Notes on the current edition
Lives of Eminent Philosophers
1.
Ὁ παρ’ ἡμῶν. Reiske took this to mean
my fellowcitizen,
ὁ τῆς ἡμετέρας πόλεως. Hence Usener inferred that Nicias of Nicaea was the author here used by D. L.; but nothing that we know of this Nicias tends to confirm such a conjecture. In favour of the translation adopted by most scholars it may be urged that Strabo calls the Stoics
οἱ ἡμέτεροι, just as Cicero calls the Academics
nostri. Even if we accept this meaning,
a Sceptic like myself, a further subtlety arises. Is D. L. here speaking in his own person or has he merely transcribed
ὁ παρ’ ἡμῶν from a monograph of a Sceptic? Something may be urged on either side; for reasons given in Introd. p. xiii, the former conjecture seems somewhat more probable.
2.
Possibly the proem of the
Silli.
3.
Fr. 1 D.
4.
Diels regards the passage from
καὶ ἔπη,§ 110, down to
Τίμων ὁ μισάνθρωπος,§ 112, as an insertion, disturbing the symmetry of the materials derived from Antigonus of Carystus.
5.
i.e. he collaborated with these two tragic poets, Alexander the Aetolian and Homer of Byzantinum, partly by furnishing them with plots, partly by handing over scenes from unpublished plays of his own, or other similar material.
6.
Similar carelessness is recorded of Lamartine.
7.
Usually explained, after Diogenianus, of two notorious thieves, Attagas the Thessalian and Numenius the Corinthian. There may, however, be a sly hit at Pyrrho’s disciple Numenius (
supra, § 102). Or merely the birds partridge and woodcock may be meant, not any Mr. Partridge and Mr. Woodcock.
8.
This is probably the same person as is referred to by Clem. Alex.
Strom. iv. 56, where the text reads
Παῦλος ὁ Λακύδου γνώριμος. His heroic end was also extolled (Clement says) by Timotheus of Pergamum. See Wilamowitz,
Phil. Unters. iv. p. 107.
9.
Possibly
κυδαθηναιεύς,
i.e. a member of the well-known Attic deme, into which even Italians with such names as Saturninus might penetrate under the cosmopolitan empire of the Severi.