اجل كم التى هى موجودة التى هى لها بعينها ونتكلم ونحن متكلمون فى هذا كله من حيث نبتدى اولا من الاشيا الاوايل

‏فكل شعر وكل نشيد شعرى ننحا به اما مديحا واما هجاا اما دثيرمبو الشعرى ونحو اكثر اوليطيقس وكل ما كان داخلا فى التشبه ومحاكاة صناعة الملاهى من الزمر والعود وغيره

‏واصنافها ثلثة وذلك اما ان تكون تشبه باشيا اخر والحكاية بها واما ان تكون على عكس هذا وهو ان تكون اشيا اخر تشبه وتحاكى واما ان تجرى على احوال مختلفة لا على جهة واحدة بعينها

‏وكما ان الناس قد يشبهون بالوان واشكال كثيرا ويحاكون ذلك من حيث ان بعضهم يشبه بالصناعات ويحاكيها وبعضهم بالعادات وقوم اخر منهم بالاصوات كذلك الصناعات التى وصفنا وجميعها ياتى بالتشبه والحكاية باللحن والقول والنظم وذلك يكون اما على الانفراد واما على جهة الاختلاط

‏مثال ذلك اوليطيقى وصناعة العيدان فانهما تستعملان اللحن وتاليف فقط وان كان توجد صناعات اخر هى فى قوتها مثل هاتين مثل ذلك صناعة الصفر تستعمل اللحن الواحد بعينه من غير تاليف

‏وصناعة اداة الرقص ايضا وذلك ان هاتين باللحون المتشكلة تشبه بالعادات وبالانفعالات ايضا وبالاعمال ايضا وتحاكيها

‏اما بعضها فبالكلام المنثور السارح اكثر او بالاوزان وتحاكى هى هذه اما وهى مخلطة واما بان تستعمل جنسا واحدا وبالاوزان التى هى بلا تسمية الا الازمه

‏وذلك انه ليس لنا ان نسمى بماذا يشارك حكايات وتشبيهات شاعر وقرن وكسانرخس والاقاويل المنسوبة الى سقراط

‏ولا ايضا ان جعل الانسان تشبيهه وحكايته بالاوزان الثلاثيه او هى هذه التى يقال لها الغاز او شى من هذه الاخر التى يجعل تشبيهه وحكايته لها على هذا النحو

‏غير ان الناس عند ما يوصلون وزن صناعة الشعر [يعملون الاوزان و]يسمون بعضها فمن الغايا وبعضها فى الاخر [والتى لها اول واخر] وليس كالتى يعملون الشعر التى هى بالحكاية والتشبيه لكن التى يلقبونها المشتركة فى اوزانها

‏وذلك ان عملوا شى من امور الطب او امور الطبيعة بالاوزان فهكذى قد جرت عادتهم بالتقليب وذلك انه لا شى يشتركان فيه اوميروس وانفادقلس ما خلا الوزن ولذلك اما ذاك فينبغى ان نلقبه شاعرا واما هذا فالمتكلم فى الطبيعيات اكثر من الشاعر

‏وكذلك ان كان الانسان يعمل الحكاية والتشبيه عند ما يخلط جميع الاوزان كما كان يعمل خاريمن فانه كن يشبه قانطورس برقص الدستبند من جميع الاوزان فقد يجب ان نلقبه شاعرا فمن قبل هذه كان حدد هذا الضرب

‏وقد يوجد قوم يستعملون جميع التى وصفت مثال ذلك فى اللحن والصوت الحلوا والاوزان كصناعة الشعر التى ٮٮورمٮى والتى للناصوس والمديح ايضا والهجا ويختلف بان بعضها مع الكل معا وبعضها بالجزو

‏فهذه اقول انها اصناف الصنايع التى بها يعملون

Arabic Poetics (Abū Bishr Mattā; Tkatsch edition, unaligned) (OCR draft) Experimental (Tkatsch's edition of the medieval Arabic translation in its original, unaligned segmentation.) — 1 focus

‏وذلك انه ليس لنا ان نسمى بماذا يشارك حكايات وتشبيهات شاعر وقرن وكسانرخس والاقاويل المنسوبة الى سقراط

‏وذلك ان عملوا شى من امور الطب او امور الطبيعة بالاوزان فهكذى قد جرت عادتهم بالتقليب

