ἅτε αὐτὸς κτλ.
: ‘being himself a monarch with sole sway will not only lead the man in whom he dwells as in a city unto every form of daring’ etc.
τε is used
ἀνακολούθως: see on II 373 B. The words
ἅτε αὐτὸς ὢν μόναρχος suggest as the proper supplement of the
τε clause something like ‘but will also make
him a tyrant too’; and the sentiment appears in a somewhat different form in 575 C, D (where see notes). So Hoefer (
de part. Pl. p. 14) correctly explains the passage. Schneider understands
κυβερνῶν or the like (to balance
ὤν) after
πόλιν—an impossible solution, which he himself abandoned afterwards in his translation. Others cancel
τε (
q and Stallbaum), or suggest
ἔχοντά τε καὶ τρέφοντα (Richards). Neither proposal is either necessary or probable. The words
ὥσπερ πόλιν have also caused difficulty; and Vind. E offers the ingenious emendation
πώλον (
sic). Should
ὥσπερ πόλιν be connected with
τὸν ἔχοντά τε αὐτόν or with
ἄξει? The latter view has hitherto, I believe, been held; but the introduction of the parallel is very awkward, and, in point of fact, neither
Ἔρως nor even the tyrant himself was said in Book VIII to lead the city into daring deeds (VIII 566 D ff., quoted by Stallbaum, is nothing to the point). On the other view
ὥσπερ πόλιν is natural and easy: if
ὁ ἔρως is a
μόναρχος, ὁ ἔχων τὸν ἔρωτα is the
πόλις where he rules. Cf.
ἕως ἂν ἐν αὐτοῖς ὥσπερ ἐν πόλει πολιτείαν καταστήσωμεν 590 E.
ὑπὸ τῶν ‐‐ ἑαυτοῦ
has been called ‘nonsense’ by Richards, who conjectures for
καὶ ἑαυτοῦ either
ἑαυτῷ, or
καὶ αὐτόν: Herwerden contents himself with deleting
καί. The text is assuredly sound; and although Stallbaum is here at fault, Vermehren correctly explained the passage as long ago as 1870 (
Pl. Stud. pp. 112 ff.).
καί is
quoque, and we should translate ‘by means of the same dispositions in himself also’ (“durch dieselben Eigenschaften auch seiner selbst” Vermehren).
τῶν αὐτῶν sc. as those of his evil associates. The history of the State furnishes an exact parallel in the contrast between the
foreign mercenaries and the emancipated slaves (VIII 567 D, E). Jowett's translation is right, but in his edition he still takes
καί as ‘and.’
κλέπτουσι κτλ.
recalls I 344 B (where see note) and 348 D. From
Xen.
Mem. I 2. 62
and
Symp. 4. 36 it would seem that these crimes were commonly cited as instances of
ἀδικία in the Socratic school. Cf. also
Ar.
Thesm. 817
ff.
ἐὰν ‐‐ τοιοῦτοι
is bracketed by Herwerden. The words are certainly difficult, if
σμικρά γε κακά be taken as ironical, for we have no right to render
ἐάν by ‘even if’: “a small catalogue of evils—(even) if there are only a few such men!” J. and C. But there is no irony. The meaning is ‘True, they
are small evils, if such men are few in number.’ ‘Yes,’ said I, ‘for small is small in comparison with great.’ Adimantus'
caveat prepares us for
ὅταν γὰρ δὴ πολλοὶ κτλ. below.
πονηρίᾳ
: ‘in respect of a city's wretchedness and misery.’ For the datives cf. VI 509 D (
σαφηνείᾳ καὶ ἀσαφείᾳ), VIII 555 A and infra 576 C. Its union with
ἀθλιότητι seems to shew that
πονηρία is here ‘wretchedness’ rather than ‘vice,’ although the Greeks did not clearly separate the two ideas (see on I 335 B), and in Plato wickedness
is misery.
οὐδ’ ἴκταρ βάλλει
: ‘are not within sight of.’ The proverb means
οὐδὲ ἐγγύς ἐστιν (Diogen. III 46. The other sources are given in Leutsch u. Schneidewin
Paroem. Gr. II p. 43). Eustathius (
in Od. II 292. 27, quoted by Schneider) argues for the rough breathing
ἵκταρ (see cr. n.), on the ground that the word comes from
ἱκνοῦμαι; but it is clear from his argument, as well as from the other authorities, that
ἴκταρ was the regular pronunciation.
ὅταν γὰρ δὴ κτλ.
The tyrannical man is like the philosopher in
one respect. He does not attain to his full development except in a city meet for him. See VI 497 A and Nettleship
Lect. and Rem. II p. 318. With
μετὰ δήμου ἀνοίας cf. Solon
Frag. 11 ed. Bergk.
πλεῖστον ‐‐ τύραννον
. The
τύραννος is
ἔρως: see 575 A
τυραννικῶς ἐν αὐτῷ ὁ Ἔρως—ζῶν and 573 D. This explanation, with which Schneider agrees, is better than to make
τύραννος equivalent merely to ‘the tyrannical element’ (cf. II 382 D note) and so weaken the force of
τυραννικώτατος γὰρ ἂν εἴη. Plato here ignores the fact that if a successful tyrant has strong passions he is usually not less strong in capacity and will. If he were entirely the slave of Passion, he would not prove successful.
ἐὰν μὲν κτλ.
Cf.
Prot. 325 D
. The idiom, which begins with Homer, is illustrated at length by Herwerden
Mn. XIX pp. 338 f. The reference in
ὥσπερ τότε is to 574 C.
νέους is ‘new’ (Schneider), not ‘young’: cf. VIII 568 A note, and
νεωστὶ φίλης, νεωστὶ φίλου 574 B, C.
μητρίδα Photius (ed. Porson I p. 268) thus explains:
μητρίδα· τὴν πατρίδα. καὶ Πλάτων καὶ Φερεκράτης. Cf. Synes.
Ep. 93. 1460 A Migne
μητρίδος, ὡς ἂν Κρῆτες εἴποιεν.
ἕξει τε καὶ θρέψει
: ‘will have and hold’ (“haben und halten” Schneider). There is no sarcasm in
θρέψει (“that is his way of supporting her!” J. and C.): nor does the word in this passage mean more than ‘keep.’
τοιοίδε γίγνονται
. τοιοίδε “ad sequentia spectat” (Schneider), and
γίγνονται=‘prove themselves,’ ‘shew themselves,’ as often.