Homer Iliad 21.468

ed. Robert Southey

View: By Book

Iliad. Homer. ed. Robert Southey. London. 1847.

Sponsored by Tufts University.

Current edition Experimental

English (William Cowper, 1791, ed. Southey) (OCR draft) (English) (English (William Cowper, 1791, ed. Southey))

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Ἰλιάς Perseus (Homer. Homeri Opera, Volumes 1-2. Monro, D. B. (David Binning), editor; Allen, Thomas W. (Thomas William), editor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908-1920.) — 21.468 focus
Translations (8)
Iliad Perseus (Homer. The Iliad, Volume 1-2. Murray, A. T. (Augustus Taber), translator. London: William Heinmann; New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1924-1925.) — 21.468 focus
Iliad Perseus (Homer. The Iliad of Homer, rendered into English prose for the use of those who cannot read the original. Butler, Samuel, 1835-1902, translator. London: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1898.) — 21.502 focus
English (Butler, rev. Nagy et al., 2020) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Butler, rev. Nagy et al., 2020)) — 21.468 focus
He turned away as he spoke, for he would lay no hand on the brother of his own father. [470] But his sister the huntress Artemis, patroness of wild beasts, was very angry with him and said, “So you would flee, Far-Darter, and hand victory over to Poseidon with a cheap vaunt to boot. Baby, why keep your bow thus idle? [475] Never let me again hear you bragging in my father’s house, as you have often done in the presence of the immortals, that you would stand up and fight with Poseidon.”
English (William Cullen Bryant, 1870) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (William Cullen Bryant, 1870)) — 21.468 focus
English (Alexander Pope, 1720, ed. Watson, 1857) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Alexander Pope, 1720, ed. Watson, 1857)) — 21.468 focus
Then turns his face, far beaming heavenly fires,
And from the senior power submiss retires;
Him, thus retreating, Artemis upbraids,
545
The quiver'd huntress of the sylvan shades:
English (Thomas Hobbes, 1667, ed. Molesworth 1843) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Thomas Hobbes, 1667, ed. Molesworth 1843)) — 21.468 focus
English (George Chapman, 1611, ed. Hooper 1857) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (George Chapman, 1611, ed. Hooper 1857)) — 21.468 focus
English (F. W. Newman, 1856) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (F. W. Newman, 1856)) — 21 focus

New Alexandria Commentaries

Douglas Frame

in a list of occurrences of the phrase thanatoi…halōnai in Homer, in the context of analyzing the meaning of the phrase in contrast with me nesei

source

analysis of original notion of verb halṓō, “to be seized by death”

source

example of opposition between verbs pheúgein and halonai. Compare to Il. XIV.81

source
Gregory Nagy

The momentum of Achilles continues to heat up. The Trojans are now retreating as fast as they can, heading back toward Troy to find safety there within the sacred walls of that ancient citadel. In their hurry to get away from the field of battle, their hasty retreat has quickly turned into a chaotic and humiliating rout. Achilles is right behind them, in hot pursuit, slaughtering left and right the fleeing Trojans. The hero seems unstoppable. But Achilles meets his match when he provokes the river god Scamander, whose clear streams he has polluted with the gore of countless Trojans that he slaughters while they are desperately attempting to ford the god’s river.

draft js image errorCopperplate etching (1795) by Tommaso Piroli, after a drawing (1793) by John Flaxman. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

source

Outraged by all the carnage caused by Achilles as that hero relentlessly keeps slaughtering droves of Trojans and clogs the river with their bloody corpses, Scamander as the divine embodiment of the river rises up with all his watery might and proceeds to fight Achilles one-on-one. What follows is an epitome from HQ 145–146. We know that ancient Greek narratives about hostile encounters between heroes and river gods can traditionally picture the river as taking the shape of a ferocious beast: a prime example is Archilochus F 286-287 (ed. West), where the hero Hēraklēs fights with the river god Akhelōios, who has taken on the shape of a raging bull. We may contrast the treatment of the fight between the hero Achilles and the river god Scamander here in Iliad 21, where the river Scamander does not take the shape of a bull and is not even theriomorphic: rather, the narrative opts for a variant tradition highlighting the elemental aspect of the river, as water personified, struggling with a hero whose ally, as we are about to see, will be the god Hephaistos in his role as fire personified. It has been argued, partly on the authority of the scholia for I.21.237, that the Archilochean representation is pre-Homeric. But it is enough for now to say that the Archilochean representation stems from a tradition that is independent of Homer. And the Homeric narrative goes out of its way to make an indirect reference to the other tradition. The river god Scamander, in the heat of battle with the hero Achilles, is described at I.21.237 as ‘bellowing like a bull’ (μεμυκὼς ἠύτε ταῦρος). The simile amounts to a conscious acknowledgment of a variant tradition. Finally the river god, after a lengthy struggle, is starting to overwhelm Achilles, and now this main hero of the Iliad finds himself in danger of getting swept away, cut off from all epic memory, in the flooding streams of the enraged Scamander.

