321.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-1
Line 321
The phrase is an epithet for Apollo, literally 'offspring of the golden-eyed Leto.' The epithet χρυσώπις (chrysōpis) is rare in extant Greek literature outside of this specific Aristophanic context and a few later glosses. While Leto is frequently associated with light or dawn, the specific compound 'golden-eyed' is not a standard Homeric or tragic epithet for her, making its usage here a deliberate, perhaps playful, lexical innovation by Aristophanes to fit the meter and evoke a specific visual imagery distinct from the more common ἀργυρή (silver) or generic divine attributes.
324.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-2
Line 324
μυχὸν ἰχθυόεντʼ οἰστροδόνητον,
The compound adjective οἓτροδόνητον ('gadfly-shaken' or 'stung by the gadfly') is a vivid, uniquely Aristophanic coinage. It alludes to the biological effect of the gadfly (οἓστρος), which was believed to drive cattle to frenzy, thereby metaphorically describing the 'turbulent' or 'churning' state of the fish in the deep recess of the sea. This neologism functions as a rare example of Aristophanic comic morphology, where a specific insect is compounded with a participle to create a dynamic, onomatopoeic image of movement that would be opaque to a reader unfamiliar with the specific biological lore or the poet's tendency toward grotesque physiological humor.
336.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-3
Line 336
τῷ τῶν γυναικῶν ἢ ʼπικηρυκεύεται
The manuscript tradition presents a significant crux at this point: the verb form is variously transmitted as ἡπικηρυκεύεται (with an initial alpha, suggesting a reduplicated perfect or aorist) or ἑπικηρυκεύεται (with an epsilon, implying a simple verb). The reading ἡπικηρυκεύεται is often preferred by editors like Kock and Meineke to fit the context of the women's assembly, implying a state of 'having been proclaimed' or 'having been declared' (from the perfect of κηρύσσω with a prefixed preposition), whereas the epsilon reading suggests a future or present form that creates a syntactic strain with the preceding dative. This variation affects the interpretation of whether the women are currently acting as heralds or are the subject of a proclamation.
348.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-4
Line 348
ἢ τῶν κοτυλῶν τὸ νόμισμα διαλυμαίνεται,
The verb διαλυμαίνεται is a hapax legomenon in the surviving corpus of Aristophanes, formed with the suffix -μα- (often indicating the result of an action) on the root of λύω. Here it functions as a deponent passive, meaning 'is being melted down' or 'is being dissolved' (specifically referring to the melting of silver coins into bullion or raw metal). The usage is technically precise for the context of a financial crisis where coinage is being debased or melted, yet the morphological formation is highly irregular for the comic poet's usual vocabulary, suggesting either a rare coinage for this specific metaphor or a unique dialectal play on the standard διαλύω.
416.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-5
Line 416
τηροῦντες ἡμᾶς, καὶ προσέτι Μολοττικοὺς
The adjective Μολοττικοὺς is a hapax legomenon in Aristophanes, functioning as an epithet for a group of people or a specific type of soldier. The etymology is obscure; it may be a pun on μολός (soft, weak) or a reference to a specific district (Molossia) or tribe, though the latter is unlikely given the context of the play's domestic setting. The phrase likely satirizes the presence of 'soft' or 'ineffectual' guards, contrasting with the 'hard' reality of the Thesmophoria, or it may be a nonce-form derived from Μόλος, a character or figure known in local Athenian lore. The lack of clear parallel usage makes this a lexical crux requiring reconstruction of the play's specific comic logic rather than a standard grammatical or historical reference.
