Sophocles Oedipus at Colonus 1192

ed. Lewis Campbell

ἀλλʼ αὐτόν — εἰσὶ χἀτέροις γοναὶ κακαὶ

Oedipus at Colonus. Sophocles. ed. Lewis Campbell. Oxford. 1879.

Current edition Experimental

Greek (Lewis Campbell, 1879) (OCR draft) (Greek) (Greek (Lewis Campbell, 1879))

Provisional text from uncorrected OCR; expect errors.

Editions (1)
Greek (F. Storr, 1912) (OCR draft) Experimental (Greek (F. Storr, 1912)) — 1211-1248 focus
Translations (2)
German (J. J. C. Donner, 1875; OCR review) (OCR draft) Experimental (German (J. J. C. Donner, 1875; OCR review)) — 1181 focus
Wohl bin ich jung, doch, Vater, folge meinem Rath.
Olaß den Mann hier, wie er will, dem eignen Sinn
Genüge leisten und dem Gott gefällig sein,
Und uns gewihre freundlich, daß der Bruder kommt.
1175
Getrost: es zieht dich, was er Unwillkommnes sagt,
Nicht wider deinen Willen ab von deinem Sinn.
Und Worte hören, schadet dir's? Gibt doch die That,
In bösem Sinn entworfen, sich im Worte kund.
Er ist dein Sohn, o Vater; darum, wenn er auch
1180
Der schwersten Frevel schwersten selbst an dir verübt,
Geziemt es dir nicht, wieder ihm ein Leid zu thun.
Nein, laß ihn! Böse Kinder hat auch Mancher sonst,
Und braust im Zorn auf; aber durch den Zauberlaut
Der Freundesmahnung wird gebannt der Ungestüm.
1185
Du wende nunmehr deinen Blick auf jenes Leid,
Das Leid von deinen Eltern, das du duldetest;
Und schaust du hierauf, weiß ich, wird's dir offenbar,
Welch schlimmes Ende schlimmer Zorn zu nehmen liebt.
Denn dessen trägst du Zeichen, mächtig mahnende:
1190
Die blinden Augen, deren Licht in Nacht erlosch.
So gib uns nach! Denn langes Flehen ziemt sich nicht,
Wenn wir Gerechtes bitten, noch geziemt es dir,
Wohlthat empfangen und dafür nicht dankbar sein.
English (Sir Richard Jebb, 1904) (OCR draft) Experimental (English (Sir Richard Jebb, 1904)) — 1211-1245 focus

Commentary

Commentary (R. C. Jebb) (OCR draft) (Commentary (R. C. Jebb))

mvp-comment-856-1 ἀλλ’ αὐτόν· εἰσὶ 1

Commentary (Lewis Campbell, 1879) (OCR draft) (Commentary (Lewis Campbell, 1879)) focus

1192. mvp-comment-641-1 ἀλλ᾿ αὐτόν- The conjecture of the Ist London edition, ἀλλ᾽ ἔασον, has been accepted with various modifications s by by subsequent sub critics. The text is eloquently defended by Mr. Palmer, who observes: 'I think it not quite impossible to understand the brief expression, backed up as it is by the argument which follows, as the language of earnest entreaty, and that the verb is to be supplied by the mind. Antigone had fully presented her request at the commencement of her speech, so that what she then said may be considered as referred to in this short broken sentence, ἀλλ᾿ αὐτόν. Nay, but receive him graciously ... there are others who have had bad sons and fierce anger, and as they have been charmed into gentleness by the soothing persuasion of their friends, so be you. If ἀλλ' αὐτόν were uttered in a tone of earnest entreaty, and the speaker abruptly added what follows, I can conceive that it would be very intelligible, and if so, the touching effect of the entreaty would be heightened by the very fact that the sentence was unfinished. Antigone leaves her father to imagine all she meant to say, and supplies what is wanting in words by the earnestness of her manner and beseeching tone of voice.' There is force in these remarks, though the quotation of parallel examples would be more to the purpose. The MSS. are practically unanimous; but the aposiopesis is all but unique. Cp. however Aesch. Cho. 749 ff., where Schütz and other editors suppose a lacuna. And in this play there are several places where the original construction of a sentence is not carried out. Cp. esp. supr. 421 ff., 531 ff., infr. 1299 ff., 1370 ff., 1669. Comparisons between classical Greek and the New Testament are usually too remote to be of any use; but the language of affection has similarities in every age, and the ellipse in Philemon 12 is curiously parallel-σὺ δὲ αὐτόν (sc. προσλαβοῦ, which is added from the deferred apodosis in the Textus Receptus). The motive in both cases is the same, viz. a delicate tact, which shrinks from uttering the word of command or entreaty, and hastens to urge fresh topics of persuasion. The deferred apodosis is implied in line 1201, ἀλλ' ἡμῖν εἶκε. Cp. Aesch. Cho. 649 ff., where Dindorf supposes a lacuna, σε in Paris A (followed by R) is a gloss of some grammarian who understood the passage as it is explained in Canter's note: Insigne est hoc ἀναπόδοτον, ac singulare. Vult enim hoc dicere, ἀλλ αὐτὸν εἴκειν, καὶ νουθετούμενον ἐξεπάδεσθαι, etc.' For an equally difficult anacoluthon, see Thuc. 5. 22. Qy.

1192. mvp-comment-641-2 ἀλλ᾽ εἶξον (ΑΛΛΑΥΤΟΝ) ? 1193-