Aristophanes Frogs 354

Frogs. Aristophanes. . 2026-09-08.

Current edition Experimental

English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (English) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Βάτραχοι Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 2. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.) — 354 focus
Translations (1)
Frogs (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Matthew Dillon). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.) — 354 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

357. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-5

Line 357

μηδὲ Κρατίνου τοῦ ταυροφάγου γλώττης Βακχεῖʼ ἐτελέσθη,
The phrase 'Κρατίνου τοῦ ταυροφάγου' (of the bull-eating Cratinus) is a notorious textual crux. While the scholia offer no alternative reading, the epithet 'ταυροφάγος' is otherwise unattested for Cratinus and semantically anomalous in a literary context. Scholars have long debated whether this represents a genuine, albeit obscure, biographical detail (perhaps alluding to a specific lost play or a physical characteristic), a corruption of a different word (such as 'ταυροκτόνου' or a reference to a specific ritual), or a deliberate, ironic distortion by the chorus to mock the poet's perceived gluttony or the violence of his old comedy. The lack of manuscript variants heightens the difficulty of resolving whether this is an authentic, albeit rare, contemporary nickname or a scribal error that has become canonical.

361. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-6

Line 361

ἢ τῆς πόλεως χειμαζομένης ἄρχων καταδωροδοκεῖται,
The participle χειμαζομένης, agreeing with τῆς πόλεως, employs a maritime metaphor ('being storm-tossed') for political crisis, a standard rhetorical trope in the late fifth century but here charged with specific irony given the play's setting during the final years of the Peloponnesian War. The syntax of the genitive absolute construction (ἢ... χειμαζομένης ἄρχων) places the state of the city as the condition for the ruler's corruption, implying that the chaos is not merely a backdrop but the catalyst for the official's venality, a causal relationship Aristophanes sharpens through the juxtaposition of the violent participle with the mundane verb of bribery (καταδωροδοκεῖται).

363. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-7

Line 363

ἐξ Αἰγίνης Θωρυκίων ὢν εἰκοστολόγος κακοδαίμων,
The phrase 'ἐξ Αἰγίνης' combined with 'Θωρυκίων' refers to the deme of Thoricos on Aegina, a detail that is crucial for identifying the specific social and political standing of the speaker, who is likely a metic or a citizen of a specific deme rather than Athens proper. The term 'εἰκοστολόγος' is a technical administrative title referring to a collector of the two percent tax on imports and exports, a role often held by metics or public slaves, which here serves as a specific marker of the character's humble or servile status within the Athenian economy. The combination of these elements creates a precise prosopographical sketch that would be lost without knowledge of the Athenian fiscal system and the deme system.

367. mvp-tlg0019-tlg009-sanjaya-com-eng1-8

Line 367

ἢ τοὺς μισθοὺς τῶν ποιητῶν ῥήτωρ ὢν εἶτʼ ἀποτρώγει,
The phrase ῥήτωρ ὢν (being a rhetor) is not merely descriptive but functions as a pointed ironic contrast to the subject's identity as a poet. In the context of the *Ranae*, Aristophanes satirizes the figure of the 'new' orator (likely targeting a contemporary like Hyperbolus or the general rhetorical shift in Athens) who, by encroaching on the poetic sphere or its patronage, commits a sort of intellectual gluttony. The verb ἀποτρώγει (devours/consumes) is used metaphorically here to suggest the orator is 'eating up' the poets' wages or perhaps the poets themselves, a vivid image of the orator's predatory nature in the competitive landscape of late 5th-century Athenian public life.