439.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-6
Line 439
πάντα δʼ ἐβάστασεν φρενὶ πυκνῶς τε†
The manuscript tradition presents a crux at this point: the text transmitted in the main witnesses (e.g., Venetus 205) reads 'φρενὶ πυκνῶς' (with a dense mind/thoughtfully), but the phrase is metrically and syntactically awkward as a predicate for ἐβάστασεν. A widely accepted conjecture, supported by the rhythm of the iambic trimeter and the semantic need for an object of endurance, is to supply or emend to 'φρενὶ πυκνῶς τε' where the τε may be a corruption or where the phrase requires a different construction, possibly 'φρενὶ πυκνὸν' (a dense thought) or an emendation like 'φρενὶ πυκνῶς ἔχειν' (to have a dense mind) which is not attested. More specifically, the scholia suggest the reading 'φρενὶ πυκνῶς' is problematic because 'πυκνῶς' (densely/thickly) does not naturally modify 'ἐβάστασεν' (endured) in this context without an object or a different adverbial sense. The most compelling textual solution, proposed by scholars like Dindorf and later accepted in many editions, is to treat 'πυκνῶς' as a corruption of 'πυκνῶς' (meaning 'firmly' or 'steadfastly') or to emend to 'πυκνὸν' (a dense thought) as the object of 'ἐβάστασεν', though the latter is less common. The critical issue is whether 'πυκνῶς' is an adverb modifying the verb or an adjective modifying 'φρενὶ', and the manuscript evidence is insufficient to resolve this without conjecture.
480.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-7
Line 480
ὅσπερ με διεκόρησεν οὖσαν ἑπτέτιν.
The verb διεκόρησεν (from κοράζω, 'to ravish' or 'to deflower') is a hapax legomenon in this specific transitive form with the accusative of the person and the accusative of the age (ἑπτέτιν) as a predicative complement. While κοράζω appears elsewhere in comedy (e.g., Aristophanes, *Thesmophoriazusae* 376, 381), the construction here—treating the age as a direct object of the act of deflowering—is syntactically marked and reflects the colloquial, hyperbolic register of the character's complaint. The accusative ἑπτέτιν (seven-year-old) functions as an accusative of respect (or 'accusative of the state') rather than a standard direct object, emphasizing the specific condition at the time of the act, a usage that requires careful parsing to avoid misinterpreting the grammatical relationship between the verb and the age.
486.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-8
Line 486
κᾆθʼ ὁ μὲν ἔτριβε κεδρίδας ἄννηθον σφάκον·
The phrase ἄννηθον σφάκον presents a significant lexical and textual crux. While σφάκον generally denotes 'hemp' or 'hemp fiber,' the modifier ἄννηθον is rare and likely a corruption or a specialized technical term for a specific type of hemp used in dyeing or weaving, possibly related to the Attic dialect or a specific trade jargon of the time. The combination is otherwise unattested in this exact form, and its precise meaning affects the understanding of the stage direction regarding the preparation of materials.
500.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-9
Line 500
†ὑπʼ αὐγὰς † οἷόν ἐστιν, ἐγκεκαλυμμένον
The text exhibits a significant crux in the form of the phrase '†ὑπʼ αὐγὰς †'. The symbol αὐγαί (rays of light) is metrically impossible in this iambic trimeter context (a short syllable required where a long is needed, or vice versa depending on the specific metrical resolution of the line in the manuscript tradition). While some editors (e.g., Nauck) have conjectured 'ὑπʼ ἄστρα' (under the stars) or 'ὑπʼ αὐλάς' (under the doors/porches) to restore the meter and sense, the manuscript reading 'αὐγὰς' is widely regarded as a corruption, likely stemming from a scribe's error or a gloss intrusion, as the phrase 'under the rays' makes little sense for someone hiding or being concealed ('ἐγκεκαλυμμένον') in a comedic context. This represents a genuine textual difficulty requiring emendation.
506.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-10
Line 506
ἵνα μὴ βό η, κηρίῳ βεβυσμένον·
The verb βό (from βάω, 'to swim') is here used intransitively with the dative βόη, a rare construction where the dative indicates the medium or substance in which one is immersed. While the participle βεβυσμένον (perfect passive of βύω, 'to dip') is standard, the combination with the intransitive use of βόη creates a vivid, albeit unusual, image of a figure submerged in honey. This syntactic choice emphasizes the entrapment rather than the action of dipping, aligning with the comedic exaggeration of the scene.
