χιλιέτη
. Cf. Virg.
Aen. VI 748 ff. has omnes, ubi
mille rotam volvere
per annos | Lethaeum ad fluvium deus evocat agmine magno. There is little doubt that both Virgil and Plato took the period of 1000 years from some Orphic or Pythagorean source: see Dieterich l.c. pp. 116 ff. It will be observed that the thousand years do not, in the
Republic, include the lifetime of the soul on earth, which Plato estimates at 100 years (615 B). In the
Phaedrus on the other hand the entire interval from birth to birth is reckoned at 1000 years (249 A ff., compared with 248 D, E).
εὐπαθείας ‐‐ κάλλος
suggests the beatific visions of the
Phaedrus (247 A ff.).
πολλοῦ χρόνου
: sc.
ἐστί, as in
Laws IV 708 D
χρόνου πολλοῦ καὶ παγχάλεπον (Stallbaum). It is worse than needless to insert
δεῖ (with Liebhold) after
χρόνου.
ὅσα ‐‐ ἠδίκησαν
. In Plato, as in Dante, doing wrong to others is the great sin.
τοῦτο δ’ εἶναι κτλ.
‘that is,’ said he, ‘once in every hundred years.’
τοῦτο δ’ εἶναι (‘namely’) explains
ὑπὲρ ἑκάστου δεκάκις. This view is simpler and more idiomatic than (with Schneider) to make
τοῦτο=
τὸ δίκην δοῦναι ἐν μέρει ὑπὲρ ἑκάστου.
ὄντος τοσούτου
. The same duration of human life is postulated also in
Phaedr. 248 D
ff., but retribution in that dialogue appears to be
ἐννάκις, and not
δεκάκις as here; cf. 256 E with 248 E. The number 100 is the square of the Pythagorean ‘perfect’ number 10, so that Pythagorean influence is doubtless at work again. See App. I to Book VIII p. 301, and cf. 614 B note It should also be remarked that the Greeks, like other races, had many stories to tell of the
μακρόβιοι of early days, and the ‘Naturvölker’ of historic times were also credited with preternaturally long lives: see the evidence collected by Rohde
Griech. Roman pp. 218, 236, 247 notes
πολλῶν
. See cr. n. Par. D—followed here by Burnet—has
πολλοῖς, “quod propter pluralem
θανάτων ferri nequit” (Schneider). The passage quoted by J. and C. in defence of
πολλοῖς from
Laws IX 870 D
τοὺς οὖν τούτων μηνυτὰς ἀναιροῦσι θανάτοις is not quite parallel.
πόλεις προδόντες κτλ.
So in Virg.
Aen. VI 620 vendidit hic auro patriam. Antiphon (
de Her. Caed. 10) names as the three chiefest sins
τὸ ἀποκτείνειν καὶ τὸ ἱεροσυλεῖν καὶ τὸ προδιδόναι τὴν πόλιν. Cf. also Dieterich
Nek. pp. 66 ff.
εἰς δουλείας ἐμβεβληκότες
is parallel, as Schneider points out, to
αἴτιοι and not to
προδόντες.
καὶ αὖ ‐‐ κομίζοιντο
. It is not at first sight clear whether this applies to those who have come
ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ, or to those who, though condemned on the whole account, have done some good actions in their lives, and occasionally shewn themselves just and pious. The latter view is supported by
Phaed. 113 D
ἐκεῖ (in Acheron)
οἰκοῦσί τε καὶ καθαιρό‐
μενοι τῶν τε ἀδικημάτων διδόντες δίκας ἀπολύονται, εἴ τίς τι ἠδίκηκεν, τῶν τε εὐεργεσιῶν τιμὰς φέρονται κατὰ τὴν ἀξίαν ἕκαστος, and is, I believe, what Plato means. Cf. 616 B note
εὐεργετηκότες
. A few MSS, including
q, have
εὐηργετηκότες, which Rutherford (
New Phryn. p. 245) and the grammarians regard as the regular Attic form: but
εὐεργέτηκεν is found on Inscriptions of the 4th Century B.C. See Meisterhans^{3} p. 172 and Kühner-Blass I 2. p. 33.
