Plato Republic 3.396

Paul Shorey (Translator)

Republic. Plato. Paul Shorey (Translator). Cambridge, MA. 1935-37.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Republic (English) (Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vol. 5-6. Shorey, Paul, translator. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1935-37 (printing).)

Editions (1)
Πολιτεία Perseus (Platonis Opera Tomus IV: Tetralogia VIII. Burnet, John, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1905.) — 3.396 focus

Notes on the current edition

Republic

1. Cf. Laws 816 D-E.
2. For this rejection of violent realism Cf. Laws 669 C-D. Plato describes exactly what Verhaeren’s admirers approve:
often in his rhythm can be heard the beat of hammers, the hard, edged, regular whizzing of wheels, the whirring of looms, the hissing of locomotives; often the wild, restless tumult of the streets, the humming and rumbling of dense masses of people.
(Stefan Zweig). So another modern critic celebrates
the cry of a baby in a Strauss symphony, the sneers and snarls of his critics in his Helden Leben, the contortions of the Dragon in Wagner’s Siegfried .
3. Chaucer drew from a misapplication of Timaeus 29 B or Boethius the opposite moral:
Who shall telle a tale after a man,
He most reherse, as neighe as ever he can,
Everich word, if it be in his charge,
All speke he never so rudely and so large;
Eke Plato sayeth, who so can him rede,
The words most ben cosin to the dede.
4. Plato, like Howells and some other modern novelists, would have thought somewhat gross comedy less harmful than the tragedy or romance that insidiously instils false ideals.
5. The respondent plays on the double meaning of οὐδὲν λέγεις and replies, Yes indeed you do say something, namely the type and pattern, etc.

Commentary

Commentary on Plato, Republic (Plato. The Republic, Vol 1-2. Adam, James, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902-1903.) focus

ἢ καὶ ἄλλα . ἄλλα must be coordinated with αἰσχρολογοῦντας, not with νήφοντας, so that Hartman's correction ( καί for ἢ καί), though scarcely necessary, is an improvement, and may be right.

μαινομένοις . As in the Eumenides, Ajax, Hercules Furens.

γνωστέον κτλ. cf. 409 A.

μιμητέον . See on μιμεῖσθαι 395 D.

ἵππους ‐‐ βροντάς . The reference is probably to stage machinery and musical effects etc. in dramatic poetry generally, as well as in the later and degenerate form of the dithyramb (see on 394 C). Cf. (with Nettleship Lect. and Rem. II p. 105) Laws 669 C ff. and Ar. Plut. 290 ff. The βροντεῖον and κεραυνοσκοπεῖον for producing thunder and lightning were familiar enough (Müller Gr. Bühnenalt. p. 157 note 2). It is clear, as Nettleship remarks, that “Plato felt strongly that Greek literature and music were declining” in his days: see Laws 659 A ff., 700 A ff., 797 A ff.

ὁ μὲν ‐‐ ἀνήρ . It seems difficult (as Schneider remarked) either to connect ὁ μέν with μέτριος ἀνήρ, or to understand ὁ μέν as ‘the one’ and suppose that μέτριος ἀνήρ is in apposition to it. If the latter alternative is right, we should expect μέτριος < ὢν > ἀνήρ, or < ὁ > μέτριος ἀνήρ, and in view of other cases in which the article is placed at some distance from its noun (e.g. ὁ δέ γε, οἶμαι, ἦν δ’ ἐγώ, καταληφθεὶς θανάτῳ δίδοται VIII 566 C), I still prefer the former view. Some may be inclined to regard μέτριος ἀνήρ as a gloss. I have sometimes been tempted to make μοι δοκεῖ parenthetical (exactly=‘methinks’), in which case ὁ μέν can easily be connected with μέτριος. The idiom occurs in Phaed. 108 D ὁ βίος μοι δοκεῖ ὁ ἐμός—τῷ μήκει τοῦ λόγου οὐκ ἐξαρκεῖ and Menex. 236 B : cf. also Crito 43 D, 50 B, and I 332 E note This solution would involve the change of ἐθελήσειν to ἐθελήσει—so v—and of αἰσχυνεῖσθαι to αἰσχυνεῖται just below, as well as again in D. Such a corruption, once started, ἔρχεται—as Plato might say — ὡς κύκλος αὐξανομένη; but I do not venture to change the text.

καὶ ἧττον is not superfluous with ἐλάττω. ἐλάττω means ‘in fewer respects,’ and ἧττον ‘to a less degree.’

σπουδῇ . Cf. ὅ τι μὴ παιδιᾶς χάριν in E and σπουδῇ 397 A.

ὅ τι μὴ παιδιᾶς χάριν . Cf. VII 518 B.

οἵᾳ . According to Van Cleef ( de Attract. usu Plat. p. 36), οἷος is not elsewhere attracted in Plato.

τῆς ἁπλῆς . See cr. n. The reading of the MSS τῆς ἄλλης ought strictly speaking to mean ‘the rest of διήγησις,’ i.e. besides μίμησις. A reference to 392 D will shew that the rest of διήγησις includes (1) simple διήγησις, (2) the mixed style. If the text is sound, Plato therefore says that the good man's λέξις will resemble Homer's in partaking of all three varieties. This is a cumbrous and unnecessary elaboration: for if style partakes both in μίμησις and in simple διήγησις, it is already ipso facto ‘mixed.’ To take ἄλλης as ‘besides’ may be admissible, but in any case it is desirable to define the kind of διήγησις meant. I believe that Plato wrote ἁπλῆς. The good man's style will resemble Homer's, which has already been said to partake of μίμησις (393 C) and of ἁπλῆ διήγησις (394 B). The corruption—common in uncial MSS—is illustrated by Bast Comment. Palaeogr. p. 730. Cf. my article in Cl. Rev. X pp. 384 f.

μέρος (as Schneider points out) depends on μετέχουσα: cf. Euthyd. 306 A ὦν ἀμφοτέρων μέρος μετέχουσι.