Aristophanes Clouds 392

William James Hickie (Translator)

View: By Card

Clouds. Aristophanes. William James Hickie (Translator). London. 1853.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The Annenberg CPB/Project.

Current edition Perseus

Clouds (English) (Aristophanes. The Comedies of Aristophanes, Vol. I. Hickie, William James, translator. Bohn: London, 1853.)

Editions (1)
Νεφέλαι Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 1. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906.) — 392 focus
Translations (1)
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 392 focus

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

392. mvp-tlg0019-tlg003-sanjaya-com-eng1-28

Line 392

σκέψαι τοίνυν ἀπὸ γαστριδίου τυννουτουὶ οἷα πέπορδας·
The phrase γαστριδίου τυννουτουὶ is a striking example of Aristophanic comic hyperbole and linguistic play. The adjective τυννουτουὶ (or τυννουτός) is a hapax legomenon in this exact form, derived from τύννος (tuna), effectively meaning 'tuna-like' or 'swollen like a tuna.' Coupled with γαστριδίου (little belly), the image suggests a belly distended to the grotesque proportions of a tuna, a common metaphor in Old Comedy for gluttony or the bloated state of the poor or the sophists (who are often mocked for their 'full' but empty heads). This construction relies on the reader's familiarity with the culinary and zoological associations of the tuna in Athenian diet and the specific comedic tradition of using fish imagery to describe bodily excess.

409. mvp-tlg0019-tlg003-sanjaya-com-eng1-29

Line 409

ὀπτῶν γαστέρα τοῖς συγγενέσιν, κᾆτʼ οὐκ ἔσχων ἀμελήσας·
The participle ἀμελήσας (aorist active) with the negative οὐκ functions here as a causal or explanatory adjunct to the main verb ἔσχων, implying 'not having [the money], having neglected [to prepare it]'. While the aorist participle with οὐκ is common, the specific causal force here, combined with the implied object of ἀμελήσας (the preparation of the roasted meat for the relatives), highlights a characterological detail of the speaker's improvidence. This construction avoids a finite clause (e.g., οὐκ ἔσχων ὅτι ἠμέλησε) to maintain the rapid, colloquial rhythm typical of Aristophanic dialogue, forcing the reader to infer the causal link between the lack of funds and the prior neglect.