Notes on the current edition
Letters
1.
Eight citations of this letter by Hermogenes, Aristeides and others may be found in Walz’s
Rhetores Graeci. It is also cited by Harpocration and by Antiatticista in Bekker’s
Anecdota. It seems to have been known also to Photius and to the author of the
Etymologicum Magnum. References to all of these will be found in the footnotes. In spite of these evidences of authenticity the majority of editors reject the letter. By Blass it is defended and of all six letters it certainly has the strongest case.
2.
Lycurgus managed the finances of
efficiently for twelve years (338-326), for one legal term of four years as treasurer and for two terms through others. During this period the income of the State was doubled and a large building program was carried through. In politics Lycurgus was associated with Demosthenes. Though he ranked as one of the ten Attic orators, his style was rather forceful than polished. One speech,
Against Leocrates, is extant and his Life in Ps.
Plut. Vit. 10 Orat.
, whose author seems to have made extensive use of the decree in his honor,
I.G. 2. 456. Cf. also
I.G. 2. 333,
1493-1496.
3.
The Macedonians.
4.
The surrender of Lycurgus, along with that of Demosthenes and others, was demanded after the fall of
in
335 B.C. Alexander was persuaded by the Athenian orator Demades to relent.
5.
In addition to offices of trust Lycurgus several times received the honor of a crown and of statues at the public expense.
6.
There was a board of thirty men at
who acted as accountants and auditors. Ten of the thirty were called
εὔθυνοι; any official who handled public money could be charges before them with bribery or misappropriation of funds. All accounts were subject to their inspection. Cf.
Aristot. Ath. Pol. 48.3-4
;
Aristot. Ath. Pol. 53.2
.
7.
The battle of
,
338 B.C.; the Greeks magnified its importance. Their liberty was lost by degrees, not suddenly.
8.
An Athenian citizen was identified by three items: his own name, his father’s name, and his deme.
9.
Antiatticista cites this passage under
ἀξία· ἀντὶ τοῦ ἀξίωμα Bekker, 1. p. 77. 17-18.
Ἀξία equals Latin dignitas, the degree of distinction possessed by virtue of birth or achievement or both.
10.
The precise accusation is not known; it seems to have been concerned with the administration of the treasury.
11.
Moerocles was archon in
324 B.C. His surrender had been demanded by Alexander in
335 B.C., which indicates his importance.
12.
Nothing specific is known about these imprisonments, but it need not be assumed that all four men were under sentence at a single time. See next note. Taureas and Pataecus are unknown. For Aristogeiton see the two speeches against him.
13.
If Moerocles ordered the two sons of Lycurgus to be imprisoned but left Taureas, Pataecus and Aristogeiton at liberty, the charge against him is criminal partiality. If he denies that he was archon at the time and so lacked the authority to order these men to be detained in prison, then the minor charge still stands against him of addressing the Assembly while technically a prisoner himself. As a prisoner he would be subject to partial
ἀτιμία or diminution of his rights as a citizen.
14.
At times the Athenian Assembly bestowed extravagant gifts upon the children of famous men, as may be learned from
Plut. Arist. 27
. At other times it acted heartlessly, if we may believe
Dem. 19.280
ff. Archinus was one of the restorers of democracy in
403 B.C., but the greater share of the credit went to Thrasybulus.
15.
That is, with the Macedonian court.
16.
Laches is known from an inscription as a syndic of the deme Aexonê (I.G. 2.
1197, p. 560, 13 f.).
17.
Mnesibulus is not otherwise known.
18.
Of the Macedonians.
19.
A verbal play on
χάριτες,
feelings of gratitude or
Graces.
20.
Pytheas was a presumptuous politician of no formal education; he accused Demosthenes of receiving twenty talents from Harpalus; after Alexander’s death he joined Antipater during the siege of
,
322 B.C.
21.
The Greek word
φθόη was peculiar enough to prick the interest of Harpocration, who cites this passage.
22.
The point is that Pytheas himself lacked ancestors of note.
23.
That is, death by disease.
24.
Nausicles and Diotimus are mentioned in the
Dem. 18.114
; both are known from inscriptions to have held important commands. The surrender of Diotimus was demanded by Alexander in
335 B.C. Chares held important commands between 367 and
335 B.C. Menestheus was given command of one hundred galleys in
335 B.C., 17. 20. Eudoxus seems to be otherwise unknown.
25.
Din. 1.33
names Euthydicus as one whom Demosthenes claimed as a friend. Ephialtes was one of the ten whose surrender was demanded by Alexander in
335 B.C. He died in 334 while fighting on the side of the Persians against the Macedonians. For Lycurgus see above sect. 2 note.
26.
For Charidemus, leader of mercenaries, see
Dem. 23
, Introduction. There is extant a speech of Deinarchus
Against Philocles (
Din. Phil.
). The latter was associated with Demosthenes in admitting Harpalus to
with his illicit treasure. His exile was brief.
27.
This is one of several similar colloquialisms signifying
I don’t mind.
28.
Antiatticista cites this passage under
ἐργολάβος Bekker’s
Anecdota 1. p. 94. 3-4.
29.
In this passage there is a running play of words based upon the common expression
ἐκ τῆς περιουσίας,
out of one’s abundance. Note
περίεστι . . . ἐκ τοῦ περιόντος . . . περίεστι . . . περιγένοιτο
30.
Harpocration cites this passage under the verb
ἐρανίζω. Photius and the
Etymologicum Magnum cite the verb only.
31.
Cf.
Dem. 18.13
ἐν ἐπηρείας τάξει καὶ φθόνου,
by way of spite and jealousy. For the meaning cf. sect. 41 of this letter.
32.
It was the law at
that the amount of a debt owed to the State should be doubled if not paid when due. Demosthenes had made a bad loan, which rendered it impossible to pay his fine of fifty talents.
33.
See
Dem. L. 3.39
by way of an ordinance of gratitude and magnanimity on your part.
34.
Demosthenes was condemned to be held in prison until his fine should be paid; he insists that he must enjoy liberty if he is to collect the funds necessary for payment.
35.
According to
Plut. Dem. 26
, the orator himself moved that the charges should be referred to the Areopagus, which promptly condemned him.
36.
Aristogeiton was acquitted, according to Demosthenes, upon the same evidence. See
Dem. L. 3.37
.
37.
Eight references to this passage may be found in Walz’s
Rhetores Graeci, which has an index.
38.
This advice for children was possibly a commonplace. It is voiced by
Epicurus,
Vatican Collection 62
.