Plutarch De Facie Quae in orbe Lunae Apparet 3

Harold Cherniss (Translator), William C. Helmbold (Translator)

De Facie Quae in orbe Lunae Apparet. Plutarch. Harold Cherniss (Translator), William C. Helmbold (Translator). Cambridge, MA. 1957.

Sponsored by Perseus Project, Tufts University.

Funding provided by The National Endowment for the Humanities.

Current edition Perseus

Concerning the Face which Appears in the Orb Of the Moon (English) (Plutarch. Moralia, Vol. XII. Cherniss, Harold and William Clark Helmbold translators. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1957 (printing).)

Editions (1)
Περὶ τοῦ ἐμφαινομένου προσώπου τῷ κύκλῳ τῆς σελήνης Perseus (Plutarch. Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia, Vol. V. Vernardakēs, Grēgorios N., editor. Leipzig: Teubner, 1893.) — 3 focus
Translations (1)
Of the Face Appearing Within the Orb Of the Moon Perseus (Plutarch. Plutarch's Morals, Vol. V. Goodwin, William W., editor; G., A., translator. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company; Cambridge: Press of John Wilson and Son, 1874.) — 3 focus

Notes on the current edition

Concerning the Face which Appears in the Orb Of the Moon

1. Similar theories are referred to by Aëtius, ii. 30. 1 ( Dox. Graeci, p. 361 B 10-13) = Stobaeus, Eclogae, i. 26. 4; Lucian, Icaromenippus, § 20; Simplicius, Caelo, p. 457. 15-16. Such a theory is recorded and refuted by Ibn Al-Haitham, the Arabic astronomer of the tenth and eleventh centuries (cf, Schoy’s translation, pp. 1-2 and 5-6). Emperor Rudolph II believed the spots on the moon to be the reflection of Italy and the large Italian islands ( cf. Kepler, Opera Omnia, ii, p. 491 cited by Pixis, Kepler als Geography p. 102); and A. von Humboldt ( Kosmos, iii, p. 544 [Stuttgart, 1850]) tells of a Persian from Ispahan who assured him that what we see in the moon is the map of our earth ( cf. Ebner, Geographische Hinweise und Anklänge in Plutarchs Schrift, de facie, p. 13, n. 3).
2. i.e. in the evenness and polish of its surface.
3. For the rainbow as a reflection of the sun in the cloud cf. Iside, 358 F, Amatorius, 765 E - F (where there is a strong verbal similarity to the present passage), Placitis, 894 C - F (= Aëtius, iii. 5, 3-10 and 11 [ Dox. Graeci, pp. 372-373]). According to Aëtius, iii. 5. 11 ( = Placitis, 894 F) the theory was held by Anaxagoras ( cf. frag. B 19 = ii, p. 41. 8-11 [Diels-Kranz]). It is developed by Aristotle in Meteorology, iii. 4, 373 A 32 375 B 15 ( cf. Areius Didymus’s Epitome, frag. 14 = Dox. Graeci, p. 455.14 ff., and Seneca, Nat. Quaest. i. 3). Diogenes Laertius, vii. 152 cites Posidonius for the definition ἶριν δ’ εἶναι ὡς Ποσειδώνιός φησιν ἔμφασιν ἡλίου τμήματος ἣ ἐν νέφει δεδροσιμένῳ, κοίλῳ καὶ συνεχεῖ πρὸς φαντασίαν, ὡς ἐν κατόpτρῳ φανταζομένην κατὰ κύκλου περιφέρειαν ( cf. Seneca, Nat. Quaest. i. 5. 13); and Adler ( Diss. Phil. Vind. x, pp. 128-129) contends that Posidonius was Plutarch’s source for the formulation of the theory. Plutarch’s oἴεσθ’ ὑμεῖς, however, addressed to Apollonides must be intended to ascribe the theory generally to you mathematicians; and this is confirmed by the passage of Iside cited above, which reads: καἰ καθάπερ οἱ μαθηματικοὶ τὴν ἶριν λέγουσι On the difference between the theories of Aristotle and Posidonius cf. O. Gilbert, Die meteorologischen Theorien des griechischen Altertums, pp. 614-616.
4. Powell ( Collectanea Alexandrina, p. 9) prints these lines as fragment 2 of the Phaenomena of Hegesianax; see note a on p. 39 supra.