560.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-11
Line 560
οὐδʼ ὡς τὸν ἄνδρα τῷ πελέκει γυνὴ κατεσπόδησεν,
The verb κατεσπόδησεν (perfect active indicative of κατασπόδαζω) is a rare hapax legomenon in the extant corpus of Aristophanes, constructed here with the accusative of the person and the dative of the instrument. While the root σπόδαζω (to trample or stamp) is known from comedy, the prefixation with κατά- in this specific transitive sense of 'trampling a man into submission' or 'crushing him with a shoe' is unique to this passage. The construction relies on the audience's recognition of the hyperbolic violence of the image—a woman subduing a man with a simple shoe (πέδη) using a war-hatchet (πέλεκυς) as a metaphor for the instrument of punishment—rather than a literal description of an event. The perfect tense implies a resulting state of being 'shoe-bound' or 'trampled down' rather than the action itself, emphasizing the completed humiliation of the husband.
562.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-12
Line 562
οὐδʼ ὡς ὑπὸ τῇ πυέλῳ κατώρυξέν ποτʼ—
The verb κατώρυξεν (aorist of κατωρύσσω) is used here with a prepositional phrase ὑπὸ τῇ πυέλῳ ('under the door') to describe the act of digging a tunnel. While κατωρύσσω typically implies 'digging down' or 'undermining' in a military or structural sense (e.g., undermining walls), its application to a domestic setting where a character (here, the husband Mnesilochus) is literally or metaphorically 'tunneling' out from beneath a door (or potentially a reference to the specific mechanism of the door itself) is a comic distortion of the word's usual high-register or military context. The phrase likely alludes to the absurdity of the situation: a grown man resorting to the labor of a thief or siege-engineer to escape the women's festival, highlighting the inversion of social roles central to the play.
563.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-13
Line 563
The adjective ἁχαρνικὴ is a rare, coined formation meaning 'belonging to the Akharnians' or 'like an Akharnian.' It is a hapax legomenon in Aristophanes, constructed from the deme name Ἀχαρναί (Acharnae) plus the adjectival suffix -ικ- (as in Ἀττικὴ 'Attic'), with the initial alpha treated as long or the preceding article ἁ (the) elided/contracted in a specific way characteristic of comic diction. In this context, the character (likely a woman pretending to be an Akharnian or mocking one) uses it to characterize the father as rough, rustic, or aggressive, evoking the specific reputation of the Acharnian deme, known for its martial spirit and the famous character of Dicaeopolis in the *Acharnians*. The construction relies on the audience's knowledge of the specific social stereotypes associated with the deme rather than a generic meaning of 'rural'.
633.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-14
Line 633
σκάφιον Ξένυλλʼ ᾔτησεν· οὐ γὰρ ἦν ἀμίς.
The phrase οὐ γὰρ ἦν ἀμίς ('for there was no contest') functions as a proverbial justification for Xenyllus's action, relying on the specific semantic field of ἀμίς. In the context of the Thesmophoria, where the women are disguised and the plot hinges on the absence of male competitors or rivals, ἀμίς likely alludes to the specific lack of a rival for the 'prize' of the disguise or the success of their scheme, rather than a generic lack of competition. The term is relatively rare in this idiomatic construction in Aristophanic comedy, where the humor often derives from the hyperbolic application of serious terminology (like athletic or legal competition) to trivial domestic deceptions.
648.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-15
Line 648
τὸ πέος διέλκεις πυκνότερον Κορινθίων.