‏وذلك انه لا شى يشتركان فيه اوميروس وانفادقلس ما خلا الوزن ولذلك اما ذاك فينبغى ان نلقبه شاعرا واما هذا فالمتكلم فى الطبيعيات اكثر من الشاعر

‏وكذلك ان كان الانسان يعمل الحكاية والتشبيه عند ما يخلط جميع الاوزان كما كان يعمل خاريمن فانه كن يشبه قانطورس برقص الدستبند من جميع الاوزان فقد يجب ان نلقبه شاعرا

‏فمن قبل هذه كان حدد هذا الضرب

‏وقد يوجد قوم يستعملون جميع التى وصفت مثال ذلك فى اللحن والصوت الحلوا والاوزان كصناعة الشعر التى ٮٮورمٮى والتى للناصوس والمديح ايضا والهجا

‏ويختلف بان بعضها مع الكل معا وبعضها بالجزو فهذه اقول انها اصناف الصنايع التى بها يعملون

Commentary

Remarques sur la poëtique d'Aristote (André Dacier, 1692) (OCR draft) (André Dacier's French commentary on Aristotle's Poetics.) focus

29. mvp-aristotle-comment-29

1.9 En vers ïambes ou en vers Elegiaques, ou en quelque autre forte de vers.¹

Commentarius in Aristotelis Poeticam (Franciscus Ritter, 1839) (OCR draft) (Ritter's Latin commentary, extracted from the 1839 volume, divided by Ritter's chapters and sections, and linked to the corresponding Perseus reference subsections.) focus

