Πλάτωνος Πολιτεία
. On the name, characters, and date of action of the dialogue, see
Introd. §§ 1, 2, 3.
ἢ τὸ δίκαιον
: i.e.
ἢ τὸ δίκαιον εἶναι τῷ δικαίῳ. The reading
αὑτῷ (found in A, but no dependence can be put on this MS in such matters) would require the omission of the article before
δίκαιον (so Stallbaum and others). Tucker inclines to render ‘how much more he is personally benefited by being unjust than by justice,’ but the ordinary view is preferable.
ἣ οὐ κτλ.
This laboured sentence is perhaps intended as a parody of some sophistic style: cf.
Gorg. 448 C
.
ὧν
depends on
μέρει
.
ἀνδραποδισταί
: ‘kidnappers.’ The word is defined by Pollux III 78 as
ὁ τὸν ἐλεύθερον καταδουλωσάμενος ἢ τὸν ἀλλότριον οἰκέτην ἀπαγόμενος. Thessaly had an evil name for this kind of crime (Blaydes on
Ar.
Plut. 521
); but the frequent references to it in Attic literature shew that Greece itself was not exempt. See on IX 575 B and the article in Stephanus-Hase
Thes. s.v.
τῶν τοιούτων κακουργημάτων
is usually explained as depending on
κατὰ μέρη, but as
κατὰ μέρη is adverbial, this is somewhat awkward. It is perhaps better to regard the genitive as partitive,
τι being omitted as in
κινήσειεν ἂν τῶν ἀξίων λόγου νόμων IV 445 E, where see note.
πρὸς τοῖς ‐‐ χρήμασιν
is virtually equivalent to
πρὸς τῷ τὰ τῶν πολιτῶν ἀφελέσθαι, and combined by zeugma with
δουλώσηται. Cf. I 330 E note
εὐδαίμονες ‐‐ κέκληνται
. The generic singular
τις has become a plural, as in
Phaed. 109 D
, infra VII 536 A. Envy of tyranny and tyrants was common in the Athens of Plato's younger days: compare
Gorg. 484 A
, 470 D (where it is maintained by Polus that Archelaus of Macedon is
εὐδαίμων, and Socrates says
ὀλίγου σοι πάντες συμφήσουσι ταῦτα Ἀθηναῖοι καὶ οἱ ξένοι 472 A) and
Alc. II 141 A ff. The plays of Euripides in particular (see VIII 568 A) often eulogised the tyrant: e.g.
Troad. 1169 ff.,
Fr. 252,
Phoen. 524 ff. In earlier days Solon's friends had blamed him for not making himself tyrant of Athens: see the dramatic fragment (33 ed. Bergk), where the prevalent passion for tyranny is forcibly expressed in the lines
ἤθελον γάρ κεν κρατήσας, πλοῦτον ἄφθονον λαβὼν |
καὶ τυραννεύσας Ἀθηνῶν μοῦνον ἡμέραν μίαν, |
ἀσκὸς ὕστερον δεδάρθαι κἀπιτετρῖφθαι γένος (4—6). See also Newman's
Politics of Aristotle I pp. 388—392.
οὐ γὰρ ‐‐ τὴν ἀδικίαν
. Cf.
Gorg. 483 A
φύσει μὲν γὰρ πᾶν αἴσχιόν ἐστιν, ὅπερ καὶ κάκιον, τὸ ἀδικεῖσθαι, νόμῳ δὲ τὸ ἀδικεῖν.
ἱκανῶς γιγνομένη
: ‘realised on an adequate scale’ (D. and V.). For the construction of
γίγνεσθαι with an adverb cf. (with Ast)
Soph. 230 C
and infra VI 504 C. After
τὸ δ’ ἄδικον below, Herwerden would insert
τό to go with
ἑαυτῷ λυσιτελοῦν τε καὶ ξυμφέρον, but only
τυγχάνει (and not
τυγχάνει ὄν) is to be understood after
ἄδικον; nor is the last clause intended as a strict and formal definition of injustice.
καταντλήσας
. For the metaphor cf. infra VII 536 B,
Lys. 204 D
, Lucian
Dem. Enc. 16 (imitated from this passage) and other examples in Blaydes on
Ar.
Wasps 483
.
ἐμβαλών
: cf.
Theaet. 165 D
,
Prot. 342 E
. The whole expression recalls the Latin proverb
scrupulum abeunti (Cic.
de Fin. IV 80).
διαγόμενος
. The use of this verb in
Soph.
El. 782
χρόνος διῆγέ με, Dem. 18. 89
πόλεμος—διῆγεν ὑμᾶς, Xen.
Rep. Lac. I 3 and elsewhere is in favour of regarding
διαγόμενος (‘living’) as grammatically passive and not middle both here and in
Laws 758 A. Cf. Stephanus-Hase
Thes. s.v.
διάγω.
ἐγὼ γὰρ κτλ.
I agree with Stallbaum and others in taking this sentence as interrogative: ‘do you mean that
I think otherwise about this matter?’ i.e. think that it is
not a question of
βίου διαγωγή. J. and C. complain that this interpretation is “wanting in point.” It is surely much to the point to make Thrasymachus repudiate the imputation of trifling. His doctrine appears all the more dangerous when he confesses that it is no sophistic paradox, but a rule of life. I can see nothing to justify Apelt's conjecture
ἔγωγ’ ἄῤ for
ἐγὼ γὰρ (
Observ. Crit. p. 11).
ἤτοι ἡμῶν γε
. ἤτοι or
ἤτοι—γε= ‘or else’ (not ‘or rather’ as J. and C.). The regular construction is
ἤτοι—ἤ, and
ἤ—ἤτοι was condemned by the grammarians as a solecism, though it occurs in Pind.
Nem. 6. 5. With the use of
ἤτοι in this passage cf. III 400 C, IV 433 A
τοῦτό ἐστιν—ἤτοι τούτου τι εἶδος ἡ δικαιοσύνη. Emendations have been suggested on all these passages of Plato: here
ἤ τοι (van Prinsterer, Hartman) and in the other two passages
ἤ: but we are not justified in altering the text. Cf. Kugler
de partic.
τοι
eiusque comp. ap. Pl. usu p. 14.