τῶν δὲ εὐθὺς κτλ.
: ‘about those who died as soon as they were born, and those who had lived but a short time’ etc., lit. “about the ‘as-soon-as-they-wereborn’ and the ‘short-lived’ etc.” The
εὐθὺς γενόμενοι and the
ὀλίγον χρόνον βιοῦντες were probably two well-recognised categories of the
ἄωροι (as to whom see Rohde
Psyche^{2} II pp. 411 ff.): hence the article
τῶν. Cf. Virg.
Aen. VI 428
dulcis vitae exsortes, et
ab ubere raptos. A
limbus infantum appears to have been a feature of early Orphic pictures of the underworld (Dieterich
Nek. p. 158). It is unwise to insert
ἀποθανόντων (Ast, Stallbaum) or
ἀπογενομένων (Herwerden, Baiter) after
γενομένων, or to read
<ἀπο>γενομένων (Cobet), for, as Schneider observes, “de mortuis hic agi in aperto est.” Schneider's own interpretation may be gathered from his note “nec nostrates, opinor offenderet
von denen, die eben erst geboren gewesen etiam non addito
als sie starben.” I agree with Stallbaum in doubting whether
εὐθύς can have this meaning: and it is safer, I think, to understand
εὐθὺς γενόμενοι in the ordinary way. Others think that only one category is intended, taking
ὀλίγον χρόνον βιούντων as equivalent to
ἀποθανόντων (Purves, and so also D. and V. “those whose death followed close upon their birth”). But
καί cannot be so easily ignored.
εἰς δὲ θεοὺς κτλ.
Cf.
Xen.
Mem. IV 4. 19
, 20
παρὰ πᾶσιν ἀνθρώποις πρῶτον νομίζεται τοὺς θεοὺς σέβειν. Οὐκοῦν καὶ γονέας τιμᾶν πανταχοῦ νομίζεται;
Καὶ τοῦτο, ἔφη, and Pind.
Pyth. 6. 23—27 and other passages in Nägelsbach
Nachhom. Theol. pp. 191 ff., 275 ff. The categories of sinners in the
Phaedo (113 E—114 B) correspond very nearly to those mentioned here. Cf. Dieterich
Nek. pp. 165 ff.
αὐτόχειρος φόνου
. See cr. n. In common with most editors I have adopted
αὐτόχειρος in place of
αὐτόχειρας. The error was easy, and the change is slight. Schneider understands
εἰς before
αὐτόχειρας, in a different sense from that which it bears with
θεούς and
γονέας. “Contorta sane loci interpretatio,” says Stallbaum, rightly.
αὐτόχειρ φόνος (cf. the
ἀνδροφόνοι of the
Phaedo l.c.) does not necessarily mean either ‘suicide’ or ‘the murder of near relations’ (D. and V.), but merely ‘slaying with one's own hand,’ ‘homicide.’ See Jebb on
Soph.
Ant. 55
.
Ἀρδιαῖος
: a purely fictitious personage, no doubt, although verisimilitude is preserved by
χιλιοστόν: cf.
εἶναι δὲ τὴν πορείαν χιλιέτη 615 A.
οὐδ) ἂν ἥξει
. ἄν with the future indicative is scarcely here ‘colloquial’ (as Goodwin holds,
MT. p. 66), but has a solemn, half-tragic or poetical effect. There is the usual supply of emendations, such as
οὐδ’ αὖ ἥξει (Madvig)
οὐδ’ ἀνήξει (Herwerden),
οὐδὲ μὴ ἥξει (Cobet),
οὐδὲ δὴ ἥξει (Richards); but the idiom is sufficiently well established (see on VI 492 C), and, as Turner remarks, the variant
ἥξοι (in
Ξ and three other MSS) is itself also evidence in favour of
ἄν.
σχεδόν τι ‐‐ τυράννους
. Cf.
Gorg. 525 D
ο<*>μαι δὲ καὶ τοὺς πολλοὺς εἶναι τούτων τῶν παραδειγμάτων ἐκ τυράννων καὶ βασιλέων καὶ δυναστῶν καὶ τὰ τῶν πόλεων πραξάντων γεγονότας.
