ἐργάτης
: not simply ‘hardworking’ (D. and V.), but with reference to
illiberalis labor.
ἀναγκαίους
. This form of the feminine recurs in IV 425 D, supra 558 D, 559 A, 561 A (ter) and IX 572 C; but in 558 D we have
ἀναγκαῖαι, and
ἀναγκαία in 559 B, C. See Schneider on IV 425 D. There is no justification for making
ἀναγκαῖος consistently an adjective of either two or three terminations (as suggested by Richards). The full meaning of
ἀναγκαῖοι ἐπιθυμίαι is explained in 558 D ff.
τὰ ἄλλα ἀναλώματα
“sunt pecuniae in cetera impendendae, quas hic negatur
παρέχεσθαι, de suis praebere” (Schneider). With
ἄλλα cf.
ἄλλης 554 C, and with
παρεχόμενος IV 421 D note The translation ‘not affording or allowing himself’ (J. and C.) is inaccurate.
παραδεχόμενος, which was read, with slight MS authority, before Bekker, has been rightly discarded by later editors.
οὓς δή
. For the plural cf. (with Stallbaum)
Laws 908 D and
Eur.
Hel. 440
<*>λλην πεφυκώς, οἷσιν οὐκ ἐπιστροφαί. See also on I 347 A.
τυφλὸν κτλ.
τὸν Πλοῦτον,
οἷμαι, φησίν says a Scholiast in the margin of A. See Blaydes on
Ar.
Plut. 90
. Hirmer (
Entst. u. Komp. d. Pl. Pol. p. 658 note) doubts whether the god of Wealth is represented as blind earlier than Aristophanes; but a
σκόλιον of Timocreon began
ὤφελέν σ’ ὦ τυφλὲ Πλοῦτε (Schol. on
Ar.
Ach. 532
). With the figure in
τοῦ χοροῦ cf. VI 490 C and infra 560 E.
ἐτίμα μάλιστα
. See cr. n. Schneider's admirable emendation is now universally accepted: cf.
μάλιστα ἔντιμα above and
τιμᾶν μηδὲν ἄλλο ἢ πλοῦτον 553 D. On the corruption see
Introd. § 5.
κηφηνώδεις κτλ.
As oligarchy has ‘drones’ (552 C), so the oligarchical man has ‘drone desires.’ The parallel is worked out with unusual completeness, even for Plato: see on 555 A.
μὴ φῶμεν
. 552 D note
κατεχομένας κτλ.
Cf. 552 E.
ἄλλης=
περὶ τὰ ἄλλα: cf.
ἄλλα in 554 A. The translation ‘his general habit of carefulness’ (J. and C.) is scarcely right: cf.
περὶ τῆς ἄλλης οὐσίας τρέμων in D below.
αὐτῶν
: not
κηφηνωδῶν ἐπιθυμιῶν, but the plural masculine, in spite of
αὐτῷ above (I 347 A note).
ὥστε πολλῆς κτλ.
See II 359 B ff. Socrates would say that the picture which Glauco there draws is only too true of the oligarchical man.
τούτῳ δῆλον
: ‘clear by this,’ ‘clear from this,’ as in
Eur.
Hipp. 627
τού τῳ δὲ δῆλον and
Ar.
Plut. 587
(
τούτῳ δηλοῖ). Stallbaum reads
τοῦτο with
Ξ and a majority of the inferior MSS; but there is no reason for deserting A and II. The antecedent to
τούτῳ is contained in
οἶσθ’ οὖν—ἀδικεῖν. From the fact that such a person
κακουργεῖ when he gets the chance, it is clear (says Socrates) that when he
εὐδοκιμεῖ δοκῶν δίκαιος εἶναι, he achieves this result only by doing violence to himself.
ἐπιεικεῖ κτλ.
: ‘by a sort of virtuous self-constraint’ not (as Campbell) ‘by some virtuous element in himself he forcibly restrains.’
βίᾳ is a verbal noun as in
βίᾳ τῶν ἐχθρῶν (566 A) and the like.
τινι qualifies
ἐπιεικής: there is no real
ἐπιείκεια in this sort of thing: cf.
Phaed. 69 A
ff.
εὑρήσεις
: see cr. n. The addition of
ἐν above the line by A^{2} is hardly sufficient to justify
ἐνευρήσεις, especially as
εὑρήσεις has much more support from the other MSS.
ἐνευρίσκω has not yet been proved classical (see Jebb on
Soph.
Aj. 1144
), and Schneider afterwards (
Addit. p. 65) retracted his defence of it here. The distance of
τοῖς πολλοῖς from
ἐνούσας ἐπιθυμίας is no real difficulty, especially after
ἐπιθυμίας ἐνούσας just above.
τὰς τοῦ κηφῆνος ξυγγενεῖς κτλ.
Cf. VII 519 B, C note For
ἀστασίαστος see on 545 C.
διπλοῦς: like the oligarchical State, which is ‘not one, but two’ (551 D).
ἡρμοσμένης τῆς ψυχῆς
. Richards would omit
τῆς, but the article (which is in all MSS), implies, I think, that such a soul exists and has already been described, as it has in
ἕνα γενόμενον ἐκ πολλῶν, σώφρονα καὶ ἡρμοσμένον IV 443 D, E.
ἀνταγωνιστής γε κτλ.
See on 551 E. Susemihl
Gen. Entw. II p. 232 reminds us of the disinclination on the part of rich Athenians to undertake
λειτουργίαι: see Hermann-Thumser l.c. pp. 687 ff.