ἢ καὶ ἄλλα
. ἄλλα must be coordinated with
αἰσχρολογοῦντας, not with
νήφοντας, so that Hartman's correction (
καί for
ἢ καί), though scarcely necessary, is an improvement, and may be right.
μαινομένοις
. As in the
Eumenides, Ajax, Hercules Furens.
γνωστέον κτλ.
cf. 409 A.
μιμητέον
. See on
μιμεῖσθαι 395 D.
ἵππους ‐‐ βροντάς
. The reference is probably to stage machinery and musical effects etc. in dramatic poetry generally, as well as in the later and degenerate form of the dithyramb (see on 394 C). Cf. (with Nettleship
Lect. and Rem. II p. 105)
Laws 669 C ff. and
Ar.
Plut. 290
ff. The
βροντεῖον and
κεραυνοσκοπεῖον for producing thunder and lightning were familiar enough (Müller
Gr. Bühnenalt. p. 157 note 2). It is clear, as Nettleship remarks, that “Plato felt strongly that Greek literature and music were declining” in his days: see
Laws 659 A ff., 700 A ff., 797 A ff.
ὁ μὲν ‐‐ ἀνήρ
. It seems difficult (as Schneider remarked) either to connect
ὁ μέν with
μέτριος ἀνήρ, or to understand
ὁ μέν as ‘the one’ and suppose that
μέτριος ἀνήρ is in apposition to it. If the latter alternative is right, we should expect
μέτριος < ὢν > ἀνήρ, or
< ὁ > μέτριος ἀνήρ, and in view of other cases in which the article is placed at some distance from its noun (e.g.
ὁ δέ γε, οἶμαι, ἦν δ’ ἐγώ, καταληφθεὶς θανάτῳ δίδοται VIII 566 C), I still prefer the former view. Some may be inclined to regard
μέτριος ἀνήρ as a gloss. I have sometimes been tempted to make
μοι δοκεῖ parenthetical (exactly=‘methinks’), in which case
ὁ μέν can easily be connected with
μέτριος. The idiom occurs in
Phaed. 108 D
ὁ βίος μοι δοκεῖ ὁ ἐμός—τῷ μήκει τοῦ λόγου οὐκ ἐξαρκεῖ and
Menex. 236 B
: cf. also
Crito 43 D, 50 B, and I 332 E note This solution would involve the change of
ἐθελήσειν to
ἐθελήσει—so
v—and of
αἰσχυνεῖσθαι to
αἰσχυνεῖται just below, as well as again in D. Such a corruption, once started,
ἔρχεται—as Plato might say —
ὡς κύκλος αὐξανομένη; but I do not venture to change the text.
καὶ ἧττον
is not superfluous with
ἐλάττω. ἐλάττω means ‘in fewer respects,’ and
ἧττον ‘to a less degree.’
σπουδῇ
. Cf.
ὅ τι μὴ παιδιᾶς χάριν in E and
σπουδῇ 397 A.
ὅ τι μὴ παιδιᾶς χάριν
. Cf. VII 518 B.
οἵᾳ
. According to Van Cleef (
de Attract. usu Plat. p. 36),
οἷος is not elsewhere attracted in Plato.
τῆς ἁπλῆς
. See cr. n. The reading of the MSS
τῆς ἄλλης ought strictly speaking to mean ‘the rest of
διήγησις,’ i.e. besides
μίμησις. A reference to 392 D will shew that the rest of
διήγησις includes (1) simple
διήγησις, (2) the mixed style. If the text is sound, Plato therefore says that the good man's
λέξις will resemble Homer's in partaking of all three varieties. This is a cumbrous and unnecessary elaboration: for if style partakes both in
μίμησις and in simple
διήγησις, it is already
ipso facto ‘mixed.’ To take
ἄλλης as ‘besides’ may be admissible, but in any case it is desirable to define the kind of
διήγησις meant. I believe that Plato wrote
ἁπλῆς. The good man's style will resemble Homer's, which has already been said to partake of
μίμησις (393 C) and of
ἁπλῆ διήγησις (394 B). The corruption—common in uncial MSS—is illustrated by Bast
Comment. Palaeogr. p. 730. Cf. my article in
Cl. Rev. X pp. 384 f.
μέρος
(as Schneider points out) depends on
μετέχουσα: cf.
Euthyd. 306 A
ὦν ἀμφοτέρων μέρος μετέχουσι.