Notes on the current edition
Concerning the Face which Appears in the Orb Of the Moon
1.
In
Adv. Coloten, 1115 B Strato’s denial of this is cited as an example of his opposition to Plato; and in
An. Proc. in Timaeo, 1014 C - D Plutarch, speaking of the creation of the world by the Platonic demiurge, says
τὸ κάλλιστον ἀπεργασάμενος καὶ τελειότατον
ζῳον, thereby referring to such passages as
Timaeus, 30 B - D, 32 C - D, 68 E, 69 B - C. Still, Platonic though it is, this assumption is one which his Stoic adversaries would grant (
cf. Diogenes Laertius, vii. 139 and 142-143 [=
S. V. F. ii, frags. 634 and 633]); and Plutarch believes that in granting it they are committed to the implication that the moon despite its location can consist of earth.
2.
cf.
Aristotle,
Caelo, 277 B 1-2
:
ουδὲ βίᾳ (scil.
φέρεται αὐτῦν τὸ μὲν ἄνω τὸ δὲ κάτω)
ὥσοερ τινές φασι τῇ ἐκθλίξει, and Cherniss,
Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy, p. 191, n. 196.
3.
For this Atomist, who is not to be confused with the Epicurean, Metrodorus of Lampsacus, or with the Anaxagorean,
cf. Diels-Kranz,
Frag, der Vorsok⁵ ii, pp. 231-234; the present passage should be added to that collection, from which it is missing. According to
Placitis, 889 B ( = Aëtius, ii. 15. 6 [
Dox. Graeci, p. 345 A 7-12]) Metrodorus considered the sun to be farthest from the earth, the moon below it, and lower than the moon the planets and fixed stars. For the explanation of the suns position here ascribed to Metrodorus see note a
supra and
cf. Simplicius, De Caelo, p. 712. 27-29.
4.
In
Fortuna, 98 B the phrase is quoted as Plato’s; it comes from
Timaeus, 45 B (
τῶν δὲ ὀργάνων πρῶτον μὲν φωσφόρα συνευεκτήναντο ὄμματα, τοιᾷδε ἐνδήσαντες αἰτίᾳ), and Plutarch’s
τῷ προσὠποῳ τοῦ παντὸς ἐνδεδεμένοι was suggested by this in conjunction with the preceding lines (45 a: .
. . ὑποθέντες αὐτ aυτόσε τὸ πρόσωπον, ὄργανα ἐνέδησαν τούτῳ), though Plato is there speaking of the human face and eyes.
5.
i.e. the spleen. For the purpose of liver and spleen
cf.
Aristotle,
Part. Animal. 670 A 20-29
, 670 B 4-17, 673 B 25-28; and for the close connection of liver and spleen 669 B 15 670 A 2.
6.
Eustathius,
Ad Iliadem, 695. 12 ff. says that according to the Stoics the
golden rope of
Iliad, viii. 19
is
ὁ ἥλιος εἰς ὃν κάτωθεν ὥσττερ εἰς καρδίαν ἀποχεῖται ἀναδιομένη ἡ τῶν ὑγρῶν ἀναθυμίασις. Starting from this K. Reinhardt (
Kosmos und Sympathie, pp. 332 ff.) argued that Posidonius was Plutarch’s source for the analogy between the parts of the cosmos and the organs of the body; but Reinhardt’s contention is refuted by R. M. Jones,
Class. Phil. xxvii (1932), pp. 121-128. Passages which equate sun and heart are fairly frequent, e.g. Theon of Smyrna, pp. 187. 13-188. 7 (Hiller); Proclus,
In Timaeum, 171 C - D (ii, p. 104. 20-21 and 28-29, Diehl); Macrobius,
Somn. Scip. i. 20. 6-7 (pp. 564-565, Eyssenhardt); Chalcidius,
In Platonis Timaeum, § 100 (p. 170, Wrobel);
Anon. Christ.,
Hermippus, pp. 17.15-18.11 (Kroll-Viereck) with astrological ascriptions of different bodily organs to the seven planets. An entirely different analogy between the various human faculties and the seven planets is mentioned by Proclus,
In Timaeum, 348 A - B (iii, p. 355. 7-18, Diehl), and Numenius in Macrobius,
Somn. Scip. i. 12. 14-15 (p. 533, Eyssenhardt); and I know no parallel to Plutarch’s further analogy of earth and moon with bowels and liver or spleen. In the pseudo-Hippocratic
Περὶ ἐβδομάδων the moon because of its central position in the cosmos appears to have been equated with the diaphragm (
cf. Roscher,
Die hippokratische Schrift von der Siebenzahl, p. 5. 45 ff., pp. 10-11, p. 123). In the section of Porphyry’s
Introduction to Ptolemys Apotelesmatica published by F. Cumont in
Mèlanges Bidez, i, pp. 155-156, the source of which Cumont contends must have been Antiochus of Athens, the moon is said to have the spleen as its special province, while the heart is assigned to the sun; but there the liver is the province of Jupiter.
7.
cf. Plato, Timaeus, 48 A:
noῦ δὲ ἀνάγκης ἄρχοντος τῷ πείθειν αὐτὴν τῶν γιγομένων τὰ πλεῖστα ἐπι τὸ βέλτιστον ἄγρειν κτλ. For the term
τὸ κατηναγκασμένον
cf.
S. V. F. ii, frag. 916.
8.
=
S. V. F. ii, frag. 668;
cf. Cleomedes, ii. 3. 99 (pp. 178. 26-180. 8, Ziegler) and contrast ii. 4. 100 (p. 182. 8-10). On the Stoic
ether
cf. Diogenes Laertius, vii. 137 (=
S. V. F. ii, frag. 580) and note g on 922 B
supra.
9.
The lexica give
weigh
balance as the meaning of
σεσήλωται, but the logic of the passage here shows that the word must be connected with
σηκός, not with
σήκωμα (
cf. Hesychius:
ἀποσηκώσας and
σάκωσε). Amyot’s
situez et colloquez and Keplers
quasi obvallata sunt render the sense correctly.