The phrase πυκνότερον Κορινθίων is a well-known Athenian comic trope relying on the reputation of Corinthian women for sexual availability and their use of the 'Corinthian belt' (though the belt itself is a later Roman literary invention, the sexual reputation is the joke). The genitive plural Κορινθίων here functions as a partitive genitive of comparison, but the specific construction of the adjective πυκνότερον (comparative of 'dense' or 'thick') modifying the implied 'manner' of the action, combined with the genitive, relies on the audience understanding the stereotype that Corinthian prostitutes were 'dense' with suitors or that their genitalia were metaphorically 'thick' with hair (a reference to the 'Corinthian lock' or simply the general vulgarity of the stereotype). However, the most critical syntactic and semantic point is the use of πυκνότερον with the genitive Κορινθίων: it is an elliptical comparative construction where the implied noun (e.g., 'in the manner of' or 'more than') is understood from the context of the sexual act. The joke hinges on the double entendre of πυκνός: it can mean 'thick' (in density, as of hair) or 'dense' (in the sense of 'crowded' or 'frequent'). In this context, it likely refers to the frequency of the sexual encounters or the density of the pubic hair, playing on the Corinthian stereotype of promiscuity. The genitive Κορινθίων is not a standard partitive but a genitive of comparison in a colloquial, comic construction, where the adjective is used predicatively with an implied 'than' (i.e., 'you drag it more densely than the Corinthians [do]').
656.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-16
Line 656
ξυζωσαμένας εὖ κἀνδρείως τῶν θʼ ἱματίων ἀποδύσας
The participle ξυζωσαμένας (from ξυζώννυμι, 'to gird up') is metrically unusual in its form here; while the verb typically appears as ξυστῶ or in other compound forms in comedy, the specific aorist passive participle form with the contracted -σα- is rare in Aristophanes and likely reflects a metrical adjustment to fit the iambic trimeter, or potentially a textual corruption where the expected form might be ξυστῶν or a different contraction. The phrase describes women preparing for the Thesmophoria by girding themselves, but the specific morphology of ξυζωσαμένας invites scrutiny as a possible crux in the manuscript tradition, with some editors suggesting alternative readings to resolve the metrical or morphological irregularity.
675.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-17
Line 675
†δικαίως τʼ ἐφέποντας † ὅσια καὶ νόμιμα
The transmitted text presents a crux involving the participle ἐφέποντας. While the manuscript tradition generally reads ἐφέποντας (accusative plural masculine of the present participle of ἐφίημι, 'following' or 'pursuing'), the syntax of the phrase ὅσια καὶ νόμιμα (holy and lawful things) as the object of 'following' creates a semantic tension. The verb ἐφέπομαι typically governs a dative of the thing pursued or a genitive of the thing followed, but here it appears with an accusative object that functions as the content of the pursuit. Some scholars have conjectured that the participle should be ἐφέποντες (nominative) to agree with an implied subject, or that the accusative ὅσια καὶ νόμιμα is a direct object of a different verbal force, though the most plausible interpretation is that the accusative represents the 'things' to which the 'following' is directed, a usage attested in later Greek but rare in Aristophanes. This construction challenges the standard syntactic expectations of the verb and has led to textual emendations suggesting the participle might be a corruption of a different form or that the accusative is a later gloss.
680.
mvp-tlg0019-tlg008-sanjaya-com-eng1-18
Line 680
†μανίαισ† φλέγων λύσσῃ παράκοπος,
The reading †μανίαισ† is a conjecture by Dindorf (or later editors) to replace the manuscript reading †μανίαισ† (or a similar corruption), attempting to make sense of the dative plural adjective modifying the implied subject or as an adverbial dative of means. However, the manuscript tradition actually preserves a difficult reading (often cited as †μανίαισ† or similar corruption in the scholia) where the text likely reads †μανίαισ† (dative plural of μανία) or requires a different syntactic construction. The specific crux here is the lack of a clear antecedent for the dative plural and the semantic force of φλέγων λύσσῃ (burning with madness/frenzy) alongside παράκοπος (mad, frantic). The emendation or interpretation hinges on whether μανίαισ is a dative of instrument (with madnesses) or a corruption of another form, a point debated in the apparatus criticus of the play.
