Aristophanes Acharnians 454

Anonymous (Translator)

Acharnians. Aristophanes. Anonymous (Translator). New York. 192?.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Current edition Experimental

Acharnians (OCR draft) (English) (English (Anonymous; Liveright, 192?). Migrated from Perseus legacy XML; source wording and notes retained. See TEI header and migration inventory.)

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Ἀχαρνῆς Perseus (Aristophanes. Aristophanis Comoediae, Vol. 1. Hall, F. W. and Geldart, William M., editors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906.) — 490-625 focus
Translations (1)
English (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) Experimental (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) — 454 focus

Notes on the current edition

Acharnians

1. Report said that Euripides' mother had sold vegetables on the market.
2. Aristophanes means, of course, to imply that the whole talent of Euripides lay in these petty details of stage property.

Commentary

Commentary (Sanjaya, generated; selected passages) (OCR draft) (Source: pnadelofficial/aristophanes-sanjaya, commit c319590c139e5603e71f0699caa0663d823af8ad. Machine-generated source annotations retained; see Sanjaya import audit for coverage and limitations.) focus

480. mvp-tlg0019-tlg001-sanjaya-com-eng1-14

Line 480

ὦ θύμʼ ἄνευ σκάνδικος ἐμπορευτέα.
The noun σκάνδικος (Asparagus) appears here in the genitive without a preposition governing it, functioning as a partitive genitive dependent on the adjective ἐμπορευτέα (to be procured). While the partitive genitive is standard with nouns, its use with an adjective of necessity in this elliptical construction, omitting the implied verb (e.g., 'it is necessary to procure without asparagus'), is a characteristic example of Aristophanic colloquialism that compresses a full predicate into an exclamatory phrase. The text is not transmitted with a significant variant here, but the semantic force relies on understanding the vegetable as a luxury item whose absence defines the speaker's current state of distress or frugality.