[258]
Soc.
one of them anyhow, as you say, looks like me in his cast of countenance, and the other has the same name and appellation, which implies some sort of kinship. 258a Of course we ought always to be eager to get acquainted with our relatives by debating with them. Now I myself had an argument with Theaetetus yesterday and have been listening to his answers just now, but I do not know Socrates in either way and must examine him, too. But let him reply to you now; my turn will come by and by.Str.
Very well; Socrates, do you hear what Socrates says?Y. Soc.
Yes.Str.
And do you agree?Y. Soc.
Certainly.Str.
There seems to be no objection on your part, and I suppose there should be still less on mine. Well, then, after the sophist, I think it is our next duty to seek for the statesman; so please tell me: should we rank him also among those who have a science, or not?Y. Soc.
Yes.Str.
Must the sciences, then, be divided as when we were examining the sophist?Y. Soc.
Perhaps.Str.
In that case, Socrates, I think the division will not be along the same lines.Y. Soc.
How will it be?Str.
Along other lines.Y. Soc.
Very likely.Str.
Where, then, shall we find the statesman’s path? For we must find it, separate it from the rest, and imprint upon it the seal of a single class; then we must set the mark of another single class upon all the other paths that lead away from this, and make our soul conceive of all sciences as of two classes. 1Y. Soc.
This, Stranger, is now your affair, I think, not mine.Str.
And yet, Socrates, it must be your affair, too, when we have found the path.Y. Soc.
Quite true.Str.
Are not arithmetic and certain other kindred arts pure sciences, without regard to practical application, which merely furnish knowledge?Y. Soc.
Yes, they are.Str.
But the science possessed by the arts relating to carpentering and to handicraft in general is inherent in their application, 258e and with its aid they create objects which did not previously exist.Y. Soc.
To be sure.Str.
In this way, then, divide all science into two arts, calling the one practical, and the other purely intellectual.Y. Soc.
Let us assume that all science is one and that these are its two forms.Str.
Shall we then assume that the statesman, king, master, and householder too, for that matter, are all one, to be grouped under one title, or shall we say that there are as many arts as names? But let me rather help you to understand in this way.Y. Soc.
In what way?Statesman. Plato. Harold North Fowler (Translator). Cambridge, MA. 1925.
Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.
Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.