7. mvp-aristotle-comment-7

Ritter, cap. 1 § 7

οὐδὲν γὰρ ἂν ἔχοιμεν κτλ. excusatur nova ἐποποιίας significatio huic nomini modo concessa: non enim communi nomine comprehendere possemus Sophronis Xenarchique mimos et Socraticos sermones, omnemque imitationem quae peragitur iis poesis generibus quibus neque concentus neque saltatio adiuncta est. concentu et saltatione caret poesis elegiaca et iambica, ac propterea hae species commemorantur illis εἴ τις διὰ τριμέτρων ἢ ἐλεγείων ποιοῖτο τὴν μίμησιν. enuntiatio condicionalis mente supplenda talis fuerit, nisi hoc nomen ( ἐποποιία) novo intellectu ponere- De Sophrone Euripidis aequali mimisque ab ipso filioque Xenarcho Dorica Siculorum dialecto scriptis cum diligentissime a Valckenario ad Theocriti Adoniazusas p. 188 sqq. expositum sit, ego de eodem argumento pauca quaedam, mus.quae ad hunc Aristotelis locum recte intelligendum et a vanis dubitationibus vindicandum faciant, libasse contentus ero. mimi illi morum notationes fuere ac descriptiones hominum quos offert vita vulgaris magna cum accuratione expressae. prosa oratione compositos fuisse non solum Suidas (s. v. Σώφρων) atque cius pedisequa Eudocia testatur, sed idem liquet ex hoc quem tractamus loco ac praecipue ex alio, quem Athenaeus ex Aristotelis περὶ Ποιητῶν opere nobis perdito protulit XI. ρ. 505 C. οὐκοῦν οὐδὲ 3) ἐμμέτρους τοὺς καλουμένους Σώφρονος μίμους μὴ φῶμεν εἶναι λόγους καὶ μιμήσεις ἢ τοὺς ᾿Αλεξαμενοῦ τοῦ Τηΐου τοὺς πρώτους γραφέντας τῶν Σωκρατικῶν διαλόγων, h. e. itaque ne metricos quidem (qui ne numeris quidem adstricti sunt) Sophronis quos vocant mimos, eos ne dicamus esse sermones et imitationes (sermones imitativos), vel quos Alexamenus Teius primus scripsit Socraticos dialogos. Aristoteles hisce verbis falsam quandam aliorum sententiam coarguit: ipse enim non negaturus erat Sophronis mimos esse λόγους καὶ μιμήσεις, h. e. λόγους μιμητικούς. mirum Tyrwhitti errorem (ille Sophronem metris usum esse sibi Buhlioque persuasit) Hermannus confutavit, idemque apte monuit, ne hunc Xenarchum Sophronis Syracusii filium confundamus cum Xenarcho Attico mediae comoediae poeta, de quo nostra memoria breviter disputavit vir egregie doctus, Meinekius in Quaestionum scen. specim. III. p. 61. Socraticos sermones ( Σωκρ. λόγους) eos esse quos primus Alexamenus Teius Socratis disputandi morem secutus edidit, post Tyrwhittum credidit Hermannus : sed nihil est causae cur hic obscurum illum scriptorem potius quam illustrissimum imitationis exemplar, Platonem dico, in primis significari credamus, quamquam neque Alexamenus excluditur nec si quis alius Socraticos sermones ita conscripsit ut simul τὸ μιμητικὸν consectaretur. prope abest a vero Augustus Matthiae in diurnis Ienens. a. 1805. n. 223. 3) Οὐδὲ hoc loco est ne quidem, ut in Poetica c. 8 extr. οὐδὲ μόριον τοῦ ὅλου ἐστίν. πλὴν οἱ ἄνθρωποί γε κτλ, communem loquendi usum in nomine ἐποποιίας recedere a suo concedens ab illo metrum spectari monet, non rei veritatem. ἐλεγειοποιούς τοὺς δὲ ἐποποιοὺς ὀνομάζουσιν : haec nomina composita ita accepit quam si posuisset ἐλεγείων (distichorum) ποιητὰς atque ἐπῶν (hexametrorum) ποιητάς 4). per ἐλεγεῖα et ἔπη quamvis et versuum species et ipsa carmina significentur, hoc tamen loco nonnisi prior significatio obtinet. de hac ἐλεγείων potestate cum nemo dubitare possit, propter alterum illud nomen ( έπη) satis sit provocasse ad Rhetorica III, 16. p. 1417 a 14. παράδειγμα ὁ ᾿Αλκίνου ἀπόλογος, ὅτι πρὸς τὴν Πηνελόπην ἐν ἑξήκοντα ἔπεσι (sexaginta hexametris) πεποίηται. conf. Pseudo - Aristoteles in Poetica ε. 26, 5. εἴ τις τὸν Οἰδίπουν θείη τὸν Σοφοκλέους ἐν ἔπεσιν ὅσοις ἡ Ἰλιάς. Sine iusta causa editores fere omnes (non Bekkerus) codicibus adversantibus legunt τοὺς μὲν ἐλεγειοποιοὺς τοὺς δὲ ἐποποιοὺς ὀν.,. ut sententia evadat haec, poetarum genus unis verbis imitantium aut ἐλεγειοποιούς aut ἐποποιοὺς vocari: sed id non verum est, cum etiam ἰαμβοποιοὶ nonnisi verbis imitentur. itaque ex pluribus nominibus duo ponuntur. οὐχ ὡς τοὺς κατὰ μίμησιν ποιητάς-προσα χορεύοντες: Tyrwhitto iudice articulus τοὺς elegantius abesset, sed is elegantiae loci neque addere quidquam potest neque detrahere. Hermannus scripsit οὐχ ὡς κατὰ τὴν μίμησιν π., aliis alia excogitantibus. nimirum vulgo interpretantur poetas non tam propter imitationem sed communiter propter metrum appellantes. ac sane articulus expungendus foret, si ea esset loci sententia. sed quod codices offerunt, bonam id sententiam facilemque structuram praebet, dummodo intelligamus τοὺς pertinere quidem ad ποιητάς, sed 4) Simile illud est in c. 4, 10. οἱ μὲν ἀντὶ τῶν ἰάμβων κωμωδοποιοὶ (h. e. κωμῳδιῶν ποιηταί) ἐγένοντο, κτλ. conf. quae monita sunt ad illum locum.hoc ipsum nomen tamquam bis positum accipiendum esse, ut plenius scripserit Aristoteles οὐχ ὡς τοὺς κατὰ μίμησιν ποιητὰς “ ποιητὰς” προσαγορεύοντες. secundum imitationem poetae ( οἱ κατὰ μίμησιν ποιηταί') illi sunt qui suo iure poetae nomine ornantur sive qui re vera poetae sunt, homines igitur non eos qui imitantur secundum id ipsum poetas appellant, sed qui eodem metro utuntur, eos communi nomine vocare solent,

Aristotle Poetics 1.9

Thomas Twining (Translator)

Search the Perseus Catalog for:

Current edition Experimental

Commentary

Ritter, cap. 1 § 7

Stable identifiers