ἦσαν δὲ καὶ κτλ.
: not “erant vero etiam aliqui privati ex eorum numero, qui magna perpetraverant facinora” (Stallbaum), but “erant vero etiam nonnulli privati et quidem de genere magnorum peccatorum” (after Schneider). With
ἦσαν cf.
Phaed. 59 B
ἦν δὲ καὶ Κτήσιππος and
Prot. 315 A
.
ἐμυκᾶτο
. Cf. Arist.
an. post. II 11. 94^{b} 32
βροντᾷ—ὡς οἱ Πυθαγόρειοί φασιν, ἀπειλῆς ἕνεκα τοῖς ἐν τῷ ταρτάρῳ, ὅπως φοβῶνται (quoted by Zeller^{5} I p. 451 note 3). See also Plut.
de gen. Socr. 591 C. The remarks of Proclus on this part of the myth deserve quotation:
πάντα γὰρ ταῦτα φρικώδεις μὲν ποιεῖ τὰς ποινὰς καὶ ἀπαραιτήτους, ἀνυπερβλήτους δὲ τὰς μοχθηρίας δείκνυσι τῶν κολαζομένων, εἴπερ καὶ τὰ ἄψυχα φωνὴν ἀφίησιν ἔμψυχον κατ’ αὐτῶν καὶ τὰ κολάζοντα φάσματα δυσαντίβλεπτα καὶ τὰ δεσμωτήρια ἄφυκτα (l.c. p. 180).
ἀνιάτως ἐχόντων
. Cf.
Phaed. 113 E
οἳ δ’ ἂν δόξωσιν ἀνιάτως ἔχειν διὰ τὰ μεγέθη τῶν ἁμαρτημάτων κτλ. See on II 380 B.
ἄνδρες ‐‐ ἄγριοι κτλ.
These are the prototypes of the
κολάζοντες ἄγγελοι of later apocalyptic literature: see for example Petri
Apoc. vv. 21, 23 (Dieterich
Nek. pp. 4 and 60). Cf. also Euseb.
Praep. Ev. XIII 13. 5.
ἔφη
: sc.
ὁ ἐρωτώμενος (supra D).
τοὺς μὲν ‐‐ ἦγον
. διαλαβεῖν· παλαιστρικόν τι (Hesychius). The word is explained in Bekker
Anecd. 36 as
τὸ ἑκατέρωθέν τινος λαβέσθαι. Cf. Hdt. IV 68
διαλελαμμένος ἄγεται, I 114 al. Some malefactors they seized in this forcible way and marched off direct to Tartarus (see on 616 A): others, and among them Ardiaeus, they tortured first, and utilised as
παραδείγματα (infra 616 A note). Schneider translates “die nehmen die einen und führten sie abseits,” understanding
διαλαβεῖν as ‘take aside’: a usage for which the lexica rightly or wrongly quote
Aesch.
F. L. 41
διαλαμβάνων γὰρ ἕκαστον ἡμῶν ἐν μέρει. The variants
ἰδίᾳ λαβόντες (
Ξ and some other MSS),
ἰδίᾳ παραλαβόντες (Euseb.
Praep. Ev. XIII 13. 5 and Clem.
Strom. V 133 Migne) etc. point to a similar but not identical interpretation: cf. also Proclus l.c. p. 182. 6 ff.
διαλαβόντες γὰρ ἄγουσιν οἳ μὲν ἄλλους, οἳ δὲ ἄλλους· τοῦτο γὰρ τὸ διαλαβεῖν, οἷον διανείμασθαι τὰς κολάσεις. But
τοὺς μέν seems clearly to refer to some of the
ἀνιάτως ἔχοντες, and none of this class is likely to have met with gentle treatment at the hands of the
ἄνδρες διάπυροι. In
Phaed. 113 E
all the incurables are thrown
εἰς τὸν Τάρταρον, ὅθεν οὔποτε ἐκβαίνουσιν. It may be noted that the reading
διαλαβόντες is confirmed by Plutarch's imitation
τοῦτον ἡ Δίκη διαλαβοῦσα (
de ser. num. vind. 565 A).