Alfred Chilton Pearson Ichneutae 4

ed. Alfred Chilton Pearson

Ichneutae. Alfred Chilton Pearson. ed. Alfred Chilton Pearson. . 2026-09-15.

Current edition Experimental

Commentary (A. C. Pearson, 1917; OCR review) (OCR draft) (English) (Commentary (A. C. Pearson, 1917; OCR review))

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Greek (A. S. Hunt, 1912; Perseus reference) (OCR draft) Experimental (Greek (A. S. Hunt, 1912; Perseus reference)) — 1 focus
Translations (1)
English (Anne Mahoney, adapted from Walker) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Anne Mahoney, adapted from Walker)) — 1 focus

Commentary

Commentary (A. C. Pearson, 1917; OCR review) (OCR draft) (Commentary (A. C. Pearson, 1917; OCR review)) focus

mvp-comment-119-1 227 f. are not easy to restore. The sentence appears to be constructed similarly to Rhes. 875 οὐ γὰρ ἐς σὲ τείνεται | γλῶσσ᾽, ὡς σὺ κομπεῖς. Hence I was inclined to read αἰτίαι φωρῶν κάτα | γλώσσης ἐτείνοντ' ἐς κλοπὴν ἠνιγμέναι (or τετραμμέναι), but αἰτίαι is impossible and ἐτείνο[ ντ'] ἐς is barely consistent with the traces. Hunt thought that the letter before αι was κ (i.e. καί), but could not find a suitable word to precede it which might be the subject of ἐτείνετ'. He also believed that εναι was the remnant of a perfect infinitive; but it would be difficult to accommodate one to the context. ἂν appears to be iterative. αὐτις, which the recurrence in 229 makes almost certain ( ἀν' αὐλήν, Murray), is proved to be Attic by the new Menander (Epitr. 362, Sam. 281, 292). See Wila-

mvp-comment-119-2 mowitz in Sitzungsb. k. Pr. Akad., 1907 p. 872. Hitherto it has been treated as Ionic by the authorities (Weir Smyth, Ionic Dialect, p. 298). L gives αὐτις in O. C. 234 and elsewhere, and the editors have perhaps been too hasty in rejecting it. See also fr. 599.