Xenophon Anabasis 3.4

Carleton L. Brownson (Translator)

View: By Section

Anabasis. Xenophon. Carleton L. Brownson (Translator). Cambridge, MA. 1921-1922.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Anabasis (English) (Xenophon in Seven Volumes, Vol. 2-3. Brownson, Carleton L, editor, translator. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1921-1922.)

Editions (1)
Ἀνάβασις Perseus (Xenophon. Opera omnia, Vol. 3. Marchant, Edgar Cardew, editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904.) — 3.4 focus

Notes on the current edition

Anabasis

1. This city, called by Xenophon Larisa, was the great Assyrian city of Calah , mentioned in Genesis, X. 11, 12.
2. Cyrus the Great ( 558-529 B.C.).
3. The ruins which Xenophon saw here were those of Nineveh , the famous capital of the Assyrian Empire. It is curious to find him dismissing this great Assyrian city (as well as Calah above) with the casual and misleading statement that
it was once inhabited by the Medes.
In fact, the capture of Nineveh by the Medes (c. 600 B.C.) was the precise event which closed the important period of its history, and it remained under the control of the Medes only during the succeeding half-century, i.e. until the Median Empire was in its turn overthrown by the Persians ( 549 B.C.). Xenophon, then, goes but one unimportant step backward in his historical note—perhaps because he did not care to go farther, perhaps because he was unable to do so.
4. Astyages, the last king of Media.
5. i.e. from his province in Asia Minor , when he came to inform Artaxerxes of Cyrus’ designs against him. See Xen. Anab. 1.2.4 .
6. cp. Xen. Anab. 2.4.8 .
7. cp. Xen. Anab. 2.4.25 .
8. i.e. on account of the dense throng of the enemy.
9. cp. Xen. Anab. 3.3.7-10 .
10. Xenophon remarks in Xen. Anab. 3.3.17 upon the large size of the stones employed in the Persian slings. The word also ( καὶ) can hardly refer back to that remark, but it may be that some further observation of the same sort in the original text (see critical note) of the present passage served to introduce what Xenophon now goes on to say about the Persian bows. It is implied in consequently ( ὥστε) that the Cretan bows were of approximately the same size as those of the Persians.
11. So that the arrows could be easily recovered.
12. i.e. commanders of fifties and twenty-fives, or of half and quarter companies.
13. The formation is a hollow square. Xenophon means by wings ( κέρατα, here and above) the right and left ends of the division which formed the front of the square, and by flanks ( πλευραί) the divisions which formed the sides of the square. Apparently three of the special companies were stationed at the middle of the front side of the square (cp. 43 below) and the other three in the corresponding position at the rear.
14. The squad, or quarter company, consisting of 25 men (i.e. 24 the leader), normally marched three abreast, i.e. with a front of three and a depth of eight. The company might be formed in any one of three ways: (a) one squad front and four deep, (b) two squads front and two deep, or (c) four squads front and one deep. Three companies ranged alongside one another in formation (a) would thus have a front of three squads or nine men, in formation (b) a front of eighteen men, and in formation (c) a front of thirty-six men. It is these three dispositions of the three special companies at the front of the square which Xenophon terms, respectively, by companies, by platoons, and by squads.
15. Which is most effective in a level country.
16. Like Xerxes’ troops at Thermopylae ( Hdt. 7.223 ).
17. i.e. as described in 25-26.
18. cp. Xen. Anab. 3.4.24
19. i.e. from the rear.
20. See Xen. Anab. 3.4.21 above and note 2 thereon.