source

reference to Reeve’s contention that Aristarchus’ use of perissós could have rested on documentary evidence (Reeve 1972.250). These three lines are examples of athetesis that rests on documentary evidence

source

passage adduced by Socrates at Protagoras 340a

source

In order to save the endangered Achilles, Hērā now induces her son Hephaistos to join the fray and to fight actively against the river god Scamander. Since Hephaistos is god of fire, he is the elemental antithesis of Scamander as god of water, that is, as the local god who embodies the principal river that waters the plain of Troy. So now the fight between fiery hero and streaming god escalates into a cosmic conflict between the elements of fire and water. In the end, then, fire wins over water, but now Hērā induces Hephaistos to stop his fight with Scamander.

source

one of Watkin’s three passages where menos is used as a functional equivalent of mēnis

source

Following up on the combat between Hephaistos and Scamander, other gods now also join in the fight, and, the next thing you know, the cosmic conflict between the elemental forces of fire and water is transformed into a personalized brawl between divine partisans of Trojans and Achaeans. The personalization intensifies to the point of becoming ludicrous, and, once such a point is reached, the whole scene becomes an exquisite exercise in divine burlesque. As Walter Burkert (1960:132) has observed, however, such a comic form is not innovative but archaizing, and there are numerous parallels to be found in the myths and rituals of ancient Near Eastern civilizations; this observation applies also to the divine burlesque that characterizes other narrative sequences Homeric poetry, most notably in Odyssey 8 and in Iliad 1 as well as here in Iliad 21—and in the Homeric Hymns.

source
Leonard Muellner

examples of the identical contexts in which eukhos and kudos occur

source

in a list of passages exemplifying the complementary metrical distribution of eukhos and kudos

source

comparison of eukhos and kudos, and here specifically analysis of the phraseology surrounding them that is paralleled by only kleos

source

analysis of the meaning and uses of piphauskesthai (in the context of analyzing the semantic and formal confusion of piphaskein and piphauskesthai), in this verse as ‘show, reveal’

source

in a list of examples of eukhesthai einai + comparative/superlative (regarding physical prowess, physical beauty, prestige), and analysis of the lexical change in the eukhesthai einai formula in these verses

source

analysis of the reason for Poseidon’s hatred against Trojans as different from that of Hera and Athena (although listed together in I.24.025-030)

source

analysis of the reason for Poseidon’s hatred against Trojans as different from that of Hera and Athena (although listed together in I.24.025-030)

source

an example of eukhos associated with secular eukhesthai

source

analysis of the sacral-secular split in formulas with akouein and eukhesthai and where these words occur not in the same verse but with enjambment

source

one of Corlu’s examples of eukhesthai referring to past actions

source

in a list of secular eukhesthai reporting speech (absolute usage)

source

in a list of usages contextually parallel to the death-eukhesthai usage, in the context of the analysis of section II attestations, i.e. secular eukhesthai reporting speech (absolute usage)

source

analysis of the simile of the devastation Achilles wreaks, where the hero with mēnis is a hero like mēnis

source

analysis of the theme of biē as elemental, and here specifically the representation of Achilles’ biē as parallel to that of the cosmic aspect of biē (as manifested in the thunderstorm of Zeus/affected by the anger of gods)

source

analysis of the similarity of the language and syntax of the simile and the description of Achilles’ mēnis in the prologue to the Iliad

source

in a list of passages exemplifying the complementary metrical distribution of eukhos and kudos

source
Richard Martin

At 21.286, Athena and Poseidon pledge faith to Achilles: "Taking hand in hand they pledged faith by means of words (epeessin)." The focus is on speech as a social bonding mechanism, the equivalent of a handshake—an affirmation between helping divinities and Achilles. The parallel between verbal and physical gesture is highlighted in this instance of the hand-and-word formula (Martin 1993:19).

source

Three exchanges between gods in Book 21 illustrate the versatile social function of remembering and reminding within the context of rebukes. Spoken in a tone of defiance, the words "Don't you remember" introduce a threat. Ares, in a flyting muthos (21.393), asks Athena, "Don't you recall when you drove Diomedes, son of Tydeus, to wounding, and yourself thrust at me, grasping the spear all could see?" (21.396-98). Ares turns his earlier injury into a cause for action, in language resembling a legal formulation: "Therefore I now think you will repay me as much as you have done" (21.399). A short while later, Poseidon rebukes Apollo with this phrase in a gentler manner, leading Apollo by the reminder of Laomedon's treachery to offer an elegiac dismissal of fighting for humankind (21.441-45). And Artemis deploys a third memory to say threateningly, "May I never hear you boasting—as you did before among immortal gods—that you fight face-to-face Poseidon" (21.471). To deny that an addressee has been consistently heroic is to constrain his further fame (Martin 1993:83).

For the broader analysis of memory as a muthos genre, see the comment on Iliad 1.259-274.

References

Martin, R. P. 1993. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca.

source