τὸ ἐξεῖναι κτλ.
According to some ancient authorities (cited in Hermann-Thumser l. c. pp. 186 f.), the constitution of Lycurgus absolutely forbade the alienation of a certain minimum of the original
κλῆρος, called the
ἀρχαία μοῖρα. The evidence of Plato does not go far, but so far as it does go, it supports this view; for he says that oligarchy is the
first polity which permits a citizen
πάντα τὰ αὑτοῦ ἀποδίδοσθαι: cf. also
Laws 744 D. Aristotle says nothing of the
ἀρχαία μοῖρα, and states that a Spartan might legally part with his estate by gift or bequest, although to sell it was
οὐ καλόν (
Pol. B 9. 1270^{a} 19 ff.). The conflict of evidence is discussed by Newman and Susemihl on Arist. l.c.: see also on the other side Hermann-Thumser l. c. pp. 259 f. In many Greek States besides Sparta it was either illegal, or at least dishonourable, to dispose of the ‘ancient lot’: see Whibley
Gk Olig. pp. 113—115.
οὔκουν κτλ.
Schneider was the first to give this sentence to Adimantus, and
ὀρθῶς to Socrates, “qui quum paucorum gubernationem
primam illud vitium recipere persuasum haberet eamque sententiam verbis
ὅρα δή etc. aperte demonstrasset, suffragante Adimanto rursus in dubium sine causa rem vocare non debebat.” Cf. 554 B. Baiter and others ought not to have reverted to the old arrangement. For
οὔκουν—γε see Neil's edition of the
Knights of Aristophanes p. 195.
εἰς ἅ
: i.e. for
χρηματισμός, δημιουργία and the other purposes specified in 552 A.
ἐδόκει
: sc.
ἄλλο τι ἢ ἀναλωτής (Schneider). This explanation, which is, I think, neater and more pointed than to supply
τῶν ἀρχόντων, makes
ἦν—ἀναλωτής indispensable. Herwerden was wrong in any case when he bracketed these words.
ἐν κηρίῳ
: not ‘in the hive’ (as D. and V.), but ‘in a cell.’ The drone-cell in which the drone is produced stands to the whole hive as the
οἰκία to the
πόλις. For
κηρίον in this sense, see Bonitz
Ind. Arist. s.v.
τὸν τοιοῦτον ‐‐ κηφῆνα
. The comparison is frequent in Greek literature from Hesiod onwards (
O D. 304 ff.): see Ruhnken on Tim.
Lex. s.v.
κηφήνεσσι κοθούροισι and Blaydes on
Ar.
Wasps 1114
. “We would purge the land of the drones, that rob the bee of her honey” (
Pericles Prince of Tyre II 1. 50).
τελευτῶσιν
: i.q.
τελευτῶντές εἰσιν. ‘To the stingless belong those who die paupers in their old age.’
πρὸς τὸ γῆρας is adverbial as in VI 498 A. Stallbaum and others understand
τελευτῶσιν as only ‘tandem fiunt’; but the other view— Schneider's—is better and more natural: cf. II 372 D
γηραιοὶ τελευτῶντες and
Symp. 179 E
.
πάντες
: sc.
εἰσίν (understood from
τελευτῶσιν) rather than
γίγνονται (as J. and C. explain).
ἐν πόλει κτλ.
Compare the melancholy picture of Athens in Isocrates
Areop. 83
τότε μὲν οὐδεὶς ἦν τῶν πολιτῶν ἐνδεὴς τῶν ἀναγκαίων, οὐδὲ προσαιτῶν τοὺς ἐντυγχάνοντας τὴν πόλιν κατῄσχυνε, νῦν δὲ πλείους εἰσὶν οἱ σπανίζοντες τῶν ἐχόντων· οἷς ἄξιόν ἐστι πολλὴν συγγνώμην ἔχειν, εἰ μηδὲν τῶν κοινῶν φροντίζουσιν ἀλλὰ τοῦτο σκοποῦσιν, ὁπόθεν τὴν ἀεὶ παροῦσαν ἡμέραν διάξουσιν. The
Areopagiticus was published about 354 B.C.
ὀλίγου γε ‐‐ ἀρχόντων
. Plato's description may be illustrated from the state of Athens just before Solon's legislation: see Solon
Fr. 36 ed. Bergk = Arist.
Ath. Pol. 12. 4. The words
χρησμὸν λέγοντας (in line 9 of the fragment) are certainly not, as some have thought, a corruption of
χρείους φυγόντας (as in Aristotle's text), but point to a different recension.
χρῃσμὸν λέγοντας ‘gathering alms’ has been suggested (cf.
χρῄζω, χρησμοσύνη), and may I think be the original from which the first of the two variants comes.
μὴ οὖν οἰώμεθα
: ‘are we, then, not to suppose?’
μή is not ‘num,’ but the negative and goes with
οἰώμεθα: cf. I 337 B
μὴ ἀποκρίνωμαι ὧν προεῖπες μηδέν; and infra 554 B with other examples cited by Stallbaum: see also Kühner
Gr. Gr. II p. 187. The positive counterpart of this idiom is
οἰώμεθα or
βούλει οἰώμεθα: and the negative is due to the jussive idea on which the subjunctive logically depends.
οἰόμεθα (see cr. n.) is retained by Schneider and others,
μή being construed as ‘num.’ But ‘we do not, then, suppose, do we,’ overdoes the irony, and Stallbaum's explanation is better in every way. On the interchange of
ο and
ω in Paris A see
Introd. § 5.
ἐπιμελείᾳ
= ‘deliberately,’ ‘consulto,’ is a rare but well-established adverb: see
Xen.
Cyr. V 3. 47
,
Mag. Eq. 7. 9 and cf.
κατ’ ἐπιμέλειαν in
Hell. IV 4. 8. The magistrates resign themselves to the presence of these
κακοῦργοι, and instead of removing the cause—
ἀπαιδευσία καὶ κακὴ τροφὴ καὶ κατάστασις τῆς πολιτείας—as they
should do, they ‘deliberately hold them down by force.’ Plato emphatically believed that ‘force is no remedy.’ Cf. the corresponding account of the oligarchical man in 554 C, D
κατέχει ἄλλας κακὰς ἐπιθυμίας ἐνούσας, οὐ πείθων ὅτι οὐκ ἄμεινον, οὐδ’ ἡμερῶν λόγῳ, ἀλλ’ ἀνάγκῃ καὶ φόβῳ κτλ. Schneider's translation ‘carefully’ (sorgfältig) is inaccurate; but he was right in holding that
ἐπιμελείᾳ and not
βίᾳ (as J. and C. suppose) is the adverb. We certainly cannot understand
ἐπιμελείᾳ as =
ὑπὸ τῆς ἄλλης ἐπιμελείας in spite of 554 C. The suggestions
καὶ βίᾳ (Stephanus) and [
ἐπιμελεία ]
βίᾳ (J. J. Hartman) are superfluous.
ἀπαιδευσίαν
. ἀπαιδευσία is a feature of the oligarchical State and man: cf. 554 B, 559 D.